用折射率法和重量法比较亲水隐形眼镜的水化作用。

A L Alemany, M F Refojo
{"title":"用折射率法和重量法比较亲水隐形眼镜的水化作用。","authors":"A L Alemany,&nbsp;M F Refojo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the percent hydration by wet weight of hydrogel contact lenses given by the manufacturers with the values obtained using the refractive index and the gravimetry methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Valentine refractometer to determine the refractive index of new hydrogel contact lenses at equilibrium swelling in the original solution and container. From the refractive indexes we then obtained the percent hydration of the lenses using a previously prepared graph of refractive index vs percent hydration of saccharose in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0). We used an electronic analytical balance of 0.01 mg resolution to obtain the weights of new lenses when dry and at equilibrium swelling dry, and calculated the percent hydration of the lenses from the difference of the wet and dry weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hydration values of the contact lenses obtained from the index of refraction differed more than those obtained by gravimetry from the values given by the manufacturers. Acuvue lenses were an exception-the difference for them was negligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gravimetry is more accurate, but more cumbersome and time-consuming than the index of refraction for the determination of the hydration of the hydrogel contact lenses. However, when a fast and easy method is required to obtain the approximate hydration of hydrogel contact lenses, the use of the refractive index method can give acceptable results for most applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"26 4","pages":"200-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the hydration of hydrophilic contact lenses by refractive index and gravimetry.\",\"authors\":\"A L Alemany,&nbsp;M F Refojo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the percent hydration by wet weight of hydrogel contact lenses given by the manufacturers with the values obtained using the refractive index and the gravimetry methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Valentine refractometer to determine the refractive index of new hydrogel contact lenses at equilibrium swelling in the original solution and container. From the refractive indexes we then obtained the percent hydration of the lenses using a previously prepared graph of refractive index vs percent hydration of saccharose in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0). We used an electronic analytical balance of 0.01 mg resolution to obtain the weights of new lenses when dry and at equilibrium swelling dry, and calculated the percent hydration of the lenses from the difference of the wet and dry weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hydration values of the contact lenses obtained from the index of refraction differed more than those obtained by gravimetry from the values given by the manufacturers. Acuvue lenses were an exception-the difference for them was negligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gravimetry is more accurate, but more cumbersome and time-consuming than the index of refraction for the determination of the hydration of the hydrogel contact lenses. However, when a fast and easy method is required to obtain the approximate hydration of hydrogel contact lenses, the use of the refractive index method can give acceptable results for most applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"200-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较生产厂家给出的水凝胶隐形眼镜湿重水化百分数与折射率法和重量法测定的水化百分数。方法:用Valentine折射仪测定新型水凝胶隐形眼镜在原溶液和容器中平衡膨胀时的折射率。根据折射率,我们利用先前制备的折射率与磷酸盐缓冲溶液(pH 7.0)中蔗糖的水化百分比的图表,获得了透镜的水化百分比。我们使用分辨率为0.01 mg的电子分析天平获得了新晶状体在干燥和平衡膨胀干燥状态下的重量,并通过湿重和干重之差计算出晶状体的水化百分比。结果:用折射率法测得的隐形眼镜水合值与用重量法测得的厂家给出的水合值相差较大。Acuvue镜片是个例外——它们的差别可以忽略不计。结论:重量法测定水凝胶隐形眼镜的水化效果比折光法准确,但操作繁琐、耗时长。然而,当需要一种快速简便的方法来获得水凝胶隐形眼镜的近似水合作用时,折射率法在大多数应用中可以给出可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of the hydration of hydrophilic contact lenses by refractive index and gravimetry.

Purpose: To compare the percent hydration by wet weight of hydrogel contact lenses given by the manufacturers with the values obtained using the refractive index and the gravimetry methods.

Methods: We used a Valentine refractometer to determine the refractive index of new hydrogel contact lenses at equilibrium swelling in the original solution and container. From the refractive indexes we then obtained the percent hydration of the lenses using a previously prepared graph of refractive index vs percent hydration of saccharose in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0). We used an electronic analytical balance of 0.01 mg resolution to obtain the weights of new lenses when dry and at equilibrium swelling dry, and calculated the percent hydration of the lenses from the difference of the wet and dry weights.

Results: The hydration values of the contact lenses obtained from the index of refraction differed more than those obtained by gravimetry from the values given by the manufacturers. Acuvue lenses were an exception-the difference for them was negligible.

Conclusion: Gravimetry is more accurate, but more cumbersome and time-consuming than the index of refraction for the determination of the hydration of the hydrogel contact lenses. However, when a fast and easy method is required to obtain the approximate hydration of hydrogel contact lenses, the use of the refractive index method can give acceptable results for most applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信