{"title":"奶瓶喂养婴儿的孔流率与十字流率的比较。","authors":"E Walden, J Prendergast","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Under laboratory conditions the flow rates of two types of teat were compared. The openings of Group A teats were in the form of a cross-cut measuring 1.5 mm in radius plus a small central hole. Group B teats were pierced with a single hole of 0.5 mm in diameter. Five teats from each group were tested under atmospheric pressure conditions simulating the effect of a baby's sucking. The results of this trial confirms the hypothesis that the style of teat affects the flow rate and that faster flow rates can be obtained with a cross-cut teat rather than a single-hole teat. Babies using cross-cut teats may also learn to control flow rates by changing their sucking style.</p>","PeriodicalId":79435,"journal":{"name":"Professional care of mother and child","volume":"10 1","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of flow rates of holes versus cross-cut teats for bottle-fed babies.\",\"authors\":\"E Walden, J Prendergast\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Under laboratory conditions the flow rates of two types of teat were compared. The openings of Group A teats were in the form of a cross-cut measuring 1.5 mm in radius plus a small central hole. Group B teats were pierced with a single hole of 0.5 mm in diameter. Five teats from each group were tested under atmospheric pressure conditions simulating the effect of a baby's sucking. The results of this trial confirms the hypothesis that the style of teat affects the flow rate and that faster flow rates can be obtained with a cross-cut teat rather than a single-hole teat. Babies using cross-cut teats may also learn to control flow rates by changing their sucking style.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional care of mother and child\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"7-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional care of mother and child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional care of mother and child","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of flow rates of holes versus cross-cut teats for bottle-fed babies.
Under laboratory conditions the flow rates of two types of teat were compared. The openings of Group A teats were in the form of a cross-cut measuring 1.5 mm in radius plus a small central hole. Group B teats were pierced with a single hole of 0.5 mm in diameter. Five teats from each group were tested under atmospheric pressure conditions simulating the effect of a baby's sucking. The results of this trial confirms the hypothesis that the style of teat affects the flow rate and that faster flow rates can be obtained with a cross-cut teat rather than a single-hole teat. Babies using cross-cut teats may also learn to control flow rates by changing their sucking style.