在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流手术中,与球后麻醉相比,联合前腱亚、局部和内窥镜麻醉的患者舒适度。

Ophthalmic surgery and lasers Pub Date : 2002-11-01
Sukesh Kansal, Marlene R Moster, Marcia C Gomes, Courtland M Schmidt, Richard P Wilson
{"title":"在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流手术中,与球后麻醉相比,联合前腱亚、局部和内窥镜麻醉的患者舒适度。","authors":"Sukesh Kansal,&nbsp;Marlene R Moster,&nbsp;Marcia C Gomes,&nbsp;Courtland M Schmidt,&nbsp;Richard P Wilson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patient comfort using combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral (\"Blitz\") anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in glaucoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, 139 consecutive patients who received retrobulbar anesthesia and 139 consecutive patients who received Blitz anesthesia during glaucoma surgery were evaluated in a prospective fashion. The retrobulbar group included 49 trabeculectomies, 36 aqueous shunts, and 54 phacotrabeculectomies. The Blitz group included 49 trabeculectomies, 30 aqueous shunts, and 60 phacotrabeculectomies. Patients were asked to assess their level of ocular pain operatively and postoperatively on a 10-point visual analog scale. The operative and postoperative pain scores and postoperative sedation of patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia were compared with those of patients receiving Blitz anesthesia during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found in the mean operative or postoperative pain scores between the two groups during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, or aqueous shunt surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blitz anesthesia offers a reasonable alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"33 6","pages":"456-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient comfort with combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Sukesh Kansal,&nbsp;Marlene R Moster,&nbsp;Marcia C Gomes,&nbsp;Courtland M Schmidt,&nbsp;Richard P Wilson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patient comfort using combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral (\\\"Blitz\\\") anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in glaucoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, 139 consecutive patients who received retrobulbar anesthesia and 139 consecutive patients who received Blitz anesthesia during glaucoma surgery were evaluated in a prospective fashion. The retrobulbar group included 49 trabeculectomies, 36 aqueous shunts, and 54 phacotrabeculectomies. The Blitz group included 49 trabeculectomies, 30 aqueous shunts, and 60 phacotrabeculectomies. Patients were asked to assess their level of ocular pain operatively and postoperatively on a 10-point visual analog scale. The operative and postoperative pain scores and postoperative sedation of patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia were compared with those of patients receiving Blitz anesthesia during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found in the mean operative or postoperative pain scores between the two groups during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, or aqueous shunt surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blitz anesthesia offers a reasonable alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"456-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估青光眼手术中使用前腱亚、局部和内窥镜联合麻醉(“Blitz”)与球后麻醉的患者舒适度。患者和方法:在本研究中,对139例连续接受球后麻醉和139例连续接受Blitz麻醉的青光眼手术患者进行前瞻性评估。球后组包括49例小梁切除术,36例水分流术,54例超声小梁切除术。闪电战组包括49例小梁切除术,30例水分流术和60例超声小梁切除术。患者被要求在10分视觉模拟量表上评估他们手术和术后的眼部疼痛水平。分别比较球后麻醉患者与Blitz麻醉患者在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流术中的手术和术后疼痛评分及术后镇静程度。结果:两组患者小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流术的平均手术和术后疼痛评分均无统计学差异。结论:在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流手术中,闪电麻醉是球后麻醉的合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient comfort with combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.

Purpose: To assess patient comfort using combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral ("Blitz") anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in glaucoma surgery.

Patients and methods: In this study, 139 consecutive patients who received retrobulbar anesthesia and 139 consecutive patients who received Blitz anesthesia during glaucoma surgery were evaluated in a prospective fashion. The retrobulbar group included 49 trabeculectomies, 36 aqueous shunts, and 54 phacotrabeculectomies. The Blitz group included 49 trabeculectomies, 30 aqueous shunts, and 60 phacotrabeculectomies. Patients were asked to assess their level of ocular pain operatively and postoperatively on a 10-point visual analog scale. The operative and postoperative pain scores and postoperative sedation of patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia were compared with those of patients receiving Blitz anesthesia during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery, separately.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the mean operative or postoperative pain scores between the two groups during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, or aqueous shunt surgery.

Conclusions: Blitz anesthesia offers a reasonable alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信