再狭窄和增生:动物模型。

Bayes-Genis, Kantor, Keelan, Altman, Lubbe, Kang, Schwartz
{"title":"再狭窄和增生:动物模型。","authors":"Bayes-Genis,&nbsp;Kantor,&nbsp;Keelan,&nbsp;Altman,&nbsp;Lubbe,&nbsp;Kang,&nbsp;Schwartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary restenosis after percutaneous interventions remains a major clinical problem even in the days of coronary stents. Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms and the assessment of therapies for the prevention of restenosis relies on experimental animal models. This article describes the most frequently used animal models of coronary artery restenosis and the differences among them. The variable response to injury in the different models should be considered in the interpretation of the effective therapies before they are transferred into clinical trials. The rat carotid model played an important role as a pioneer in animal models for restenosis but has failed to predict results of clinical restenosis. This lack of predictability highlights a fundamental lack of understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms that control vascular healing after injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":80270,"journal":{"name":"Current interventional cardiology reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restenosis and Hyperplasia: Animal Models.\",\"authors\":\"Bayes-Genis,&nbsp;Kantor,&nbsp;Keelan,&nbsp;Altman,&nbsp;Lubbe,&nbsp;Kang,&nbsp;Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coronary restenosis after percutaneous interventions remains a major clinical problem even in the days of coronary stents. Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms and the assessment of therapies for the prevention of restenosis relies on experimental animal models. This article describes the most frequently used animal models of coronary artery restenosis and the differences among them. The variable response to injury in the different models should be considered in the interpretation of the effective therapies before they are transferred into clinical trials. The rat carotid model played an important role as a pioneer in animal models for restenosis but has failed to predict results of clinical restenosis. This lack of predictability highlights a fundamental lack of understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms that control vascular healing after injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current interventional cardiology reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current interventional cardiology reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current interventional cardiology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在冠状动脉支架的时代,经皮介入治疗后的冠状动脉再狭窄仍然是一个主要的临床问题。了解再狭窄预防的病理生理机制和治疗评估依赖于实验动物模型。本文介绍了冠状动脉再狭窄最常用的动物模型以及它们之间的区别。在进入临床试验之前,在解释有效的治疗方法时,应考虑不同模型对损伤的不同反应。大鼠颈动脉模型作为再狭窄动物模型的先驱发挥了重要作用,但未能预测临床再狭窄的结果。这种可预测性的缺乏凸显了对损伤后控制血管愈合的基本分子机制的根本缺乏理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restenosis and Hyperplasia: Animal Models.

Coronary restenosis after percutaneous interventions remains a major clinical problem even in the days of coronary stents. Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms and the assessment of therapies for the prevention of restenosis relies on experimental animal models. This article describes the most frequently used animal models of coronary artery restenosis and the differences among them. The variable response to injury in the different models should be considered in the interpretation of the effective therapies before they are transferred into clinical trials. The rat carotid model played an important role as a pioneer in animal models for restenosis but has failed to predict results of clinical restenosis. This lack of predictability highlights a fundamental lack of understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms that control vascular healing after injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信