一项比较三种iucd (Multiload Copper 250、Copper t200和Lippes Loop C)性能的临床研究。

Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt) Pub Date : 1988-01-01
M M Fakhr, D M Fakhr, A A Hassan, N M Nasser
{"title":"一项比较三种iucd (Multiload Copper 250、Copper t200和Lippes Loop C)性能的临床研究。","authors":"M M Fakhr,&nbsp;D M Fakhr,&nbsp;A A Hassan,&nbsp;N M Nasser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.</p>","PeriodicalId":85328,"journal":{"name":"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)","volume":"8 ","pages":"39-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).\",\"authors\":\"M M Fakhr,&nbsp;D M Fakhr,&nbsp;A A Hassan,&nbsp;N M Nasser\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"39-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population sciences (Cairo, Egypt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开罗Al-Zahraa医院的300名妇女,使用三种不同宫内节育器(CuT 200、多负荷Cu250和Lippes环尺寸C)中的一种,比较三组之间遇到的并发症发生率。Cu T200组置入失败率最高,为3.24/HWY,百妇女年。意外怀孕在这一群体中也是最高的。与ML Cu250组的1.10/HWY相比,ML Cu250组的发生率为2.16/HWY,而Lippes Loop组的发生率为零。Cu T200和Lippes Loop的自然排出率相同,分别为4.32/HWY和4.44/HWY,而两组的自然排出率为1.10。ML Cu250的HWY。在ML Cu250使用者中,因疼痛或出血而拔除的比率最高,为4.41。相比之下,Lippes Loop组为3.33/HWY, Cu T200组为1.08/HWY。ML Cu250组的总失败率为8.82/HWY, Cu T200组为11.89/HWY, Lippes Loop组为11.10/HWY。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).

300 Women at Cairo's Al-Zahraa Hospital, using 1 of 3 different IUds (CuT 200, multiload Cu250, and Lippes loop size C) to compare the rate of complications encountered among the 3 groups. Failed insertion was highest among the Cu T200 group with a rate of 3.24/HWY, hundred woman years. Accidental pregnancy was highest among that group as well. With a rate 2.16/HWY compared with 1.10/HWY among the ML Cu250 group and none among the Lippes Loop group. The spontaneous expulsion rate was the same for the Cu T200 and Lippes Loop, i.e., the rate was 4.32/HWY and 4.44/HWY for the 2 groups, respectively, compared with 1.10.HWY for the ML Cu250. The highest removal rate because of pain or bleeding was encountered among the ML Cu250 users, i.e., the rate was 4.41.HWY compared with 3.33/HWY among the Lippes Loop group and 1.08/HWY for the Cu T200 group. The overall failure rate was 8.82/HWY for ML Cu250, 11.89/HWY for Cu T200, and 11.10/HWY for the Lippes Loop group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信