接受单侧扩大单侧乳房切除术的医疗保险患者的乳腺癌病理实践。

Pascal James Imperato, Jerry Waisman, Marcia Wallen, Christine C Llewellyn, Veronica Pryor
{"title":"接受单侧扩大单侧乳房切除术的医疗保险患者的乳腺癌病理实践。","authors":"Pascal James Imperato,&nbsp;Jerry Waisman,&nbsp;Marcia Wallen,&nbsp;Christine C Llewellyn,&nbsp;Veronica Pryor","doi":"10.1089/152460902760277895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Information in pathology reports of breast cancer specimens is of critical importance to treating physicians for selection of local regional treatment and adjuvant therapy, evaluation of therapy, estimation of prognosis, and analysis of outcomes. This information is also of great importance to patients and their families. The Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP) have published protocols for reporting the findings on breast cancer specimens to encourage adequate specimen examination and promote the reporting of findings in standardized formats and to provide treating physicians and their patients with vital information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the quality of breast cancer pathology practices and the degree to which they agree with published guidelines, we undertook a retrospective analysis among Medicare patients in New York State. Our random sample consisted of 748 (43.5%) of the 1718 cases of unilateral extended simple mastectomy, also referred to as total mastectomy with lymph node dissection (ICD-9-CM procedure code 85.43), for calendar year 1999. Of these, 555 (74.2%) were available for study, whereas the rest did not satisfy inclusion criteria. Among the 555 cases, 545 (98.2%) were women, and 10 (1.8%) were men. The gender distribution was proportionately the same at 98.2% and 1.8% for all 1718 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined the 555 hospital records for 16 elements (quality indicators). Aggregate performance on 7 of these was > or =83.7%, and performance was < or = 69.4% on 9 others. There were significant interhospital disparities in performance levels for a number of quality indicators. Although some hospitals always recorded certain indicators, others never did.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The issues with breast cancer pathology reports identified in this study are amenable to improvement to better serve patients, especially women, and their treating physicians in making adjuvant decisions, estimating prognosis, and evaluating outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/152460902760277895","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer pathology practices among Medicare patients undergoing unilateral extended simple mastectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Pascal James Imperato,&nbsp;Jerry Waisman,&nbsp;Marcia Wallen,&nbsp;Christine C Llewellyn,&nbsp;Veronica Pryor\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/152460902760277895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Information in pathology reports of breast cancer specimens is of critical importance to treating physicians for selection of local regional treatment and adjuvant therapy, evaluation of therapy, estimation of prognosis, and analysis of outcomes. This information is also of great importance to patients and their families. The Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP) have published protocols for reporting the findings on breast cancer specimens to encourage adequate specimen examination and promote the reporting of findings in standardized formats and to provide treating physicians and their patients with vital information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the quality of breast cancer pathology practices and the degree to which they agree with published guidelines, we undertook a retrospective analysis among Medicare patients in New York State. Our random sample consisted of 748 (43.5%) of the 1718 cases of unilateral extended simple mastectomy, also referred to as total mastectomy with lymph node dissection (ICD-9-CM procedure code 85.43), for calendar year 1999. Of these, 555 (74.2%) were available for study, whereas the rest did not satisfy inclusion criteria. Among the 555 cases, 545 (98.2%) were women, and 10 (1.8%) were men. The gender distribution was proportionately the same at 98.2% and 1.8% for all 1718 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined the 555 hospital records for 16 elements (quality indicators). Aggregate performance on 7 of these was > or =83.7%, and performance was < or = 69.4% on 9 others. There were significant interhospital disparities in performance levels for a number of quality indicators. Although some hospitals always recorded certain indicators, others never did.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The issues with breast cancer pathology reports identified in this study are amenable to improvement to better serve patients, especially women, and their treating physicians in making adjuvant decisions, estimating prognosis, and evaluating outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/152460902760277895\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902760277895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902760277895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:乳腺癌标本病理报告中的信息对治疗医师选择局部治疗和辅助治疗、评价治疗、估计预后和分析结果具有重要意义。这些信息对患者及其家属也非常重要。美国病理学家学会癌症委员会(CAP)和解剖与外科病理学主任协会(ADASP)发布了报告乳腺癌标本结果的协议,以鼓励充分的标本检查,促进以标准化格式报告结果,并为治疗医生及其患者提供重要信息。方法:为了评估乳腺癌病理实践的质量及其与已发表指南的一致程度,我们对纽约州的医疗保险患者进行了回顾性分析。我们的随机样本包括1999年1718例单侧扩大单侧乳房切除术中的748例(43.5%),也称为淋巴结清扫全乳切除术(ICD-9-CM程序代码85.43)。其中555例(74.2%)可用于研究,其余未满足纳入标准。555例中,女性545例(98.2%),男性10例(1.8%)。在所有1718例中,性别分布比例相同,分别为98.2%和1.8%。结果:对555份医院病历的16个要素(质量指标)进行了检查。其中7个项目的总绩效> or =83.7%,另外9个项目的绩效< or = 69.4%。在一些质量指标的表现水平上,医院间存在显著差异。虽然一些医院总是记录某些指标,但其他医院从未记录。结论:在本研究中发现的乳腺癌病理报告的问题是可以改进的,以便更好地为患者,特别是妇女,及其治疗医生做出辅助决策,估计预后和评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast cancer pathology practices among Medicare patients undergoing unilateral extended simple mastectomy.

Objective: Information in pathology reports of breast cancer specimens is of critical importance to treating physicians for selection of local regional treatment and adjuvant therapy, evaluation of therapy, estimation of prognosis, and analysis of outcomes. This information is also of great importance to patients and their families. The Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP) have published protocols for reporting the findings on breast cancer specimens to encourage adequate specimen examination and promote the reporting of findings in standardized formats and to provide treating physicians and their patients with vital information.

Methods: To assess the quality of breast cancer pathology practices and the degree to which they agree with published guidelines, we undertook a retrospective analysis among Medicare patients in New York State. Our random sample consisted of 748 (43.5%) of the 1718 cases of unilateral extended simple mastectomy, also referred to as total mastectomy with lymph node dissection (ICD-9-CM procedure code 85.43), for calendar year 1999. Of these, 555 (74.2%) were available for study, whereas the rest did not satisfy inclusion criteria. Among the 555 cases, 545 (98.2%) were women, and 10 (1.8%) were men. The gender distribution was proportionately the same at 98.2% and 1.8% for all 1718 cases.

Results: We examined the 555 hospital records for 16 elements (quality indicators). Aggregate performance on 7 of these was > or =83.7%, and performance was < or = 69.4% on 9 others. There were significant interhospital disparities in performance levels for a number of quality indicators. Although some hospitals always recorded certain indicators, others never did.

Conclusions: The issues with breast cancer pathology reports identified in this study are amenable to improvement to better serve patients, especially women, and their treating physicians in making adjuvant decisions, estimating prognosis, and evaluating outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信