危重患儿抗菌药物的合理应用

J E Fischer, M Ramser, S Altermatt, D Nadal, K Waldvogel
{"title":"危重患儿抗菌药物的合理应用","authors":"J E Fischer,&nbsp;M Ramser,&nbsp;S Altermatt,&nbsp;D Nadal,&nbsp;K Waldvogel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high risks associated with untreated infection in critically ill newborns or children lower the threshold for prescription of antibiotic treatment. Inappropriate use of antibiotic therapy promotes the emergence of resistant strains. This study had three aims: to identify sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation, to develop revised guidelines and to implement changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was performed in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, neonatal and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a university teaching hospital during a 7-month period (456 admissions). Guidelines addressing one of the identified sources of inappropriate utilisation (prophylaxis following surgery) were developed according to published evidence and implemented, and the effect on prescription patterns was assessed during a second observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients received systemic antibiotics during 54.6% of all hospitalisation days. Antibiotics prescribed for suspected or proven infection were often continued 1-2 days beyond the intended duration. Prophylaxis accounted for 28% of all systemic antibiotics given, and postsurgical prophylaxis accounted for 14.6% of all exposure days. The literature search revealed little evidence to support this practice. After new guidelines were introduced with the aim of restricting surgical prophylaxis to a single dose prior to surgery, the rate of postsurgical prophylaxis dropped from 14.6 to 11.2% of all exposure days, accompanied by a significant decline in the overall exposure rate from 54.6 to 50.2% of all hospitalisation days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation were identified. These include failure to discontinue treatment and prolonged prophylaxis after surgery. Implementation of new guidelines reduced antibiotic utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21484,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rational utilization of antibiotics in critically ill children].\",\"authors\":\"J E Fischer,&nbsp;M Ramser,&nbsp;S Altermatt,&nbsp;D Nadal,&nbsp;K Waldvogel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high risks associated with untreated infection in critically ill newborns or children lower the threshold for prescription of antibiotic treatment. Inappropriate use of antibiotic therapy promotes the emergence of resistant strains. This study had three aims: to identify sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation, to develop revised guidelines and to implement changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was performed in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, neonatal and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a university teaching hospital during a 7-month period (456 admissions). Guidelines addressing one of the identified sources of inappropriate utilisation (prophylaxis following surgery) were developed according to published evidence and implemented, and the effect on prescription patterns was assessed during a second observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients received systemic antibiotics during 54.6% of all hospitalisation days. Antibiotics prescribed for suspected or proven infection were often continued 1-2 days beyond the intended duration. Prophylaxis accounted for 28% of all systemic antibiotics given, and postsurgical prophylaxis accounted for 14.6% of all exposure days. The literature search revealed little evidence to support this practice. After new guidelines were introduced with the aim of restricting surgical prophylaxis to a single dose prior to surgery, the rate of postsurgical prophylaxis dropped from 14.6 to 11.2% of all exposure days, accompanied by a significant decline in the overall exposure rate from 54.6 to 50.2% of all hospitalisation days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation were identified. These include failure to discontinue treatment and prolonged prophylaxis after surgery. Implementation of new guidelines reduced antibiotic utilisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重新生儿或儿童未经治疗感染相关的高风险降低了抗生素治疗处方的门槛。不适当使用抗生素治疗促进耐药菌株的出现。这项研究有三个目的:确定不适当抗生素使用的来源,制定修订指南并实施变更。方法:在一所大学教学医院的三级、多学科、新生儿和儿科重症监护室(PICU)进行了一项为期7个月的观察性研究(456例入院)。针对已确定的不适当使用来源之一(手术后预防)的指南根据已发表的证据制定并实施,并在第二个观察期评估了对处方模式的影响。结果:患者在54.6%的住院天数内接受全身性抗生素治疗。为疑似感染或证实感染而开的抗生素通常比预期持续时间延长1-2天。预防占所有给予全身性抗生素的28%,术后预防占所有暴露天数的14.6%。文献检索几乎没有发现支持这种做法的证据。在引入旨在将手术预防限制为术前单剂量的新指南后,手术后预防率从所有暴露日的14.6%下降到11.2%,同时总暴露率从所有住院日的54.6%显著下降到50.2%。结论:发现了抗生素使用不当的几个来源。这些包括手术后未能停止治疗和延长预防。新指南的实施减少了抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Rational utilization of antibiotics in critically ill children].

Background: The high risks associated with untreated infection in critically ill newborns or children lower the threshold for prescription of antibiotic treatment. Inappropriate use of antibiotic therapy promotes the emergence of resistant strains. This study had three aims: to identify sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation, to develop revised guidelines and to implement changes.

Methods: An observational study was performed in a tertiary, multidisciplinary, neonatal and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a university teaching hospital during a 7-month period (456 admissions). Guidelines addressing one of the identified sources of inappropriate utilisation (prophylaxis following surgery) were developed according to published evidence and implemented, and the effect on prescription patterns was assessed during a second observation period.

Results: Patients received systemic antibiotics during 54.6% of all hospitalisation days. Antibiotics prescribed for suspected or proven infection were often continued 1-2 days beyond the intended duration. Prophylaxis accounted for 28% of all systemic antibiotics given, and postsurgical prophylaxis accounted for 14.6% of all exposure days. The literature search revealed little evidence to support this practice. After new guidelines were introduced with the aim of restricting surgical prophylaxis to a single dose prior to surgery, the rate of postsurgical prophylaxis dropped from 14.6 to 11.2% of all exposure days, accompanied by a significant decline in the overall exposure rate from 54.6 to 50.2% of all hospitalisation days.

Conclusion: Several sources of inappropriate antibiotic utilisation were identified. These include failure to discontinue treatment and prolonged prophylaxis after surgery. Implementation of new guidelines reduced antibiotic utilisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信