安全套破损研究。

Popline Pub Date : 1992-01-01
{"title":"安全套破损研究。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>4 specific reasons why condoms--even those of high quality--break have been identified following a series of studies in 8 countries among 1700 people. According to the studies, breakage falls into 4 general categories: incorrect methods of putting on condoms, use of oil-based lubricants, reuse of condoms, and duration or intensity of coitus. The studies, conducted by Family Health International, a North Carolina based contraceptive research and AIDS prevention organization, was the 1st large scale effort to examine condom breakage. Used properly and consistently, condoms are considered to be highly reliable for prevention of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. An estimated 40 million couples worldwide currently use condoms for pregnancy prevention. The studies found that human factors caused condoms to break at rates that ranged up to 13%, with a 4-5% average breakage rate reported at most sites. Preliminary research data indicate that the vast majority of condom users very seldom experienced condom failure. Past condom \"failure,\" as defined by the number of accidental pregnancies among US couples who used condoms for contraception, was estimated at 12% (12 of 100 couples using condoms for 1 year will experience a pregnancy). But the 12% failure rate was attributable primarily to nonuse or inconsistent use of condoms, not breakage. \"W now have some guideposts as to what types of behavior lead to breakage,\" said Dr. Nancy Williamson, director of Family Health International's program evaluation division, which directed the studies. \"We need to inform condom users and providers about which errors users make.\" The studies provide an important cross-cultural data base on condom use. \"The causes of condom breakage were usually associated with individual behavior, not with culturally based practices,\" said Dr. Williamson. the 8 countries where the studies were conducted are: Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Sri Lanka, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Mexico.</p>","PeriodicalId":85299,"journal":{"name":"Popline","volume":"14 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Condom breakage studied.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>4 specific reasons why condoms--even those of high quality--break have been identified following a series of studies in 8 countries among 1700 people. According to the studies, breakage falls into 4 general categories: incorrect methods of putting on condoms, use of oil-based lubricants, reuse of condoms, and duration or intensity of coitus. The studies, conducted by Family Health International, a North Carolina based contraceptive research and AIDS prevention organization, was the 1st large scale effort to examine condom breakage. Used properly and consistently, condoms are considered to be highly reliable for prevention of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. An estimated 40 million couples worldwide currently use condoms for pregnancy prevention. The studies found that human factors caused condoms to break at rates that ranged up to 13%, with a 4-5% average breakage rate reported at most sites. Preliminary research data indicate that the vast majority of condom users very seldom experienced condom failure. Past condom \\\"failure,\\\" as defined by the number of accidental pregnancies among US couples who used condoms for contraception, was estimated at 12% (12 of 100 couples using condoms for 1 year will experience a pregnancy). But the 12% failure rate was attributable primarily to nonuse or inconsistent use of condoms, not breakage. \\\"W now have some guideposts as to what types of behavior lead to breakage,\\\" said Dr. Nancy Williamson, director of Family Health International's program evaluation division, which directed the studies. \\\"We need to inform condom users and providers about which errors users make.\\\" The studies provide an important cross-cultural data base on condom use. \\\"The causes of condom breakage were usually associated with individual behavior, not with culturally based practices,\\\" said Dr. Williamson. the 8 countries where the studies were conducted are: Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Sri Lanka, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Mexico.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Popline\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Popline\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popline","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对8个国家的1700人进行的一系列研究中,发现了避孕套破裂的4个具体原因,即使是高质量的避孕套也会破裂。根据研究,破损可分为四大类:不正确的戴套方法、使用油基润滑剂、重复使用避孕套、性交持续时间或强度。这项研究是由北卡罗莱纳州的避孕研究和艾滋病预防组织家庭健康国际组织进行的,是第一次大规模研究避孕套破损情况。正确和持续使用避孕套被认为是预防怀孕和性传播疾病的高度可靠的方法。据估计,目前全世界有4000万对夫妇使用避孕套来预防怀孕。研究发现,人为因素导致避孕套的破损率高达13%,而大多数网站报告的平均破损率为4-5%。初步研究数据表明,绝大多数避孕套使用者很少经历避孕套失效。根据美国使用避孕套避孕的夫妇中意外怀孕的数量来定义,过去的避孕套“失败”估计为12%(100对使用避孕套1年的夫妇中有12对会怀孕)。但12%的失败率主要是由于不使用或不一致使用避孕套,而不是破损。“我们现在有了一些指导方针,告诉我们什么样的行为会导致破裂,”家庭健康国际项目评估部主任南希·威廉姆森(Nancy Williamson)博士说,她指导了这些研究。“我们需要告知安全套使用者和提供者,使用者会犯哪些错误。”这些研究为安全套的使用提供了重要的跨文化数据基础。威廉姆森博士说:“避孕套破裂的原因通常与个人行为有关,而与文化习俗无关。”进行研究的8个国家是:加纳、肯尼亚、马里、斯里兰卡、多米尼加共和国、牙买加和墨西哥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Condom breakage studied.

4 specific reasons why condoms--even those of high quality--break have been identified following a series of studies in 8 countries among 1700 people. According to the studies, breakage falls into 4 general categories: incorrect methods of putting on condoms, use of oil-based lubricants, reuse of condoms, and duration or intensity of coitus. The studies, conducted by Family Health International, a North Carolina based contraceptive research and AIDS prevention organization, was the 1st large scale effort to examine condom breakage. Used properly and consistently, condoms are considered to be highly reliable for prevention of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. An estimated 40 million couples worldwide currently use condoms for pregnancy prevention. The studies found that human factors caused condoms to break at rates that ranged up to 13%, with a 4-5% average breakage rate reported at most sites. Preliminary research data indicate that the vast majority of condom users very seldom experienced condom failure. Past condom "failure," as defined by the number of accidental pregnancies among US couples who used condoms for contraception, was estimated at 12% (12 of 100 couples using condoms for 1 year will experience a pregnancy). But the 12% failure rate was attributable primarily to nonuse or inconsistent use of condoms, not breakage. "W now have some guideposts as to what types of behavior lead to breakage," said Dr. Nancy Williamson, director of Family Health International's program evaluation division, which directed the studies. "We need to inform condom users and providers about which errors users make." The studies provide an important cross-cultural data base on condom use. "The causes of condom breakage were usually associated with individual behavior, not with culturally based practices," said Dr. Williamson. the 8 countries where the studies were conducted are: Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Sri Lanka, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Mexico.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信