{"title":"内部不稳定性:当前微卫星不稳定性分析中的问题","authors":"Yoshihiko Maehara , Shinya Oda , Keizo Sugimachi","doi":"10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00061-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Microsatellite<span><span> instability is regarded as one of the phenotypes of defective DNA mismatch repair and, consequently, as a marker of high risk for cancer. Despite numerous studies, the reported rates for positive microsatellite instability differ widely in each human malignancy. These discrepancies may relate to problems in the methods used. To establish a methodology for an accurate microsatellite instability analysis, technical requirements for a precise assay and biological conditions required for positive microsatellite instability were discussed. First, to describe microsatellite changes in detail, a </span>sensitive detection system with linear detection characteristics and </span></span>electrophoresis<span><span> with standardised migration and minimised migration errors are considered to be necessary. Therefore, systems using fluorescent labelling and laser scanning are recommended. For reproducible </span>polymerase chain reactions<span>, it is essential to control the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase activity in </span></span></span><em>Taq</em> polymerase. Second, as a biological condition for positive microsatellite instability, feasible selection and combination of microsatellite markers, mutations in specific DNA mismatch repair genes and existence of monoclonal populations enriched sufficiently in a sample are essential. Finally, one possible diagnostic criterion for positive microsatellite instability is proposed, that is the existence of one of the patterns shown in the panel (see <span>Fig. 6</span>) at one or more loci in a set of more than five microsatellite markers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100935,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair","volume":"461 4","pages":"Pages 249-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00061-6","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The instability within: problems in current analyses of microsatellite instability\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiko Maehara , Shinya Oda , Keizo Sugimachi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00061-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Microsatellite<span><span> instability is regarded as one of the phenotypes of defective DNA mismatch repair and, consequently, as a marker of high risk for cancer. Despite numerous studies, the reported rates for positive microsatellite instability differ widely in each human malignancy. These discrepancies may relate to problems in the methods used. To establish a methodology for an accurate microsatellite instability analysis, technical requirements for a precise assay and biological conditions required for positive microsatellite instability were discussed. First, to describe microsatellite changes in detail, a </span>sensitive detection system with linear detection characteristics and </span></span>electrophoresis<span><span> with standardised migration and minimised migration errors are considered to be necessary. Therefore, systems using fluorescent labelling and laser scanning are recommended. For reproducible </span>polymerase chain reactions<span>, it is essential to control the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase activity in </span></span></span><em>Taq</em> polymerase. Second, as a biological condition for positive microsatellite instability, feasible selection and combination of microsatellite markers, mutations in specific DNA mismatch repair genes and existence of monoclonal populations enriched sufficiently in a sample are essential. Finally, one possible diagnostic criterion for positive microsatellite instability is proposed, that is the existence of one of the patterns shown in the panel (see <span>Fig. 6</span>) at one or more loci in a set of more than five microsatellite markers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair\",\"volume\":\"461 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 249-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00061-6\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921877700000616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921877700000616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The instability within: problems in current analyses of microsatellite instability
Microsatellite instability is regarded as one of the phenotypes of defective DNA mismatch repair and, consequently, as a marker of high risk for cancer. Despite numerous studies, the reported rates for positive microsatellite instability differ widely in each human malignancy. These discrepancies may relate to problems in the methods used. To establish a methodology for an accurate microsatellite instability analysis, technical requirements for a precise assay and biological conditions required for positive microsatellite instability were discussed. First, to describe microsatellite changes in detail, a sensitive detection system with linear detection characteristics and electrophoresis with standardised migration and minimised migration errors are considered to be necessary. Therefore, systems using fluorescent labelling and laser scanning are recommended. For reproducible polymerase chain reactions, it is essential to control the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase activity in Taq polymerase. Second, as a biological condition for positive microsatellite instability, feasible selection and combination of microsatellite markers, mutations in specific DNA mismatch repair genes and existence of monoclonal populations enriched sufficiently in a sample are essential. Finally, one possible diagnostic criterion for positive microsatellite instability is proposed, that is the existence of one of the patterns shown in the panel (see Fig. 6) at one or more loci in a set of more than five microsatellite markers.