在国家骨髓捐献计划骨髓登记处保持更新的基于dna的HLA分配。

Reviews in immunogenetics Pub Date : 2000-01-01
M Maiers, C K Hurley, L Perlee, M Fernandez-Vina, J Baisch, D Cook, P Fraser, U Heine, S Hsu, M S Leffell, D Mauer, H Noreen, T Tang, M Trucco, S Y Yang, R J Hartzman, M Setterholm, T Winden, D Shepherd, J Hegland
{"title":"在国家骨髓捐献计划骨髓登记处保持更新的基于dna的HLA分配。","authors":"M Maiers,&nbsp;C K Hurley,&nbsp;L Perlee,&nbsp;M Fernandez-Vina,&nbsp;J Baisch,&nbsp;D Cook,&nbsp;P Fraser,&nbsp;U Heine,&nbsp;S Hsu,&nbsp;M S Leffell,&nbsp;D Mauer,&nbsp;H Noreen,&nbsp;T Tang,&nbsp;M Trucco,&nbsp;S Y Yang,&nbsp;R J Hartzman,&nbsp;M Setterholm,&nbsp;T Winden,&nbsp;D Shepherd,&nbsp;J Hegland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has instituted an approach to address the impact of new alleles on the DNA-based HLA assignments obtained during volunteer donor typing. This approach was applied to the DRB typing results from 371,187 donors received from 14 laboratories in 1999. Samples were tested with a standardized set of sequence specific oligonucleotide reagents and the positive and negative hybridization results transmitted electronically to the NMDP. A software program interpreted the primary data into HLA assignments and rejected assignments which did not produce a result at the specified level of resolution. Comparison of the HLA assignments derived by the NMDP software to the assignments made by the laboratories using several local software prograins showed 90.5% of the assignments to be identical. Differences in assignments were explained by varying levels of typing resolution, variation in the inclusion of the second expressed DRB loci, disparity arising when alternative assignments were summarized, and failure to submit correct information. When the primary data collected in 1999 were interpreted into HLA assignments using the set of alleles defined in July 2000, 74% of the HLA-DRB assignments were altered by the description of new alleles, justifying the development of this software.</p>","PeriodicalId":82484,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in immunogenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining updated DNA-based HLA assignments in the National Marrow Donor Program Bone Marrow Registry.\",\"authors\":\"M Maiers,&nbsp;C K Hurley,&nbsp;L Perlee,&nbsp;M Fernandez-Vina,&nbsp;J Baisch,&nbsp;D Cook,&nbsp;P Fraser,&nbsp;U Heine,&nbsp;S Hsu,&nbsp;M S Leffell,&nbsp;D Mauer,&nbsp;H Noreen,&nbsp;T Tang,&nbsp;M Trucco,&nbsp;S Y Yang,&nbsp;R J Hartzman,&nbsp;M Setterholm,&nbsp;T Winden,&nbsp;D Shepherd,&nbsp;J Hegland\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has instituted an approach to address the impact of new alleles on the DNA-based HLA assignments obtained during volunteer donor typing. This approach was applied to the DRB typing results from 371,187 donors received from 14 laboratories in 1999. Samples were tested with a standardized set of sequence specific oligonucleotide reagents and the positive and negative hybridization results transmitted electronically to the NMDP. A software program interpreted the primary data into HLA assignments and rejected assignments which did not produce a result at the specified level of resolution. Comparison of the HLA assignments derived by the NMDP software to the assignments made by the laboratories using several local software prograins showed 90.5% of the assignments to be identical. Differences in assignments were explained by varying levels of typing resolution, variation in the inclusion of the second expressed DRB loci, disparity arising when alternative assignments were summarized, and failure to submit correct information. When the primary data collected in 1999 were interpreted into HLA assignments using the set of alleles defined in July 2000, 74% of the HLA-DRB assignments were altered by the description of new alleles, justifying the development of this software.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in immunogenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in immunogenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in immunogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家骨髓捐献计划(NMDP)已经建立了一种方法来解决新等位基因对志愿者捐献分型过程中获得的基于dna的HLA分配的影响。1999年,对来自14个实验室的371187名献血者的DRB分型结果采用了这种方法。样品用一套标准化的序列特异性寡核苷酸试剂进行检测,阳性和阴性杂交结果通过电子传输到NMDP。一个软件程序将原始数据解释为HLA分配,并拒绝那些不能产生指定分辨率水平结果的分配。将NMDP软件得到的HLA值与实验室用几个本地软件程序得到的HLA值进行比较,结果表明90.5%的HLA值是相同的。不同的分型分辨率、包含第二个表达的DRB基因座的差异、总结替代分配时产生的差异以及未能提交正确的信息可以解释分配的差异。当使用2000年7月定义的一组等位基因将1999年收集的原始数据解释为HLA分配时,74%的HLA- drb分配被新等位基因的描述所改变,证明了开发该软件的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintaining updated DNA-based HLA assignments in the National Marrow Donor Program Bone Marrow Registry.

The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has instituted an approach to address the impact of new alleles on the DNA-based HLA assignments obtained during volunteer donor typing. This approach was applied to the DRB typing results from 371,187 donors received from 14 laboratories in 1999. Samples were tested with a standardized set of sequence specific oligonucleotide reagents and the positive and negative hybridization results transmitted electronically to the NMDP. A software program interpreted the primary data into HLA assignments and rejected assignments which did not produce a result at the specified level of resolution. Comparison of the HLA assignments derived by the NMDP software to the assignments made by the laboratories using several local software prograins showed 90.5% of the assignments to be identical. Differences in assignments were explained by varying levels of typing resolution, variation in the inclusion of the second expressed DRB loci, disparity arising when alternative assignments were summarized, and failure to submit correct information. When the primary data collected in 1999 were interpreted into HLA assignments using the set of alleles defined in July 2000, 74% of the HLA-DRB assignments were altered by the description of new alleles, justifying the development of this software.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信