急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗。

Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.) Pub Date : 2002-09-01
David Mountain, George A Jelinek, Debra L O'Brien, Sharyn L Ingarfield, Ian G Jacobs, Dania M Lynch
{"title":"急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗。","authors":"David Mountain,&nbsp;George A Jelinek,&nbsp;Debra L O'Brien,&nbsp;Sharyn L Ingarfield,&nbsp;Ian G Jacobs,&nbsp;Dania M Lynch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey for the 1999 calendar year.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":81159,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)","volume":"14 3","pages":"267-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in Australasia 1999.\",\"authors\":\"David Mountain,&nbsp;George A Jelinek,&nbsp;Debra L O'Brien,&nbsp;Sharyn L Ingarfield,&nbsp;Ian G Jacobs,&nbsp;Dania M Lynch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey for the 1999 calendar year.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"267-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:介绍1999年澳大利亚各医院急性心肌梗死的血运重建术。设计:1999日历年的调查。环境:澳大利亚和新西兰的澳大利亚急诊医学学院认可的急诊科医院。参与者:80家受访医院中的48家(60%),包括15家三级医院和33家非三级医院。主要观察指标:从到达急诊科到开始溶栓治疗的时间、治疗地点、使用的药物、死亡率和颅内出血率。结果:约30%的急性心肌梗死患者接受了血运重建治疗。62%接受溶栓治疗的患者在急诊科接受这种治疗,其余患者在冠状动脉护理病房接受治疗。急诊科从门到针的时间中位数为35.0分钟,冠状动脉监护室为48.3分钟。链激酶溶栓率为58.3%。急诊溶栓患者的住院死亡率为6.7%,冠状动脉护理病房为4.3%,颅内出血率为0.8%,冠状动脉护理病房为0.7%。结论:该样本的溶栓总时间和转归率在国际报道的数据范围内。急诊科的时间比冠状动脉监护室短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in Australasia 1999.

Objective: To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.

Design: Survey for the 1999 calendar year.

Setting: Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.

Participants: Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.

Main outcome measures: Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.

Results: Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.

Conclusions: Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信