可包装复合材料光密度的测量:直接和间接数字系统的比较。

Q2 Dentistry
Luiz Felipe Rodrigues Graziottin, Nilza Pereira da Costa, Ivori Dutra da Silveira, Elaine Bauer Veeck
{"title":"可包装复合材料光密度的测量:直接和间接数字系统的比较。","authors":"Luiz Felipe Rodrigues Graziottin,&nbsp;Nilza Pereira da Costa,&nbsp;Ivori Dutra da Silveira,&nbsp;Elaine Bauer Veeck","doi":"10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to measure the optical density of four packable composite resins with widths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm, by means of Digora (direct) and DentScan DentView (indirect) digital imaging systems, in order to compare both methods. Twenty acrylic plates, with the proposed thicknesses, were used, each one containing a sample of each resin. Each acrylic plate was radiographed three times, under a standardized technique. For the Digora system, an optical plate was used under each resin sample, and, for the DentScan DentView system, occlusal films were employed, totalizing 60 exposures for each system. Optical plates and films were scanned and three consecutive optical readouts were carried out, totalizing 1,440 readouts. The results were submitted to statistical analysis and revealed that the average optical density of the four resins always increased as thickness increased. Regarding the comparisons between the composite resins, in both analysis the resin with the greater optical density was Surefil followed by Prodigy Condensable, Alert and Solitaire . The correlations between the results of Digora and DentScan DentView were significant for the different thicknesses and materials. The observed tendency is that as the values obtained with the Digora system increase, so do the values obtained with DentScan DentView . While thickness increased, the values of optical density in both Digora and DentScan DentView tended to approach each other. The Digora system presented smaller amplitude between the results obtained in adjacent thicknesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":35295,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","volume":"16 4","pages":"299-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of the optical density of packable composites: comparison between direct and indirect digital systems.\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Felipe Rodrigues Graziottin,&nbsp;Nilza Pereira da Costa,&nbsp;Ivori Dutra da Silveira,&nbsp;Elaine Bauer Veeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to measure the optical density of four packable composite resins with widths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm, by means of Digora (direct) and DentScan DentView (indirect) digital imaging systems, in order to compare both methods. Twenty acrylic plates, with the proposed thicknesses, were used, each one containing a sample of each resin. Each acrylic plate was radiographed three times, under a standardized technique. For the Digora system, an optical plate was used under each resin sample, and, for the DentScan DentView system, occlusal films were employed, totalizing 60 exposures for each system. Optical plates and films were scanned and three consecutive optical readouts were carried out, totalizing 1,440 readouts. The results were submitted to statistical analysis and revealed that the average optical density of the four resins always increased as thickness increased. Regarding the comparisons between the composite resins, in both analysis the resin with the greater optical density was Surefil followed by Prodigy Condensable, Alert and Solitaire . The correlations between the results of Digora and DentScan DentView were significant for the different thicknesses and materials. The observed tendency is that as the values obtained with the Digora system increase, so do the values obtained with DentScan DentView . While thickness increased, the values of optical density in both Digora and DentScan DentView tended to approach each other. The Digora system presented smaller amplitude between the results obtained in adjacent thicknesses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"299-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2003/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912002000400004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2003/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究的目的是通过Digora(直接)和DentScan DentView(间接)数字成像系统测量宽度为1,2,3和4mm的四种可包装复合树脂的光学密度,以比较两种方法。使用了20块具有建议厚度的丙烯酸板,每个板都含有每种树脂的样品。每个亚克力板在标准化技术下进行了三次放射照相。对于Digora系统,在每个树脂样品下使用光学板,对于DentScan DentView系统,使用咬合膜,每个系统总共曝光60次。扫描光学底片,连续三次进行光学读出,共计1440次读出。统计分析结果表明,四种树脂的平均光密度随厚度的增加而增加。在两种树脂的对比中,光密度最大的树脂是Surefil,其次是Prodigy consable, Alert和Solitaire。对于不同的厚度和材料,Digora和DentScan DentView结果之间的相关性是显著的。观察到的趋势是,随着Digora系统获得的值增加,DentScan DentView获得的值也增加。随着厚度的增加,Digora和DentScan的光密度值趋于接近。Digora系统在相邻厚度下的振幅较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of the optical density of packable composites: comparison between direct and indirect digital systems.

The aim of this study was to measure the optical density of four packable composite resins with widths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm, by means of Digora (direct) and DentScan DentView (indirect) digital imaging systems, in order to compare both methods. Twenty acrylic plates, with the proposed thicknesses, were used, each one containing a sample of each resin. Each acrylic plate was radiographed three times, under a standardized technique. For the Digora system, an optical plate was used under each resin sample, and, for the DentScan DentView system, occlusal films were employed, totalizing 60 exposures for each system. Optical plates and films were scanned and three consecutive optical readouts were carried out, totalizing 1,440 readouts. The results were submitted to statistical analysis and revealed that the average optical density of the four resins always increased as thickness increased. Regarding the comparisons between the composite resins, in both analysis the resin with the greater optical density was Surefil followed by Prodigy Condensable, Alert and Solitaire . The correlations between the results of Digora and DentScan DentView were significant for the different thicknesses and materials. The observed tendency is that as the values obtained with the Digora system increase, so do the values obtained with DentScan DentView . While thickness increased, the values of optical density in both Digora and DentScan DentView tended to approach each other. The Digora system presented smaller amplitude between the results obtained in adjacent thicknesses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira is a new quarterly published journal (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), with an annual supplement (Anais da Reunião de Pesquisa Odontológica da SBPqO), by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica [Brazilian Society of Odontological Research] and University of São Paulo. It replaces Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (ISSN 0103-0663).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信