T Li, Z H Zhu, X Liu, X Hu, J Zhao, P C Sham, D A Collier
{"title":"中国人DRD4基因多态性与海洛因滥用的相关性分析。","authors":"T Li, Z H Zhu, X Liu, X Hu, J Zhao, P C Sham, D A Collier","doi":"10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heroin abuse is a major social and public health problem in many parts of the world, yet relatively little is known about its etiology. Although genes play a role in determining susceptibility, they are expected to be of small effect with considerable heterogeneity. Because the dopamine system is involved in reward, its neurotransmitter receptors are candidates for etiological involvement in addiction. In the present study, we examine two polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor, a VNTR in exon III and a point mutation in the promoter (-512C/T) that affects transcriptional efficiency. We examined a sample of 405 heroin-abusing subjects and 304 controls from Sichuan Province, Southwest China. One hundred twenty-one of these cases and 154 controls were previously used in a study of the DRD4 VNTR [Li et al., 1997], and the remainder are newly ascertained. The two polymorphisms were in weak but detectable linkage disequilibrium (1, 418 chromosomes, P < 0.00001, D' = 0.17). When we compared the heroin-abuse group with controls, we found no significant difference between the patients and controls for either polymorphism in the DRD4 gene or their haplotypes. We were also unable to replicate our earlier association between \"long\" DRD4 alleles and heroin abuse. However, division of the sample by route of administration (nasal inhalers or injectors) produced a significant difference between inhalers and controls for the DRD4 VNTR (six-fold corrected P = 0. 018 by allele) but not for injectors of heroin. The association we observed between inhalers and the DRD4 polymorphism is difficult to interpret, although it is possible that the association is explained by different levels of novelty seeking between the two subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7708,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":"96 5","pages":"616-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association analysis of polymorphisms in the DRD4 gene and heroin abuse in Chinese subjects.\",\"authors\":\"T Li, Z H Zhu, X Liu, X Hu, J Zhao, P C Sham, D A Collier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heroin abuse is a major social and public health problem in many parts of the world, yet relatively little is known about its etiology. Although genes play a role in determining susceptibility, they are expected to be of small effect with considerable heterogeneity. Because the dopamine system is involved in reward, its neurotransmitter receptors are candidates for etiological involvement in addiction. In the present study, we examine two polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor, a VNTR in exon III and a point mutation in the promoter (-512C/T) that affects transcriptional efficiency. We examined a sample of 405 heroin-abusing subjects and 304 controls from Sichuan Province, Southwest China. One hundred twenty-one of these cases and 154 controls were previously used in a study of the DRD4 VNTR [Li et al., 1997], and the remainder are newly ascertained. The two polymorphisms were in weak but detectable linkage disequilibrium (1, 418 chromosomes, P < 0.00001, D' = 0.17). When we compared the heroin-abuse group with controls, we found no significant difference between the patients and controls for either polymorphism in the DRD4 gene or their haplotypes. We were also unable to replicate our earlier association between \\\"long\\\" DRD4 alleles and heroin abuse. However, division of the sample by route of administration (nasal inhalers or injectors) produced a significant difference between inhalers and controls for the DRD4 VNTR (six-fold corrected P = 0. 018 by allele) but not for injectors of heroin. The association we observed between inhalers and the DRD4 polymorphism is difficult to interpret, although it is possible that the association is explained by different levels of novelty seeking between the two subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":\"96 5\",\"pages\":\"616-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<616::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
摘要
海洛因滥用在世界许多地方是一个重大的社会和公共卫生问题,但对其病因了解相对较少。虽然基因在决定易感性中起作用,但它们的影响较小,异质性较大。因为多巴胺系统参与奖励,它的神经递质受体是成瘾的病因学参与的候选人。在本研究中,我们研究了多巴胺D4受体的两个多态性,外显子III的VNTR和启动子(-512C/T)的点突变,它们影响转录效率。我们对来自中国西南部四川省的405名海洛因滥用者和304名对照者进行了调查。其中121例病例和154例对照曾用于DRD4 VNTR的研究[Li等,1997],其余病例为新确定的。两种多态性均存在较弱但可检测到的连锁不平衡(1,418条染色体,P < 0.00001, D' = 0.17)。当我们将海洛因滥用组与对照组进行比较时,我们发现患者和对照组在DRD4基因多态性或单倍型方面没有显著差异。我们也无法复制之前在“长”DRD4等位基因和海洛因滥用之间的联系。然而,按给药途径(鼻吸入器或注射器)划分样本,在DRD4 VNTR的吸入器和对照组之间产生了显著差异(六倍校正P = 0)。018等位基因),但对海洛因注射者没有影响。我们观察到的吸入器与DRD4多态性之间的关联很难解释,尽管这种关联可能是由两个亚组之间不同程度的新奇追求来解释的。
Association analysis of polymorphisms in the DRD4 gene and heroin abuse in Chinese subjects.
Heroin abuse is a major social and public health problem in many parts of the world, yet relatively little is known about its etiology. Although genes play a role in determining susceptibility, they are expected to be of small effect with considerable heterogeneity. Because the dopamine system is involved in reward, its neurotransmitter receptors are candidates for etiological involvement in addiction. In the present study, we examine two polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor, a VNTR in exon III and a point mutation in the promoter (-512C/T) that affects transcriptional efficiency. We examined a sample of 405 heroin-abusing subjects and 304 controls from Sichuan Province, Southwest China. One hundred twenty-one of these cases and 154 controls were previously used in a study of the DRD4 VNTR [Li et al., 1997], and the remainder are newly ascertained. The two polymorphisms were in weak but detectable linkage disequilibrium (1, 418 chromosomes, P < 0.00001, D' = 0.17). When we compared the heroin-abuse group with controls, we found no significant difference between the patients and controls for either polymorphism in the DRD4 gene or their haplotypes. We were also unable to replicate our earlier association between "long" DRD4 alleles and heroin abuse. However, division of the sample by route of administration (nasal inhalers or injectors) produced a significant difference between inhalers and controls for the DRD4 VNTR (six-fold corrected P = 0. 018 by allele) but not for injectors of heroin. The association we observed between inhalers and the DRD4 polymorphism is difficult to interpret, although it is possible that the association is explained by different levels of novelty seeking between the two subgroups.