“天然草药”有多天然?沙特的观点。

Maciej J Bogusz, Mohammed al Tufail, Huda Hassan
{"title":"“天然草药”有多天然?沙特的观点。","authors":"Maciej J Bogusz,&nbsp;Mohammed al Tufail,&nbsp;Huda Hassan","doi":"10.1007/BF03256198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a rapidly growing trend in the consumption of herbal remedies in industrialised and developing countries. Users of herbal remedies are at risk of toxicity and adverse interactions of herbal preparations due to their frequent contamination with metals and adulteration with synthetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of herbal remedies present on the market in Saudi Arabia in recent years.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>247 herbal remedies and related preparations were examined from 2000-2001 at the Toxicology Laboratory, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Herbal powder samples were the most common sample type examined (n = 80), followed by complete, packed preparations (n = 59), single undescribed capsules or pills (n = 46), loose plant leaves or seeds (n = 28), creams (n = 18) and liquid or jelly samples (n = 16). All samples were subjected to toxicological screening for organic substances using gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis, screening for heavy metals (arsenic, mercury, and lead) using inductive coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and microbiological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preparations analysed were used to treat the following indications: leukaemia and other forms of cancer (n = 22); obesity (n = 18); diabetes mellitus (n = 14); rheumatic disorders (n = 14); skin pigmentation problems (n = 11); or to enhance male sexual activity (n = 9). In 123 cases, the indication of use was not known. 39 samples contained high concentrations of heavy metals. This was particularly striking in remedies used to treat leukaemia (arsenic content of 522-161,600 ppm) and in creams for whitening skin (mercury content of 5,700-126,000 ppm). Eight preparations contained synthetic drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in sedative preparations, cyproheptadine in a remedy to gain bodyweight, ibuprofen and dipyrone in herbal capsules used to treat rheumatism). 18 samples were contaminated with micro-organisms. 14 samples contained toxic substances of natural origin. Of the 247 examined preparations, 77 (i.e. over 30%) were disqualified due to high heavy metals content, bacterial contamination or presence of toxic organic substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows an urgent need to control the production, importing and selling of herbal preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7401,"journal":{"name":"Adverse drug reactions and toxicological reviews","volume":"21 4","pages":"219-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256198","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How natural are 'natural herbal remedies'? A Saudi perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Maciej J Bogusz,&nbsp;Mohammed al Tufail,&nbsp;Huda Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03256198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a rapidly growing trend in the consumption of herbal remedies in industrialised and developing countries. Users of herbal remedies are at risk of toxicity and adverse interactions of herbal preparations due to their frequent contamination with metals and adulteration with synthetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of herbal remedies present on the market in Saudi Arabia in recent years.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>247 herbal remedies and related preparations were examined from 2000-2001 at the Toxicology Laboratory, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Herbal powder samples were the most common sample type examined (n = 80), followed by complete, packed preparations (n = 59), single undescribed capsules or pills (n = 46), loose plant leaves or seeds (n = 28), creams (n = 18) and liquid or jelly samples (n = 16). All samples were subjected to toxicological screening for organic substances using gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis, screening for heavy metals (arsenic, mercury, and lead) using inductive coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and microbiological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preparations analysed were used to treat the following indications: leukaemia and other forms of cancer (n = 22); obesity (n = 18); diabetes mellitus (n = 14); rheumatic disorders (n = 14); skin pigmentation problems (n = 11); or to enhance male sexual activity (n = 9). In 123 cases, the indication of use was not known. 39 samples contained high concentrations of heavy metals. This was particularly striking in remedies used to treat leukaemia (arsenic content of 522-161,600 ppm) and in creams for whitening skin (mercury content of 5,700-126,000 ppm). Eight preparations contained synthetic drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in sedative preparations, cyproheptadine in a remedy to gain bodyweight, ibuprofen and dipyrone in herbal capsules used to treat rheumatism). 18 samples were contaminated with micro-organisms. 14 samples contained toxic substances of natural origin. Of the 247 examined preparations, 77 (i.e. over 30%) were disqualified due to high heavy metals content, bacterial contamination or presence of toxic organic substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows an urgent need to control the production, importing and selling of herbal preparations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adverse drug reactions and toxicological reviews\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"219-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256198\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adverse drug reactions and toxicological reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adverse drug reactions and toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

目的:在工业化国家和发展中国家,草药的消费呈快速增长的趋势。由于草药制剂经常被金属污染和掺入合成药物,因此草药制剂的使用者面临毒性和不良相互作用的风险。本研究的目的是评估近年来沙特阿拉伯市场上草药的质量。方法:2000-2001年在沙特阿拉伯利雅得费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心毒理学实验室检查了247种草药和相关制剂。草药粉末样品是最常见的样品类型(n = 80),其次是完整的包装制剂(n = 59),单个未描述的胶囊或药丸(n = 46),松散的植物叶子或种子(n = 28),药膏(n = 18)和液体或果冻样品(n = 16)。所有样品均采用气相色谱-质谱分析进行有机物质毒理学筛选,采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法筛选重金属(砷、汞和铅),并进行微生物检查。结果:所分析的制剂用于治疗以下适应症:白血病和其他形式的癌症(n = 22);肥胖(n = 18);糖尿病(n = 14);风湿病(n = 14);皮肤色素沉着问题(n = 11);或增强男性性活动(n = 9)。在123例中,使用适应症尚不清楚。39个样本含有高浓度重金属。这在治疗白血病的药物(砷含量为522-161,600 ppm)和美白皮肤的面霜(汞含量为5,700-126,000 ppm)中尤为显著。8种制剂含有合成药物(例如,镇静剂制剂中含有苯二氮卓类药物和三环抗抑郁药,用于增加体重的药物中含有赛戊乙胺,用于治疗风湿病的草药胶囊中含有布洛芬和双吡酮)。18份样品被微生物污染。14个样本含有天然有毒物质。在247个被检查的制剂中,77个(即超过30%)由于重金属含量高、细菌污染或存在有毒有机物质而不合格。结论:对中药制剂的生产、进口和销售进行控制是当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How natural are 'natural herbal remedies'? A Saudi perspective.

Objective: There is a rapidly growing trend in the consumption of herbal remedies in industrialised and developing countries. Users of herbal remedies are at risk of toxicity and adverse interactions of herbal preparations due to their frequent contamination with metals and adulteration with synthetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of herbal remedies present on the market in Saudi Arabia in recent years.

Methodology: 247 herbal remedies and related preparations were examined from 2000-2001 at the Toxicology Laboratory, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Herbal powder samples were the most common sample type examined (n = 80), followed by complete, packed preparations (n = 59), single undescribed capsules or pills (n = 46), loose plant leaves or seeds (n = 28), creams (n = 18) and liquid or jelly samples (n = 16). All samples were subjected to toxicological screening for organic substances using gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis, screening for heavy metals (arsenic, mercury, and lead) using inductive coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and microbiological examination.

Results: The preparations analysed were used to treat the following indications: leukaemia and other forms of cancer (n = 22); obesity (n = 18); diabetes mellitus (n = 14); rheumatic disorders (n = 14); skin pigmentation problems (n = 11); or to enhance male sexual activity (n = 9). In 123 cases, the indication of use was not known. 39 samples contained high concentrations of heavy metals. This was particularly striking in remedies used to treat leukaemia (arsenic content of 522-161,600 ppm) and in creams for whitening skin (mercury content of 5,700-126,000 ppm). Eight preparations contained synthetic drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in sedative preparations, cyproheptadine in a remedy to gain bodyweight, ibuprofen and dipyrone in herbal capsules used to treat rheumatism). 18 samples were contaminated with micro-organisms. 14 samples contained toxic substances of natural origin. Of the 247 examined preparations, 77 (i.e. over 30%) were disqualified due to high heavy metals content, bacterial contamination or presence of toxic organic substances.

Conclusion: The study shows an urgent need to control the production, importing and selling of herbal preparations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信