{"title":"一项比较三种iucd (Multiload Copper 250、Copper t200和Lippes Loop C)性能的临床研究。","authors":"M M Fakhr, D M Fakhr, A A Hassan, N M Nasser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.</p>","PeriodicalId":85328,"journal":{"name":"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)","volume":"8 ","pages":"39-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).\",\"authors\":\"M M Fakhr, D M Fakhr, A A Hassan, N M Nasser\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"39-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
开罗Al-Zahraa医院的300名妇女,使用三种不同宫内节育器(CuT 200、多负荷Cu250和Lippes环尺寸C)中的一种,比较三组之间遇到的并发症发生率。Cu T200组置入失败率最高,为3.24/HWY,百妇女年。意外怀孕在这一群体中也是最高的。与ML Cu250组的1.10/HWY相比,ML Cu250组的发生率为2.16/HWY,而Lippes Loop组的发生率为零。Cu T200和Lippes Loop的自然排出率相同,分别为4.32/HWY和4.44/HWY,而两组的自然排出率为1.10。ML Cu250的HWY。在ML Cu250使用者中,因疼痛或出血而拔除的比率最高,为4.41。相比之下,Lippes Loop组为3.33/HWY, Cu T200组为1.08/HWY。ML Cu250组的总失败率为8.82/HWY, Cu T200组为11.89/HWY, Lippes Loop组为11.10/HWY。
A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.