一种无创ICP监测方法的临床应用

Bernhard Schmidt , Jürgen Klingelhöfer
{"title":"一种无创ICP监测方法的临床应用","authors":"Bernhard Schmidt ,&nbsp;Jürgen Klingelhöfer","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00044-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background and purpose:</em><span> Until now the assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP) requires invasive methods. A previously introduced mathematical model allowed the non-invasive estimation of ICP (nICP) from arterial blood pressure (ABP) and blood flow velocity (FV). In various studies we have investigated the accuracy of this method and possible clinical applications. </span><em>Methods and results:</em> Selected hemodynamic parameters, calculated from the cerebral blood FV and the ABP curves, were used to express the relationship between ABP input and ICP output by linear transformation rules. In several clinical studies the accuracy and possible benefits of this method of non-invasive ICP (nICP) assessment were investigated. <em>Assessment of ICP plateau waves:</em><span> In 17 severely head injured patients we verified this model by comparison of nICP and measured ICP during generation of plateau waves, recorded in seven of these patients. In all simulations plateau elevations of ICP were well replicated. The correlation coefficient between increase of nICP and real ICP was </span><em>R</em>=0.98; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001. <em>Lumbar infusion tests:</em><span> Twenty one hydrocephalic patients were studied. Parallel increases in real ICP and nICP during lumbar infusion tests were evidently visible. Resistance of cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rcsf) was computed using nICP and compared with Rcsf computed from real ICP. The mean error between real and non-invasive Rcsf was 4.1±2.2 mmHg min/ml. </span><em>Cerebral autoregulation:</em> One hundred and forty five patients were studied after severe head injuries. The state of autoregulation was assessed by moving correlation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP=ABP−ICP) and FV (Mx index). nICP instead of ICP was used to continuously estimate the state of autoregulation and to dynamically adapt the nICP procedure to this state. A median error between ICP and nICP of 6.0 mmHg was observed. Directly and non-invasively assessed Mx indices correlated highly significantly (<em>R</em>=0.9; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). <em>Conclusions:</em> The results demonstrate that the nICP assessment model constitutes a reliable method to monitor ICP and may therefore provide various useful clinical applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00044-7","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical applications of a non-invasive ICP monitoring method\",\"authors\":\"Bernhard Schmidt ,&nbsp;Jürgen Klingelhöfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00044-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Background and purpose:</em><span> Until now the assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP) requires invasive methods. A previously introduced mathematical model allowed the non-invasive estimation of ICP (nICP) from arterial blood pressure (ABP) and blood flow velocity (FV). In various studies we have investigated the accuracy of this method and possible clinical applications. </span><em>Methods and results:</em> Selected hemodynamic parameters, calculated from the cerebral blood FV and the ABP curves, were used to express the relationship between ABP input and ICP output by linear transformation rules. In several clinical studies the accuracy and possible benefits of this method of non-invasive ICP (nICP) assessment were investigated. <em>Assessment of ICP plateau waves:</em><span> In 17 severely head injured patients we verified this model by comparison of nICP and measured ICP during generation of plateau waves, recorded in seven of these patients. In all simulations plateau elevations of ICP were well replicated. The correlation coefficient between increase of nICP and real ICP was </span><em>R</em>=0.98; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001. <em>Lumbar infusion tests:</em><span> Twenty one hydrocephalic patients were studied. Parallel increases in real ICP and nICP during lumbar infusion tests were evidently visible. Resistance of cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rcsf) was computed using nICP and compared with Rcsf computed from real ICP. The mean error between real and non-invasive Rcsf was 4.1±2.2 mmHg min/ml. </span><em>Cerebral autoregulation:</em> One hundred and forty five patients were studied after severe head injuries. The state of autoregulation was assessed by moving correlation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP=ABP−ICP) and FV (Mx index). nICP instead of ICP was used to continuously estimate the state of autoregulation and to dynamically adapt the nICP procedure to this state. A median error between ICP and nICP of 6.0 mmHg was observed. Directly and non-invasively assessed Mx indices correlated highly significantly (<em>R</em>=0.9; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). <em>Conclusions:</em> The results demonstrate that the nICP assessment model constitutes a reliable method to monitor ICP and may therefore provide various useful clinical applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 37-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00044-7\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

背景与目的:目前,颅内压(ICP)的评估需要采用侵入性方法。先前引入的数学模型允许通过动脉血压(ABP)和血流速度(FV)非侵入性估计ICP (nICP)。在各种研究中,我们已经调查了这种方法的准确性和可能的临床应用。方法与结果:选取脑血FV和ABP曲线计算的血流动力学参数,用线性变换规则表达ABP输入与ICP输出之间的关系。在一些临床研究中,研究了这种非侵入性ICP (nICP)评估方法的准确性和可能的益处。颅内压平台波的评估:在17例严重颅脑损伤患者中,我们通过nICP与平台波产生时测量的ICP进行比较,验证了该模型,其中7例患者记录了平台波。在所有模拟中,ICP的高原高度都得到了很好的复制。nICP升高与实际ICP的相关系数R=0.98;术;0.001。腰椎输液试验:对21例脑积水患者进行了研究。在腰椎输注试验中,实际ICP和nICP明显平行增加。采用nICP计算脑脊液流出阻力(Rcsf),并与实际ICP计算Rcsf进行比较。真实Rcsf与无创Rcsf的平均误差为4.1±2.2 mmHg min/ml。脑自动调节:对145例重型颅脑损伤患者进行了研究。通过脑灌注压(CPP=ABP−ICP)与FV (Mx指数)的移动相关性来评估自调节状态。采用nICP代替ICP来连续估计自调节状态,并动态调整nICP过程以适应该状态。观察到ICP和nICP之间的中位误差为6.0 mmHg。直接和非侵入性评估的Mx指数高度相关(R=0.9;术中,0.001)。结论:结果表明,nICP评估模型是监测ICP的可靠方法,因此可以提供各种有用的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical applications of a non-invasive ICP monitoring method

Background and purpose: Until now the assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP) requires invasive methods. A previously introduced mathematical model allowed the non-invasive estimation of ICP (nICP) from arterial blood pressure (ABP) and blood flow velocity (FV). In various studies we have investigated the accuracy of this method and possible clinical applications. Methods and results: Selected hemodynamic parameters, calculated from the cerebral blood FV and the ABP curves, were used to express the relationship between ABP input and ICP output by linear transformation rules. In several clinical studies the accuracy and possible benefits of this method of non-invasive ICP (nICP) assessment were investigated. Assessment of ICP plateau waves: In 17 severely head injured patients we verified this model by comparison of nICP and measured ICP during generation of plateau waves, recorded in seven of these patients. In all simulations plateau elevations of ICP were well replicated. The correlation coefficient between increase of nICP and real ICP was R=0.98; P<0.001. Lumbar infusion tests: Twenty one hydrocephalic patients were studied. Parallel increases in real ICP and nICP during lumbar infusion tests were evidently visible. Resistance of cerebrospinal fluid outflow (Rcsf) was computed using nICP and compared with Rcsf computed from real ICP. The mean error between real and non-invasive Rcsf was 4.1±2.2 mmHg min/ml. Cerebral autoregulation: One hundred and forty five patients were studied after severe head injuries. The state of autoregulation was assessed by moving correlation of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP=ABP−ICP) and FV (Mx index). nICP instead of ICP was used to continuously estimate the state of autoregulation and to dynamically adapt the nICP procedure to this state. A median error between ICP and nICP of 6.0 mmHg was observed. Directly and non-invasively assessed Mx indices correlated highly significantly (R=0.9; P<0.001). Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the nICP assessment model constitutes a reliable method to monitor ICP and may therefore provide various useful clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信