{"title":"两种多用途溶液的临床接受度:含HPMC的MPS与不揉搓的柠檬酸盐MPS。","authors":"Michel Guillon, Cecile Maissa","doi":"10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the clinical performance of contact lens wear, primarily comfort and dryness during the daytime and at the end of the day, associated with the use of a multipurpose solution containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), COMPLETE ComfortPLUS (Allergan, Irvine, CA) compared to a citrate-based multi-purpose disinfecting solution used without manual rubbing, NO RUB OPTI-FREE EXPRESS (Alcon, Ft. Worth, TX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over study was conducted with 64 subjects who underwent adaptation and were planned-replacement lens wearers. Each solution was used by the subject for 1 month, with a 1-week wash-out period during which the subject's own solutions were used. When new solutions were issued, new contact lenses also were dispensed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of comfort, the primary endpoint of the study, in the evening (on a 50-point scale) was rated better with OPTI-FREE EXPRESS at the end of the 1-month period of wear (mean 39 vs. 37, P=0.03). Dryness, the most frequently reported symptom, occurred at a similar level of rating with both care systems (P >0.05). Few other clinically significant differences between the regimens were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall clinical performance of the citrate-based solution used without manual rubbing was similar to that of the solution containing HPMC. The subjective results of comfort-level and dryness with the two regimens demonstrated that the inclusion of HPMC did not provide unique performance advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"28 4","pages":"186-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing.\",\"authors\":\"Michel Guillon, Cecile Maissa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the clinical performance of contact lens wear, primarily comfort and dryness during the daytime and at the end of the day, associated with the use of a multipurpose solution containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), COMPLETE ComfortPLUS (Allergan, Irvine, CA) compared to a citrate-based multi-purpose disinfecting solution used without manual rubbing, NO RUB OPTI-FREE EXPRESS (Alcon, Ft. Worth, TX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over study was conducted with 64 subjects who underwent adaptation and were planned-replacement lens wearers. Each solution was used by the subject for 1 month, with a 1-week wash-out period during which the subject's own solutions were used. When new solutions were issued, new contact lenses also were dispensed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of comfort, the primary endpoint of the study, in the evening (on a 50-point scale) was rated better with OPTI-FREE EXPRESS at the end of the 1-month period of wear (mean 39 vs. 37, P=0.03). Dryness, the most frequently reported symptom, occurred at a similar level of rating with both care systems (P >0.05). Few other clinically significant differences between the regimens were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall clinical performance of the citrate-based solution used without manual rubbing was similar to that of the solution containing HPMC. The subjective results of comfort-level and dryness with the two regimens demonstrated that the inclusion of HPMC did not provide unique performance advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"186-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing.
Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical performance of contact lens wear, primarily comfort and dryness during the daytime and at the end of the day, associated with the use of a multipurpose solution containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), COMPLETE ComfortPLUS (Allergan, Irvine, CA) compared to a citrate-based multi-purpose disinfecting solution used without manual rubbing, NO RUB OPTI-FREE EXPRESS (Alcon, Ft. Worth, TX).
Methods: This randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over study was conducted with 64 subjects who underwent adaptation and were planned-replacement lens wearers. Each solution was used by the subject for 1 month, with a 1-week wash-out period during which the subject's own solutions were used. When new solutions were issued, new contact lenses also were dispensed.
Results: The level of comfort, the primary endpoint of the study, in the evening (on a 50-point scale) was rated better with OPTI-FREE EXPRESS at the end of the 1-month period of wear (mean 39 vs. 37, P=0.03). Dryness, the most frequently reported symptom, occurred at a similar level of rating with both care systems (P >0.05). Few other clinically significant differences between the regimens were noted.
Conclusions: The overall clinical performance of the citrate-based solution used without manual rubbing was similar to that of the solution containing HPMC. The subjective results of comfort-level and dryness with the two regimens demonstrated that the inclusion of HPMC did not provide unique performance advantages.