制度创新:协和医院

Paul N. Uhlig MD, MPA (Associate Professor of Surgery), Jeffrey Brown MEd, Anne K. Nason MS, ARNP (Cardiac Services Nurse Practitioner), Addie Camelio BSW (Social Worker), Elise Kendall RPh (Staff Pharmacist)
{"title":"制度创新:协和医院","authors":"Paul N. Uhlig MD, MPA (Associate Professor of Surgery),&nbsp;Jeffrey Brown MEd,&nbsp;Anne K. Nason MS, ARNP (Cardiac Services Nurse Practitioner),&nbsp;Addie Camelio BSW (Social Worker),&nbsp;Elise Kendall RPh (Staff Pharmacist)","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28072-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital (Concord, NH) restructured clinical teamwork for improved safety and effectiveness on the basis of theory and practice from human factors science, aviation safety, and high-reliability organization theory. A team-based, collaborative rounds process—the Concord Collaborative Care Model—that involved use of a structured communications protocol was conducted daily at each patient’s bedside.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The entire care team agreed to meet at the same time each day (8:45 <span>am</span> to 9:30 <span>am</span>) to share information and develop a plan of care for each patient, with patient and family members as active participants. The cardiac surgery team developed a structured communications protocol adapted from human factors science. To provide a forum for discussion of team goals and progress and to address system-level concerns, a biweekly system rounds process was established.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following implementation of collaborative rounds, mortality of Concord Hospital’s cardiac surgery patients declined significantly from expected rates. Satisfaction rates of open heart patients scores were consistently in the 97th–99th percentile nationally. A quality of work life survey indicated that in every category, providers expressed greater satisfaction with the collaborative care process than with the traditional rounds process. Practice patterns in the Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital have changed to a much more collaborative and participatory process, with improved outcomes, happier patients, and more satisfied practitioners. A culture of continuous program improvement has been implemented that continues to evolve and produce benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 12","pages":"Pages 666-672"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28072-4","citationCount":"85","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System Innovation: Concord Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Paul N. Uhlig MD, MPA (Associate Professor of Surgery),&nbsp;Jeffrey Brown MEd,&nbsp;Anne K. Nason MS, ARNP (Cardiac Services Nurse Practitioner),&nbsp;Addie Camelio BSW (Social Worker),&nbsp;Elise Kendall RPh (Staff Pharmacist)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28072-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital (Concord, NH) restructured clinical teamwork for improved safety and effectiveness on the basis of theory and practice from human factors science, aviation safety, and high-reliability organization theory. A team-based, collaborative rounds process—the Concord Collaborative Care Model—that involved use of a structured communications protocol was conducted daily at each patient’s bedside.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The entire care team agreed to meet at the same time each day (8:45 <span>am</span> to 9:30 <span>am</span>) to share information and develop a plan of care for each patient, with patient and family members as active participants. The cardiac surgery team developed a structured communications protocol adapted from human factors science. To provide a forum for discussion of team goals and progress and to address system-level concerns, a biweekly system rounds process was established.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following implementation of collaborative rounds, mortality of Concord Hospital’s cardiac surgery patients declined significantly from expected rates. Satisfaction rates of open heart patients scores were consistently in the 97th–99th percentile nationally. A quality of work life survey indicated that in every category, providers expressed greater satisfaction with the collaborative care process than with the traditional rounds process. Practice patterns in the Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital have changed to a much more collaborative and participatory process, with improved outcomes, happier patients, and more satisfied practitioners. A culture of continuous program improvement has been implemented that continues to evolve and produce benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"volume\":\"28 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 666-672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28072-4\",\"citationCount\":\"85\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

摘要

康科德医院(Concord, NH)心脏外科项目在人因科学、航空安全和高可靠性组织理论和实践的基础上,对临床团队合作进行了重组,以提高安全性和有效性。一个以团队为基础的协作查房过程——康科德协作护理模式——每天在每个病人的床边进行,其中包括使用结构化的通信协议。方法整个护理团队约定每天在同一时间(上午8:45 ~ 9:30)开会,在患者和家属的积极参与下,分享信息并制定护理计划。心脏外科团队开发了一种基于人为因素科学的结构化通信协议。为了提供一个讨论团队目标和进展的论坛,并处理系统级的问题,建立了一个两周一次的系统轮询过程。结果协查房实施后,康科德医院心脏手术患者的死亡率明显低于预期。在全国范围内,心内直视患者的满意度评分始终保持在97 - 99个百分位数之间。一项工作生活质量调查表明,在每个类别中,提供者对协作护理过程的满意度都高于对传统查房过程的满意度。康科德医院心脏外科项目的实践模式已经转变为一个更具协作性和参与性的过程,结果有所改善,患者更快乐,从业人员更满意。一种持续的程序改进的文化已经被实施,它继续发展并产生效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System Innovation: Concord Hospital

Background

The Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital (Concord, NH) restructured clinical teamwork for improved safety and effectiveness on the basis of theory and practice from human factors science, aviation safety, and high-reliability organization theory. A team-based, collaborative rounds process—the Concord Collaborative Care Model—that involved use of a structured communications protocol was conducted daily at each patient’s bedside.

Methods

The entire care team agreed to meet at the same time each day (8:45 am to 9:30 am) to share information and develop a plan of care for each patient, with patient and family members as active participants. The cardiac surgery team developed a structured communications protocol adapted from human factors science. To provide a forum for discussion of team goals and progress and to address system-level concerns, a biweekly system rounds process was established.

Results

Following implementation of collaborative rounds, mortality of Concord Hospital’s cardiac surgery patients declined significantly from expected rates. Satisfaction rates of open heart patients scores were consistently in the 97th–99th percentile nationally. A quality of work life survey indicated that in every category, providers expressed greater satisfaction with the collaborative care process than with the traditional rounds process. Practice patterns in the Cardiac Surgery Program at Concord Hospital have changed to a much more collaborative and participatory process, with improved outcomes, happier patients, and more satisfied practitioners. A culture of continuous program improvement has been implemented that continues to evolve and produce benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信