微波热疗治疗慢性尿潴留患者。

Techniques in urology Pub Date : 2000-12-01
B Djavan, R Wammack, K Ghawidel, S Alavi, C Hasenzagel, P Dobronski, A Stoklosa, T Jakubcky, A Borkowski, M Marberger
{"title":"微波热疗治疗慢性尿潴留患者。","authors":"B Djavan,&nbsp;R Wammack,&nbsp;K Ghawidel,&nbsp;S Alavi,&nbsp;C Hasenzagel,&nbsp;P Dobronski,&nbsp;A Stoklosa,&nbsp;T Jakubcky,&nbsp;A Borkowski,&nbsp;M Marberger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention (CUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 29 patients with CUR due to BPH underwent high-energy TUMT. Prior to treatment and during a 12-week follow-up, the following parameters were determined: quality of life (QOL) score, peak flow rate (Qmax) by uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine (PVR). In those with treatment failure (PVR > 150 mL or urinary retention), pressure-flow studies were performed and compared to pre-TUMT urodynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 patients, 21 (72%) regained the ability to void spontaneously at 5 weeks. The actuarial median time for spontaneous voiding to be restored was 3.5 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-4.8 weeks). Mean QOL score at 12 weeks post-TUMT (2.2; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) was lower than that at 1 week (4.6; 95% CI 3.9-5.8) by 51% (p < 0.0005). Further, a 55% increase in mean Qmax (p < .0005) determined by uroflowmetry was observed by 12 weeks vs. 1 week after high-energy TUMT. TUMT failed in 8 patients due to a hypocontractile detrusor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that high-energy TUMT is a potentially useful option for patient with CUR who are not candidates for prostatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79536,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in urology","volume":"6 4","pages":"278-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microwave thermotherapy in patients with chronic urinary retention.\",\"authors\":\"B Djavan,&nbsp;R Wammack,&nbsp;K Ghawidel,&nbsp;S Alavi,&nbsp;C Hasenzagel,&nbsp;P Dobronski,&nbsp;A Stoklosa,&nbsp;T Jakubcky,&nbsp;A Borkowski,&nbsp;M Marberger\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention (CUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 29 patients with CUR due to BPH underwent high-energy TUMT. Prior to treatment and during a 12-week follow-up, the following parameters were determined: quality of life (QOL) score, peak flow rate (Qmax) by uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine (PVR). In those with treatment failure (PVR > 150 mL or urinary retention), pressure-flow studies were performed and compared to pre-TUMT urodynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 patients, 21 (72%) regained the ability to void spontaneously at 5 weeks. The actuarial median time for spontaneous voiding to be restored was 3.5 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-4.8 weeks). Mean QOL score at 12 weeks post-TUMT (2.2; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) was lower than that at 1 week (4.6; 95% CI 3.9-5.8) by 51% (p < 0.0005). Further, a 55% increase in mean Qmax (p < .0005) determined by uroflowmetry was observed by 12 weeks vs. 1 week after high-energy TUMT. TUMT failed in 8 patients due to a hypocontractile detrusor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that high-energy TUMT is a potentially useful option for patient with CUR who are not candidates for prostatectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in urology\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"278-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价高能经尿道微波热疗(TUMT)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)所致慢性尿潴留(CUR)的疗效。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,29例因前列腺增生引起的CUR患者接受了高能TUMT治疗。在治疗前和12周的随访期间,测定了以下参数:生活质量(QOL)评分、尿流法测定的峰值流速(Qmax)和空后残留尿(PVR)。在治疗失败(PVR > 150ml或尿潴留)的患者中,进行压力-流量研究,并与tumt前的尿动力学进行比较。结果:29例患者中,21例(72%)在5周时恢复了自发排空的能力。自然排尿恢复的精算中位时间为3.5周(95%可信区间[CI] 2.9-4.8周)。tumt后12周的平均生活质量评分(2.2;95% CI 1.5-2.7)低于1周时(4.6;95% CI 3.9-5.8)比51% (p < 0.0005)。此外,高能量TUMT后12周与1周相比,尿流法测定的平均Qmax增加了55% (p < .0005)。由于逼尿肌收缩不足,8例患者TUMT失败。结论:我们得出结论,高能TUMT对于不适合前列腺切除术的CUR患者是一个潜在的有用选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microwave thermotherapy in patients with chronic urinary retention.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention (CUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study, 29 patients with CUR due to BPH underwent high-energy TUMT. Prior to treatment and during a 12-week follow-up, the following parameters were determined: quality of life (QOL) score, peak flow rate (Qmax) by uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine (PVR). In those with treatment failure (PVR > 150 mL or urinary retention), pressure-flow studies were performed and compared to pre-TUMT urodynamics.

Results: Of the 29 patients, 21 (72%) regained the ability to void spontaneously at 5 weeks. The actuarial median time for spontaneous voiding to be restored was 3.5 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-4.8 weeks). Mean QOL score at 12 weeks post-TUMT (2.2; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) was lower than that at 1 week (4.6; 95% CI 3.9-5.8) by 51% (p < 0.0005). Further, a 55% increase in mean Qmax (p < .0005) determined by uroflowmetry was observed by 12 weeks vs. 1 week after high-energy TUMT. TUMT failed in 8 patients due to a hypocontractile detrusor.

Conclusions: We concluded that high-energy TUMT is a potentially useful option for patient with CUR who are not candidates for prostatectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信