超声指导下肝活检在门诊的疗效

Stefano Spiezia , Antonio Salvio , Carolina Di Somma , Caterina Scelzi , Angelo Pio Assanti , Francesco Giannattasio , Maria Varriale , Mario Visconti
{"title":"超声指导下肝活检在门诊的疗效","authors":"Stefano Spiezia ,&nbsp;Antonio Salvio ,&nbsp;Carolina Di Somma ,&nbsp;Caterina Scelzi ,&nbsp;Angelo Pio Assanti ,&nbsp;Francesco Giannattasio ,&nbsp;Maria Varriale ,&nbsp;Mario Visconti","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). <em>Methods:</em> From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. <em>Results:</em> The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of liver biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance on an outpatient basis\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Spiezia ,&nbsp;Antonio Salvio ,&nbsp;Carolina Di Somma ,&nbsp;Caterina Scelzi ,&nbsp;Angelo Pio Assanti ,&nbsp;Francesco Giannattasio ,&nbsp;Maria Varriale ,&nbsp;Mario Visconti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). <em>Methods:</em> From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. <em>Results:</em> The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:评价门诊超声引导下肝活检(ELB)与住院超声引导下肝活检(IP)的安全性和依从性。方法:1996年6月至2000年11月,对418例弥漫性肝病患者进行ELB检查,其中住院246例(IP ELB),日间医院172例(DH ELB)。两组患者遵循相同的纳入和排除标准,采用徒手技术进行相同的超声引导肋间肝活检,活检后采用彩色多普勒检查进行评估;活检后随访包括6小时卧床休息和血压和心率监测,直到出院。DH患者在活检后8小时出院,如果他们居住的距离医院不超过30分钟的路程。在两组中,评估以下数据:死亡率、样本充分性、插管次数、主要和次要并发症、疼痛评分。结果:我们系列分析的数据显示,与ELB IP相比,ELB DH在发病率和死亡率方面没有根本差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of liver biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance on an outpatient basis

Objective: To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). Methods: From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. Results: The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信