众议院为人口拨款3.3亿美元。

Popline Pub Date : 1992-07-01
{"title":"众议院为人口拨款3.3亿美元。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of $330 million for international population assistance has been approved by the US House of Representatives in the foreign operations appropriations bill for fiscal 1993. The legislation, which includes $20 million for the UNFPA, is expected to be considered by the Senate in the late summer or early autumn. The bill stipulated that the amount earmarked for UNFPA must be used solely for the provision of FDA-approved contraceptives and related logistics. Other restrictions placed on the funds specify that; none of the funds may be used in the People's Republic of China; they must be placed in a separate account and not co-mingled with any other funds; they may not be use to carry out any program, project or activity disapproved by the US Ambassador to the UN; the full amount must be refunded if UNFPA provides more than $57 million for its 5-year family planning program in china that began in 1990 and for which funds already have been committed. Once the largest donor to UNFPA, the US government has not contributed to the Fund since 1985 after the Reagan Administration and antifamily planning forces in Congress lashed out against UNFPA for its support of the allegedly coercive Chinese national family planning program. 2 USAID probes were unable to trace UNFPA funds to the forced abortions the Chinese government program was charged with encouraging and carrying out. Nevertheless, after Congress approved the 1989 foreign operations bill with $15 million earmarked for UNFPA, President Bush vetoed the measure. In his veto message, the President said that UNFPA \"participates in and strongly defends the program of a particular foreign government which relies heavily upon compulsory abortion.\" Pointing out that UNFPA has received no US assistance since 1985 \"precisely because of its involvement in this coercive abortion policy,\" Bush said the 1989 bill represented \"a radical and unwarranted change in policy.\" Although the President failed to name the country that \"relies heavily upon compulsory abortion\" congressional opponents of refunding UNFPA singled out China as that country. The Chinese government has repeatedly issued official denials that force or coercion are involved in its population policy or programs. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been pushing hard for Congress to grant most favored nation trade status to China, UNFPA is the largest multilateral agency providing population assistance to developing countries. But Dr. Nafis Sadik, executive director of the Fund, says that \"requests for assistance from all regions have mounted to a level that can no longer be met by our organization.\" She pointed out that the demand for UNFPA support already exceeds the Fund's resources by $500 million. Additionally, she said, many countries--particularly in sub-Saharan Africa--want to expand their current population programs, and new requests are coming from the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Baltic States, and Eastern Europe. More than 100 countries contribute to UNFPA, but most of the Fund's resources are derived from a handful of donors--Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":85299,"journal":{"name":"Popline","volume":"14 ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"House okays $330 million for population.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A total of $330 million for international population assistance has been approved by the US House of Representatives in the foreign operations appropriations bill for fiscal 1993. The legislation, which includes $20 million for the UNFPA, is expected to be considered by the Senate in the late summer or early autumn. The bill stipulated that the amount earmarked for UNFPA must be used solely for the provision of FDA-approved contraceptives and related logistics. Other restrictions placed on the funds specify that; none of the funds may be used in the People's Republic of China; they must be placed in a separate account and not co-mingled with any other funds; they may not be use to carry out any program, project or activity disapproved by the US Ambassador to the UN; the full amount must be refunded if UNFPA provides more than $57 million for its 5-year family planning program in china that began in 1990 and for which funds already have been committed. Once the largest donor to UNFPA, the US government has not contributed to the Fund since 1985 after the Reagan Administration and antifamily planning forces in Congress lashed out against UNFPA for its support of the allegedly coercive Chinese national family planning program. 2 USAID probes were unable to trace UNFPA funds to the forced abortions the Chinese government program was charged with encouraging and carrying out. Nevertheless, after Congress approved the 1989 foreign operations bill with $15 million earmarked for UNFPA, President Bush vetoed the measure. In his veto message, the President said that UNFPA \\\"participates in and strongly defends the program of a particular foreign government which relies heavily upon compulsory abortion.\\\" Pointing out that UNFPA has received no US assistance since 1985 \\\"precisely because of its involvement in this coercive abortion policy,\\\" Bush said the 1989 bill represented \\\"a radical and unwarranted change in policy.\\\" Although the President failed to name the country that \\\"relies heavily upon compulsory abortion\\\" congressional opponents of refunding UNFPA singled out China as that country. The Chinese government has repeatedly issued official denials that force or coercion are involved in its population policy or programs. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been pushing hard for Congress to grant most favored nation trade status to China, UNFPA is the largest multilateral agency providing population assistance to developing countries. But Dr. Nafis Sadik, executive director of the Fund, says that \\\"requests for assistance from all regions have mounted to a level that can no longer be met by our organization.\\\" She pointed out that the demand for UNFPA support already exceeds the Fund's resources by $500 million. Additionally, she said, many countries--particularly in sub-Saharan Africa--want to expand their current population programs, and new requests are coming from the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Baltic States, and Eastern Europe. More than 100 countries contribute to UNFPA, but most of the Fund's resources are derived from a handful of donors--Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Canada.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Popline\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Popline\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popline","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国众议院在1993财政年度的对外行动拨款法案中为国际人口援助核可了总共3.3亿美元。这项立法包括为人口基金提供2000万美元,预计参议院将在夏末或秋初审议这项立法。该法案规定,指定用于人口基金的款项必须仅用于提供经食品和药物管理局批准的避孕药具和相关后勤。对基金施加的其他限制规定:不得在中华人民共和国境内使用;必须单独设立账户,不得与其他资金混用;不得用于执行美国驻联合国大使不赞成的任何计划、项目或活动;如果联合国人口基金为其1990年开始的中国五年计划生育方案提供超过5700万美元的资金,并且已经为该方案承诺了资金,则必须全额退还。美国政府曾是联合国人口基金的最大捐助国,但自从1985年里根政府和国会中反对计划生育的势力猛烈抨击联合国人口基金支持所谓强制性的中国国家计划生育项目后,美国政府就再也没有向该基金提供过捐款。美国国际开发署的调查无法追踪到联合国人口基金的资金与中国政府被指控鼓励和实施的强制堕胎有关。尽管如此,1989年国会通过了为联合国人口基金拨款1500万美元的对外行动法案后,布什总统否决了该法案。总统在否决声明中说,联合国人口基金“参与并坚决捍卫某个严重依赖强制堕胎的外国政府的项目”。布什指出,联合国人口基金自1985年以来一直没有得到美国的援助,"正是因为它参与了这种强制性的堕胎政策"。他说,1989年的法案代表了"一种激进和毫无根据的政策改变"。尽管总统没有指出“严重依赖强制堕胎”的国家,但反对重新资助联合国人口基金的国会人士把中国列为这个国家。中国政府多次发布官方声明,否认其人口政策或计划涉及武力或胁迫。与此同时,布什政府一直在努力推动国会给予中国最惠国贸易地位,联合国人口基金是向发展中国家提供人口援助的最大多边机构。但基金组织执行主任纳菲斯·萨迪克博士说,“来自所有地区的援助请求已经达到了我们组织无法满足的水平。”她指出,对人口基金支助的需求已经超过该基金的资源5亿美元。此外,她说,许多国家,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲国家,希望扩大现有的人口项目,独联体、波罗的海国家和东欧国家也提出了新的要求。100多个国家向人口基金捐款,但基金的大部分资源来自少数捐助国——日本、荷兰、挪威、芬兰、德国、瑞典、丹麦、联合王国和加拿大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
House okays $330 million for population.

A total of $330 million for international population assistance has been approved by the US House of Representatives in the foreign operations appropriations bill for fiscal 1993. The legislation, which includes $20 million for the UNFPA, is expected to be considered by the Senate in the late summer or early autumn. The bill stipulated that the amount earmarked for UNFPA must be used solely for the provision of FDA-approved contraceptives and related logistics. Other restrictions placed on the funds specify that; none of the funds may be used in the People's Republic of China; they must be placed in a separate account and not co-mingled with any other funds; they may not be use to carry out any program, project or activity disapproved by the US Ambassador to the UN; the full amount must be refunded if UNFPA provides more than $57 million for its 5-year family planning program in china that began in 1990 and for which funds already have been committed. Once the largest donor to UNFPA, the US government has not contributed to the Fund since 1985 after the Reagan Administration and antifamily planning forces in Congress lashed out against UNFPA for its support of the allegedly coercive Chinese national family planning program. 2 USAID probes were unable to trace UNFPA funds to the forced abortions the Chinese government program was charged with encouraging and carrying out. Nevertheless, after Congress approved the 1989 foreign operations bill with $15 million earmarked for UNFPA, President Bush vetoed the measure. In his veto message, the President said that UNFPA "participates in and strongly defends the program of a particular foreign government which relies heavily upon compulsory abortion." Pointing out that UNFPA has received no US assistance since 1985 "precisely because of its involvement in this coercive abortion policy," Bush said the 1989 bill represented "a radical and unwarranted change in policy." Although the President failed to name the country that "relies heavily upon compulsory abortion" congressional opponents of refunding UNFPA singled out China as that country. The Chinese government has repeatedly issued official denials that force or coercion are involved in its population policy or programs. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has been pushing hard for Congress to grant most favored nation trade status to China, UNFPA is the largest multilateral agency providing population assistance to developing countries. But Dr. Nafis Sadik, executive director of the Fund, says that "requests for assistance from all regions have mounted to a level that can no longer be met by our organization." She pointed out that the demand for UNFPA support already exceeds the Fund's resources by $500 million. Additionally, she said, many countries--particularly in sub-Saharan Africa--want to expand their current population programs, and new requests are coming from the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Baltic States, and Eastern Europe. More than 100 countries contribute to UNFPA, but most of the Fund's resources are derived from a handful of donors--Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Finland, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信