J H Allum, R Greisiger, S Straubhaar, M G Carpenter
{"title":"耳蜗植入儿童的听觉感知和言语识别。","authors":"J H Allum, R Greisiger, S Straubhaar, M G Carpenter","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance of children who receive a cochlear implant may be dependent on both age of the child at implantation and the amount of experience with the implant. In the present study, changes in auditory perception and speech identification were investigated with experience of 71 children who had received a cochlear implant. The children were divided into three groups, those above and those below the age of 7 years at the time of implantation, and those aged 3 years or younger deafened by meningitis. The children received either the Nucleus 22, the Nucleus 24 or the Med El C40+ implant. The test material was a reduced form of the EARS evaluation protocol developed by Med El into a multi-language format. Tests were performed pre-operatively, within 2-5 days of first fitting of the speech processor, then at 1, 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter, for a total period of 24 months. The results indicated that all children showed improvement after 6-12 months. The rate of improvement differed between age groups. Children over 7 years of age had pre-operatively higher test scores than younger children, presumably because of their previous experience with hearing aids. These children showed an immediate post-operative drop in performance that recovered 1-3 months later. The children aged under 7 years started at lower performance levels but approached those of the older children after 12 months' cochlear implant use because their post-operative drop was less significant and their performance improved faster. Children who had been deafened by meningitis and implanted at the age of 3 or less made little progress over the first 6 months but approached test levels of the under-7-year-olds by 18 months or later. All three components of the evaluation protocol employed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP), the Monosyllabic-Trochee-Polysyllabic Test (MTP) and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and proved to be valuable in demonstrating improvement in performance of cochlear implant children in all age groups once the immediate post-operative drop had been overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"34 5","pages":"293-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000141","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol.\",\"authors\":\"J H Allum, R Greisiger, S Straubhaar, M G Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03005364000000141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The performance of children who receive a cochlear implant may be dependent on both age of the child at implantation and the amount of experience with the implant. In the present study, changes in auditory perception and speech identification were investigated with experience of 71 children who had received a cochlear implant. The children were divided into three groups, those above and those below the age of 7 years at the time of implantation, and those aged 3 years or younger deafened by meningitis. The children received either the Nucleus 22, the Nucleus 24 or the Med El C40+ implant. The test material was a reduced form of the EARS evaluation protocol developed by Med El into a multi-language format. Tests were performed pre-operatively, within 2-5 days of first fitting of the speech processor, then at 1, 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter, for a total period of 24 months. The results indicated that all children showed improvement after 6-12 months. The rate of improvement differed between age groups. Children over 7 years of age had pre-operatively higher test scores than younger children, presumably because of their previous experience with hearing aids. These children showed an immediate post-operative drop in performance that recovered 1-3 months later. The children aged under 7 years started at lower performance levels but approached those of the older children after 12 months' cochlear implant use because their post-operative drop was less significant and their performance improved faster. Children who had been deafened by meningitis and implanted at the age of 3 or less made little progress over the first 6 months but approached test levels of the under-7-year-olds by 18 months or later. All three components of the evaluation protocol employed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP), the Monosyllabic-Trochee-Polysyllabic Test (MTP) and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and proved to be valuable in demonstrating improvement in performance of cochlear implant children in all age groups once the immediate post-operative drop had been overcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"293-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000141\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
摘要
接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童的表现可能取决于植入时儿童的年龄和植入经验的多少。本研究以71名接受人工耳蜗的儿童为研究对象,探讨其听觉感知和言语识别的变化。这些儿童被分为三组,一组是植入时7岁以上和7岁以下的儿童,另一组是3岁及以下因脑膜炎而耳聋的儿童。儿童接受了Nucleus 22、Nucleus 24或Med El C40+植入物。测试材料是Med El开发的ear评估方案的简化形式,采用多语言格式。术前、语音处理器首次拟合后2-5天内、1、3、6个月及以后每6个月进行一次测试,共24个月。结果表明,所有儿童在6-12个月后均有改善。不同年龄组的改善速度不同。7岁以上的儿童术前的测试成绩比年幼的儿童高,可能是因为他们以前使用助听器的经历。这些儿童术后表现立即下降,1-3个月后恢复。7岁以下的儿童开始时的表现较低,但在使用人工耳蜗12个月后,他们的表现下降不那么明显,而且他们的表现提高得更快。因脑膜炎而失聪并在3岁或更小时植入的儿童在前6个月几乎没有进展,但在18个月或更晚时接近7岁以下儿童的测试水平。评估方案的所有三个组成部分均采用了听力进步量表(LiP)、单音节-步进-多音节测验(MTP)和有意义听觉整合量表(MAIS),并被证明在所有年龄组的人工耳蜗儿童在克服术后立即下降后的表现改善方面是有价值的。
Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol.
The performance of children who receive a cochlear implant may be dependent on both age of the child at implantation and the amount of experience with the implant. In the present study, changes in auditory perception and speech identification were investigated with experience of 71 children who had received a cochlear implant. The children were divided into three groups, those above and those below the age of 7 years at the time of implantation, and those aged 3 years or younger deafened by meningitis. The children received either the Nucleus 22, the Nucleus 24 or the Med El C40+ implant. The test material was a reduced form of the EARS evaluation protocol developed by Med El into a multi-language format. Tests were performed pre-operatively, within 2-5 days of first fitting of the speech processor, then at 1, 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter, for a total period of 24 months. The results indicated that all children showed improvement after 6-12 months. The rate of improvement differed between age groups. Children over 7 years of age had pre-operatively higher test scores than younger children, presumably because of their previous experience with hearing aids. These children showed an immediate post-operative drop in performance that recovered 1-3 months later. The children aged under 7 years started at lower performance levels but approached those of the older children after 12 months' cochlear implant use because their post-operative drop was less significant and their performance improved faster. Children who had been deafened by meningitis and implanted at the age of 3 or less made little progress over the first 6 months but approached test levels of the under-7-year-olds by 18 months or later. All three components of the evaluation protocol employed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP), the Monosyllabic-Trochee-Polysyllabic Test (MTP) and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and proved to be valuable in demonstrating improvement in performance of cochlear implant children in all age groups once the immediate post-operative drop had been overcome.