[中、低场磁共振成像在腕部损伤中的应用]。

Brigitte Happel, M Breitenseher, S Trattnig, Ch Gäbler, Ch Kukla, Th Rand, H Imhof, G Lechner
{"title":"[中、低场磁共振成像在腕部损伤中的应用]。","authors":"Brigitte Happel,&nbsp;M Breitenseher,&nbsp;S Trattnig,&nbsp;Ch Gäbler,&nbsp;Ch Kukla,&nbsp;Th Rand,&nbsp;H Imhof,&nbsp;G Lechner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of magnet resonance imaging in comparison of a dedicated 0.2-T unit and a 1.0-T unit in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and other wrist fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In 20 patients (14 m/6 f) with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and a normal six view radiographic exam, magnet resonance imaging was performed first with the dedicated 1.0-T unit and afterwards with the 0.2-T unit within 7 days after trauma. T1 weighted spin-echo, STIR and T2-weighted 3D GRE sequences were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 0.2 Tesla dedicated system is inferior to the 1.0 Tesla unit concerning the outcome of the 3 examiners. Especially the areas of bone bruise showed different results: each examiner detected at least two more cases of bone bruise with the 1.0 Telsa unit, which could not be defined with the 0.2 Tesla unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows, how utmost sensitive magnet resonance imaging is referring to unremoved fractures of the scaphoid and to other wrist abnormalities. Results with the 0.2 Tesla dedicated system was inferior compared to the 1.0 Tesla unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":76823,"journal":{"name":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement","volume":" 113","pages":"41-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Middle field and low field magnetic resonance tomography in wrist injuries].\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte Happel,&nbsp;M Breitenseher,&nbsp;S Trattnig,&nbsp;Ch Gäbler,&nbsp;Ch Kukla,&nbsp;Th Rand,&nbsp;H Imhof,&nbsp;G Lechner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value of magnet resonance imaging in comparison of a dedicated 0.2-T unit and a 1.0-T unit in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and other wrist fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In 20 patients (14 m/6 f) with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and a normal six view radiographic exam, magnet resonance imaging was performed first with the dedicated 1.0-T unit and afterwards with the 0.2-T unit within 7 days after trauma. T1 weighted spin-echo, STIR and T2-weighted 3D GRE sequences were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 0.2 Tesla dedicated system is inferior to the 1.0 Tesla unit concerning the outcome of the 3 examiners. Especially the areas of bone bruise showed different results: each examiner detected at least two more cases of bone bruise with the 1.0 Telsa unit, which could not be defined with the 0.2 Tesla unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows, how utmost sensitive magnet resonance imaging is referring to unremoved fractures of the scaphoid and to other wrist abnormalities. Results with the 0.2 Tesla dedicated system was inferior compared to the 1.0 Tesla unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 113\",\"pages\":\"41-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价磁共振成像在临床疑似舟状骨骨折及其他腕部骨折患者中应用0.2 t专用装置与1.0 t专用装置的诊断价值。材料与方法:20例临床疑似舟状骨骨折患者(14 m/6 f),经正常六层位影像学检查,创伤后7天内先用专用1.0-T单元进行磁共振成像,后用0.2-T单元进行磁共振成像。T1加权自旋回波、STIR和t2加权三维GRE序列。结果:3名审查员的结果,0.2特斯拉专用系统低于1.0特斯拉。特别是骨挫伤的区域显示出不同的结果:每个审查员用1.0特斯拉单位检测到至少两例以上的骨挫伤,而用0.2特斯拉单位无法定义。结论:本研究表明,磁共振成像在未切除舟状骨骨折和其他腕部异常中是多么敏感。结果表明,0.2特斯拉专用系统与1.0特斯拉专用系统相比效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Middle field and low field magnetic resonance tomography in wrist injuries].

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of magnet resonance imaging in comparison of a dedicated 0.2-T unit and a 1.0-T unit in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and other wrist fractures.

Material and methods: In 20 patients (14 m/6 f) with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and a normal six view radiographic exam, magnet resonance imaging was performed first with the dedicated 1.0-T unit and afterwards with the 0.2-T unit within 7 days after trauma. T1 weighted spin-echo, STIR and T2-weighted 3D GRE sequences were performed.

Results: The 0.2 Tesla dedicated system is inferior to the 1.0 Tesla unit concerning the outcome of the 3 examiners. Especially the areas of bone bruise showed different results: each examiner detected at least two more cases of bone bruise with the 1.0 Telsa unit, which could not be defined with the 0.2 Tesla unit.

Conclusions: This study shows, how utmost sensitive magnet resonance imaging is referring to unremoved fractures of the scaphoid and to other wrist abnormalities. Results with the 0.2 Tesla dedicated system was inferior compared to the 1.0 Tesla unit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信