非专科外科单位跟腱断裂开放性手术修复的临床和功能结果。

A Coutts, A MacGregor, J Gibson, N Maffulli
{"title":"非专科外科单位跟腱断裂开放性手术修复的临床和功能结果。","authors":"A Coutts,&nbsp;A MacGregor,&nbsp;J Gibson,&nbsp;N Maffulli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We followed up 25 patients (average age 47.9 years, range 22 to 77) after open repair of their Achilles tendon rupture. All had been operated on by a single general surgeon using an end-to-end reabsorbable suture, and immobilised in a plaster of Paris cast for six weeks. All patients had been discharged from follow up by 18 weeks from the operation. At an average of 3.4 years (range six months to 9.25 years), 18 had \"excellent\", six (24%) \"good\" and one (4%) \"satisfactory\" results. All but one patient were able to walk on tiptoes, and 20 of the 22 patients examined directly walked without a limp. Ultrasonography showed the injured tendons to be on average 2.3 times thicker in the antero-posterior diameter and 1.7 times thicker in the transverse diameter. In the hands of a single non-specialist but fully trained general surgeon, this management regimen produced full return to pre-operative activities in the majority of patients, and a low rate of local complications. The macroscopic and ultrasonographic appearance of the operated tendon remained abnormal, but this was not associated with any overt clinical disturbance</p>","PeriodicalId":76058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh","volume":"47 6","pages":"753-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and functional results of open operative repair for Achilles tendon rupture in a non-specialist surgical unit.\",\"authors\":\"A Coutts,&nbsp;A MacGregor,&nbsp;J Gibson,&nbsp;N Maffulli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We followed up 25 patients (average age 47.9 years, range 22 to 77) after open repair of their Achilles tendon rupture. All had been operated on by a single general surgeon using an end-to-end reabsorbable suture, and immobilised in a plaster of Paris cast for six weeks. All patients had been discharged from follow up by 18 weeks from the operation. At an average of 3.4 years (range six months to 9.25 years), 18 had \\\"excellent\\\", six (24%) \\\"good\\\" and one (4%) \\\"satisfactory\\\" results. All but one patient were able to walk on tiptoes, and 20 of the 22 patients examined directly walked without a limp. Ultrasonography showed the injured tendons to be on average 2.3 times thicker in the antero-posterior diameter and 1.7 times thicker in the transverse diameter. In the hands of a single non-specialist but fully trained general surgeon, this management regimen produced full return to pre-operative activities in the majority of patients, and a low rate of local complications. The macroscopic and ultrasonographic appearance of the operated tendon remained abnormal, but this was not associated with any overt clinical disturbance</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"753-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们随访了25例跟腱断裂开放修复后的患者(平均年龄47.9岁,22 ~ 77岁)。所有患者均由一名普通外科医生进行手术,使用端到端可吸收缝合线,并用巴黎石膏固定6周。所有患者均于术后18周出院。在平均3.4年(6个月至9.25年)中,18人被评为“优秀”,6人(24%)“好”和一(4%)“令人满意”的结果。除了一名患者外,所有患者都能踮脚走路,22名接受检查的患者中有20名直接走路没有跛行。超声检查显示损伤肌腱前后径平均增厚2.3倍,横径平均增厚1.7倍。在一名非专科但训练有素的普通外科医生的指导下,这种治疗方案使大多数患者完全恢复了术前活动,局部并发症发生率很低。手术肌腱的宏观和超声表现仍然异常,但这与任何明显的临床障碍无关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and functional results of open operative repair for Achilles tendon rupture in a non-specialist surgical unit.

We followed up 25 patients (average age 47.9 years, range 22 to 77) after open repair of their Achilles tendon rupture. All had been operated on by a single general surgeon using an end-to-end reabsorbable suture, and immobilised in a plaster of Paris cast for six weeks. All patients had been discharged from follow up by 18 weeks from the operation. At an average of 3.4 years (range six months to 9.25 years), 18 had "excellent", six (24%) "good" and one (4%) "satisfactory" results. All but one patient were able to walk on tiptoes, and 20 of the 22 patients examined directly walked without a limp. Ultrasonography showed the injured tendons to be on average 2.3 times thicker in the antero-posterior diameter and 1.7 times thicker in the transverse diameter. In the hands of a single non-specialist but fully trained general surgeon, this management regimen produced full return to pre-operative activities in the majority of patients, and a low rate of local complications. The macroscopic and ultrasonographic appearance of the operated tendon remained abnormal, but this was not associated with any overt clinical disturbance

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信