David Mountain, George A Jelinek, Debra L O'Brien, Sharyn L Ingarfield, Ian G Jacobs, Dania M Lynch
{"title":"急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗。","authors":"David Mountain, George A Jelinek, Debra L O'Brien, Sharyn L Ingarfield, Ian G Jacobs, Dania M Lynch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey for the 1999 calendar year.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":81159,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)","volume":"14 3","pages":"267-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in Australasia 1999.\",\"authors\":\"David Mountain, George A Jelinek, Debra L O'Brien, Sharyn L Ingarfield, Ian G Jacobs, Dania M Lynch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey for the 1999 calendar year.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"267-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in Australasia 1999.
Objective: To describe revascularization practice for acute myocardial infarction in a sample of Australasian hospitals during 1999.
Design: Survey for the 1999 calendar year.
Setting: Hospitals with Australasian College for Emergency Medicine-accredited emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.
Participants: Forty-eight hospitals of 80 surveyed (60%), comprising 15 tertiary and 33 non-tertiary hospitals.
Main outcome measures: Time from arrival in emergency department to initiation of thrombolytic therapy, site of therapy, agent used, mortality and intracranial haemorrhage rates.
Results: Approximately 30% of patients with acute myocardial infarction had revascularization therapy. Sixty-two per cent of patients receiving thrombolytics were given this treatment in the emergency department, the remainder in the coronary care unit. Overall median door-to-needle times were 35.0 min emergency department versus 48.3 min coronary care unit. Streptokinase was used for 58.3% of thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality of thrombolysed patients was 6.7% in the emergency department versus 4.3% in the coronary care unit with intracranial haemorrhage rates of 0.8% emergency department and 0.7% coronary care unit.
Conclusions: Overall times to thrombolysis and outcome rates in this sample were within internationally reported figures. Emergency department times were shorter than in coronary care unit.