医源性脾损伤。

K Cassar, A Munro
{"title":"医源性脾损伤。","authors":"K Cassar,&nbsp;A Munro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iatrogenic injury to the spleen is a recognised complication of abdominal surgery but the extent of the problem is often under-estimated. This may be due to failure to report splenic injury on the operation note or inaccurate recording of the indication for splenectomy. In this review article we have tried to estimate the incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury during abdominal surgery, the morbidity and mortality associated with splenic injury and the risk factors for injury to the spleen. We have also identified the common types and mechanisms of injury to the spleen and have made suggestions as to how splenic injury can be avoided and, when it occurs, how it should be managed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline literature search was performed to identify articles relating to \"incidental splenectomy\", \"iatrogenic splenic injury\", \"iatrogenic splenectomy\" and \"splenectomy as a complication of common abdominal procedures\". The relevant articles from the reference lists were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to 40% of all splenectomies are performed for iatrogenic injury. The risk of splenic injury is highest during left hemicolectomy (1-8%), open anti-reflux procedures (3-20%), left nephrectomy (4-13%) and during exposure and reconstruction of the proximal abdominal aorta and its branches (21-60%). Splenic injury results in prolonged operating time, increased blood loss and longer hospital stay. It is also associated with a two to ten-fold increase in infection rate and up to a doubling of morbidity rates. Mortality is also reported to be higher in patients undergoing splenectomy for iatrogenic injury. The risk of injury to the spleen is higher in patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery, in the elderly and in obese patients. A transperitoneal approach significantly increases the risk of splenic injury during left nephrectomy compared with an extraperitoneal approach and the risk is even higher if the indication for surgery is malignancy. Excessive traction, injudicious use of retractors and direct trauma are the commonest mechanisms of injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury is underestimated because of poor documentation. Splenic injury during abdominal surgery can be reduced by achieving good exposure and adequate visualisation, avoiding undue traction and by early careful division of splenic ligaments and adhesions. When the spleen is injured splenic preservation is desirable and often feasible, but this should not be at the expense of excessive blood loss</p>","PeriodicalId":76058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh","volume":"47 6","pages":"731-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iatrogenic splenic injury.\",\"authors\":\"K Cassar,&nbsp;A Munro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iatrogenic injury to the spleen is a recognised complication of abdominal surgery but the extent of the problem is often under-estimated. This may be due to failure to report splenic injury on the operation note or inaccurate recording of the indication for splenectomy. In this review article we have tried to estimate the incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury during abdominal surgery, the morbidity and mortality associated with splenic injury and the risk factors for injury to the spleen. We have also identified the common types and mechanisms of injury to the spleen and have made suggestions as to how splenic injury can be avoided and, when it occurs, how it should be managed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline literature search was performed to identify articles relating to \\\"incidental splenectomy\\\", \\\"iatrogenic splenic injury\\\", \\\"iatrogenic splenectomy\\\" and \\\"splenectomy as a complication of common abdominal procedures\\\". The relevant articles from the reference lists were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to 40% of all splenectomies are performed for iatrogenic injury. The risk of splenic injury is highest during left hemicolectomy (1-8%), open anti-reflux procedures (3-20%), left nephrectomy (4-13%) and during exposure and reconstruction of the proximal abdominal aorta and its branches (21-60%). Splenic injury results in prolonged operating time, increased blood loss and longer hospital stay. It is also associated with a two to ten-fold increase in infection rate and up to a doubling of morbidity rates. Mortality is also reported to be higher in patients undergoing splenectomy for iatrogenic injury. The risk of injury to the spleen is higher in patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery, in the elderly and in obese patients. A transperitoneal approach significantly increases the risk of splenic injury during left nephrectomy compared with an extraperitoneal approach and the risk is even higher if the indication for surgery is malignancy. Excessive traction, injudicious use of retractors and direct trauma are the commonest mechanisms of injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury is underestimated because of poor documentation. Splenic injury during abdominal surgery can be reduced by achieving good exposure and adequate visualisation, avoiding undue traction and by early careful division of splenic ligaments and adhesions. When the spleen is injured splenic preservation is desirable and often feasible, but this should not be at the expense of excessive blood loss</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"731-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医源性脾脏损伤是公认的腹部手术并发症,但问题的程度往往被低估。这可能是由于没有在手术记录上报告脾脏损伤或不准确记录脾切除术的指征。在这篇综述文章中,我们试图估计腹部手术中医源性脾损伤的发生率,与脾损伤相关的发病率和死亡率以及脾损伤的危险因素。我们还确定了脾脏损伤的常见类型和机制,并就如何避免脾脏损伤以及当脾脏损伤发生时应如何处理提出了建议。方法:检索Medline文献,找出“偶发性脾切除术”、“医源性脾损伤”、“医源性脾切除术”和“脾切除术作为常见腹部手术并发症”的相关文章。还从参考文献表中获得了相关文章。结果:高达40%的脾切除术是因医源性损伤进行的。脾损伤的风险在左结肠切除术(1-8%)、开放式抗反流手术(3-20%)、左肾切除术(4-13%)和暴露和重建腹近端主动脉及其分支(21-60%)期间最高。脾损伤导致手术时间延长,出血量增加,住院时间延长。它还与感染率增加2至10倍和发病率增加一倍有关。据报道,因医源性损伤而行脾切除术的患者死亡率也较高。曾经做过腹部手术的患者、老年人和肥胖患者脾脏损伤的风险更高。与腹膜外入路相比,经腹腔入路明显增加左肾切除术中脾损伤的风险,如果手术指征是恶性肿瘤,风险甚至更高。过度牵引,不明智地使用牵开器和直接创伤是最常见的损伤机制。结论:由于文献资料不足,医源性脾损伤的发生率被低估。腹部手术中脾脏损伤可通过良好的暴露和充分的显像,避免过度牵引和早期仔细分离脾韧带和粘连来减少。当脾脏受损时,保存脾脏是可取的,而且通常是可行的,但这不应以失血过多为代价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iatrogenic splenic injury.

Background: Iatrogenic injury to the spleen is a recognised complication of abdominal surgery but the extent of the problem is often under-estimated. This may be due to failure to report splenic injury on the operation note or inaccurate recording of the indication for splenectomy. In this review article we have tried to estimate the incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury during abdominal surgery, the morbidity and mortality associated with splenic injury and the risk factors for injury to the spleen. We have also identified the common types and mechanisms of injury to the spleen and have made suggestions as to how splenic injury can be avoided and, when it occurs, how it should be managed.

Methods: A Medline literature search was performed to identify articles relating to "incidental splenectomy", "iatrogenic splenic injury", "iatrogenic splenectomy" and "splenectomy as a complication of common abdominal procedures". The relevant articles from the reference lists were also obtained.

Results: Up to 40% of all splenectomies are performed for iatrogenic injury. The risk of splenic injury is highest during left hemicolectomy (1-8%), open anti-reflux procedures (3-20%), left nephrectomy (4-13%) and during exposure and reconstruction of the proximal abdominal aorta and its branches (21-60%). Splenic injury results in prolonged operating time, increased blood loss and longer hospital stay. It is also associated with a two to ten-fold increase in infection rate and up to a doubling of morbidity rates. Mortality is also reported to be higher in patients undergoing splenectomy for iatrogenic injury. The risk of injury to the spleen is higher in patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery, in the elderly and in obese patients. A transperitoneal approach significantly increases the risk of splenic injury during left nephrectomy compared with an extraperitoneal approach and the risk is even higher if the indication for surgery is malignancy. Excessive traction, injudicious use of retractors and direct trauma are the commonest mechanisms of injury.

Conclusions: The incidence of iatrogenic splenic injury is underestimated because of poor documentation. Splenic injury during abdominal surgery can be reduced by achieving good exposure and adequate visualisation, avoiding undue traction and by early careful division of splenic ligaments and adhesions. When the spleen is injured splenic preservation is desirable and often feasible, but this should not be at the expense of excessive blood loss

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信