氯吡格雷冠状动脉支架植入术后。

Berger
{"title":"氯吡格雷冠状动脉支架植入术后。","authors":"Berger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five randomized trials have conclusively demonstrated that aspirin and ticlopidine are more effective than aspirin and Coumadin (DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., Wilmington, DE), or aspirin alone, at preventing thrombosis and other ischemic complications after stent placement. However, side effects from ticlopidine are common, the most serious of which are neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Another problem with ticlopidine is its slow onset of action. Recent observational data from several centers and data from a randomized trial indicate that clopidogrel, which can be administered with large loading doses that are well tolerated and speed the onset of action, is at least as effective as ticlopidine. Clopidogrel has far fewer side effects as well. Questions remain about the most appropriate loading dose of clopidogrel and duration of therapy after stent placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":80270,"journal":{"name":"Current interventional cardiology reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clopidogrel After Coronary Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Berger\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Five randomized trials have conclusively demonstrated that aspirin and ticlopidine are more effective than aspirin and Coumadin (DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., Wilmington, DE), or aspirin alone, at preventing thrombosis and other ischemic complications after stent placement. However, side effects from ticlopidine are common, the most serious of which are neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Another problem with ticlopidine is its slow onset of action. Recent observational data from several centers and data from a randomized trial indicate that clopidogrel, which can be administered with large loading doses that are well tolerated and speed the onset of action, is at least as effective as ticlopidine. Clopidogrel has far fewer side effects as well. Questions remain about the most appropriate loading dose of clopidogrel and duration of therapy after stent placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current interventional cardiology reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current interventional cardiology reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current interventional cardiology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五项随机试验最终证明阿司匹林和噻氯匹定在预防支架置放后血栓形成和其他缺血性并发症方面比阿司匹林和香豆素(杜邦默克制药公司,Wilmington, DE)或阿司匹林单独使用更有效。然而,噻氯匹定的副作用是常见的,其中最严重的是中性粒细胞减少症和血栓性血小板减少性紫癜。噻氯匹定的另一个问题是起效缓慢。最近来自几个中心的观察数据和一项随机试验的数据表明,氯吡格雷可以耐受良好并加速起效的大负荷剂量,至少与噻氯匹定一样有效。氯吡格雷的副作用也少得多。关于支架放置后氯吡格雷最合适的负荷剂量和治疗时间的问题仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clopidogrel After Coronary Stenting.

Five randomized trials have conclusively demonstrated that aspirin and ticlopidine are more effective than aspirin and Coumadin (DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., Wilmington, DE), or aspirin alone, at preventing thrombosis and other ischemic complications after stent placement. However, side effects from ticlopidine are common, the most serious of which are neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Another problem with ticlopidine is its slow onset of action. Recent observational data from several centers and data from a randomized trial indicate that clopidogrel, which can be administered with large loading doses that are well tolerated and speed the onset of action, is at least as effective as ticlopidine. Clopidogrel has far fewer side effects as well. Questions remain about the most appropriate loading dose of clopidogrel and duration of therapy after stent placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信