裂隙扫描和超声两种测厚系统的比较。

Maria Jesus Giraldez Fernandez, Alberto Diaz Rey, Alejandro Cerviño, Eva Yebra-Pimentel
{"title":"裂隙扫描和超声两种测厚系统的比较。","authors":"Maria Jesus Giraldez Fernandez,&nbsp;Alberto Diaz Rey,&nbsp;Alejandro Cerviño,&nbsp;Eva Yebra-Pimentel","doi":"10.1097/01.ICL.0000034556.15901.CC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article compares measurements of corneal thickness obtained with the Orbscan Topography System with those obtained with the ultrasonic pachymeter, when used to measure central-comeal thickness in normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Slit-scan topography (Orbscan II system, version 3.0, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) and ultrasonic pachymetry (Ophthasonic A-Scan/ Pachometer III, Accutome, Malvern, PA) were used to measure central-corneal thickness in 92 right corneas of 92 healthy adult subjects. A correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between both instruments. Measurements were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the average. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t-test. The 95% limits of agreement also were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean corneal thickness was 559.9 microm +/-3.73 SEM with the Orbscan system and 551.2 microm +/- 4.57 SEM with the ultrasonic pachymeter, values that were significantly different (paired t-test, P = 0.000). The coefficient of determination was 0.860 (y = -65.78 + 1.135 x; P = 0.000). The mean difference between the measurements from both devices was found to be significantly different from zero (mean: 8.74 microm; paired t-test; P = 0.000), with Orbscan being slightly higher than the Ophthasonic A-Scan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Orbscan system measurements of central corneal thickness were greater than ultrasonic pachymeter measurements, a difference that was statistically significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"28 4","pages":"221-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two pachymetric systems: slit-scanning and ultrasonic.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Jesus Giraldez Fernandez,&nbsp;Alberto Diaz Rey,&nbsp;Alejandro Cerviño,&nbsp;Eva Yebra-Pimentel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ICL.0000034556.15901.CC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article compares measurements of corneal thickness obtained with the Orbscan Topography System with those obtained with the ultrasonic pachymeter, when used to measure central-comeal thickness in normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Slit-scan topography (Orbscan II system, version 3.0, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) and ultrasonic pachymetry (Ophthasonic A-Scan/ Pachometer III, Accutome, Malvern, PA) were used to measure central-corneal thickness in 92 right corneas of 92 healthy adult subjects. A correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between both instruments. Measurements were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the average. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t-test. The 95% limits of agreement also were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean corneal thickness was 559.9 microm +/-3.73 SEM with the Orbscan system and 551.2 microm +/- 4.57 SEM with the ultrasonic pachymeter, values that were significantly different (paired t-test, P = 0.000). The coefficient of determination was 0.860 (y = -65.78 + 1.135 x; P = 0.000). The mean difference between the measurements from both devices was found to be significantly different from zero (mean: 8.74 microm; paired t-test; P = 0.000), with Orbscan being slightly higher than the Ophthasonic A-Scan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Orbscan system measurements of central corneal thickness were greater than ultrasonic pachymeter measurements, a difference that was statistically significantly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"221-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000034556.15901.CC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000034556.15901.CC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

目的:本文比较了用Orbscan地形测量系统测量角膜厚度与超声测厚仪测量正常受试者角膜中心厚度的结果。方法:采用裂隙扫描形貌仪(Orbscan II系统,3.0版,Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY)和超声测厚仪(ophth超声A-Scan/ Pachometer III, Accutome, Malvern, PA)测量92名健康成人的92个右角膜中央角膜厚度。使用相关分析来评估两种仪器之间的关系。还通过绘制方法与平均值之间的差异来比较测量结果。采用配对t检验检验零偏差假设。并计算了95%的一致性限度。结果:Orbscan系统测得的角膜平均厚度为559.9 μ m +/-3.73 SEM,超声测厚仪测得的角膜平均厚度为551.2 μ m +/- 4.57 SEM,差异有统计学意义(配对t检验,P = 0.000)。决定系数为0.860 (y = -65.78 + 1.135 x;P = 0.000)。两种装置测量值的平均差被发现明显不同于零(平均值:8.74微米;配对t检验;P = 0.000), Orbscan略高于超声A-Scan。结论:Orbscan系统测得的角膜中央厚度大于超声测得的角膜厚度,差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of two pachymetric systems: slit-scanning and ultrasonic.

Purpose: This article compares measurements of corneal thickness obtained with the Orbscan Topography System with those obtained with the ultrasonic pachymeter, when used to measure central-comeal thickness in normal subjects.

Methods: Slit-scan topography (Orbscan II system, version 3.0, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) and ultrasonic pachymetry (Ophthasonic A-Scan/ Pachometer III, Accutome, Malvern, PA) were used to measure central-corneal thickness in 92 right corneas of 92 healthy adult subjects. A correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between both instruments. Measurements were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the average. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t-test. The 95% limits of agreement also were calculated.

Results: The mean corneal thickness was 559.9 microm +/-3.73 SEM with the Orbscan system and 551.2 microm +/- 4.57 SEM with the ultrasonic pachymeter, values that were significantly different (paired t-test, P = 0.000). The coefficient of determination was 0.860 (y = -65.78 + 1.135 x; P = 0.000). The mean difference between the measurements from both devices was found to be significantly different from zero (mean: 8.74 microm; paired t-test; P = 0.000), with Orbscan being slightly higher than the Ophthasonic A-Scan.

Conclusions: The Orbscan system measurements of central corneal thickness were greater than ultrasonic pachymeter measurements, a difference that was statistically significantly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信