小关节疼痛和神经阻滞在治疗中的作用。

Manchikanti
{"title":"小关节疼痛和神经阻滞在治疗中的作用。","authors":"Manchikanti","doi":"10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic spinal pain is a common medical problem with serious financial and social consequences. Among the various structures with potential for producing pain in the spine, facet joints as sources of chronic spinal pain have attracted considerable attention and controversy. Significant progress has been made in precision diagnosis of spinal pain with neural blockade, in the face of less than optimal diagnostic information offered by imaging and neurophysiologic studies. Research into the role of facet joints in spinal pain has shown that cervical facet joints are the cause of chronic neck pain in 54% to 60% of patients, whereas lumbar facet joints cause pain in 15% to 40% of patients with chronic low back pain. Local anesthetic blocks of medial branches have proven to be a reliable diagnostic test; they are target-specific when used appropriately with control blocks, either with two local anesthetics with different durations of action or with the addition of an inactive placebo injection. The literature is replete with reports on uncontrolled studies, case reports, and documentation from a few controlled studies, all of which offer supporting information on the rationale and effectiveness of facet blocks and neurotomy. Facet joint injections and medial branch blocks are considered to be of equal value. Lumbar intra-articular steroid injections have been proven effective to a certain extent, but evidence indicates that cervical intra-articular steroids are ineffective. The role of repeat medial branch blocks is not known. Radiofrequency neurotomy remains the only practical and validated treatment for cervical facet joint pain; however, its role in management of either lumbar or thoracic facet joint pain awaits validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":80271,"journal":{"name":"Current review of pain","volume":"3 5","pages":"348-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facet Joint Pain and the Role of Neural Blockade in Its Management.\",\"authors\":\"Manchikanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic spinal pain is a common medical problem with serious financial and social consequences. Among the various structures with potential for producing pain in the spine, facet joints as sources of chronic spinal pain have attracted considerable attention and controversy. Significant progress has been made in precision diagnosis of spinal pain with neural blockade, in the face of less than optimal diagnostic information offered by imaging and neurophysiologic studies. Research into the role of facet joints in spinal pain has shown that cervical facet joints are the cause of chronic neck pain in 54% to 60% of patients, whereas lumbar facet joints cause pain in 15% to 40% of patients with chronic low back pain. Local anesthetic blocks of medial branches have proven to be a reliable diagnostic test; they are target-specific when used appropriately with control blocks, either with two local anesthetics with different durations of action or with the addition of an inactive placebo injection. The literature is replete with reports on uncontrolled studies, case reports, and documentation from a few controlled studies, all of which offer supporting information on the rationale and effectiveness of facet blocks and neurotomy. Facet joint injections and medial branch blocks are considered to be of equal value. Lumbar intra-articular steroid injections have been proven effective to a certain extent, but evidence indicates that cervical intra-articular steroids are ineffective. The role of repeat medial branch blocks is not known. Radiofrequency neurotomy remains the only practical and validated treatment for cervical facet joint pain; however, its role in management of either lumbar or thoracic facet joint pain awaits validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current review of pain\",\"volume\":\"3 5\",\"pages\":\"348-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current review of pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current review of pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-999-0030-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

慢性脊柱疼痛是一种常见的医学问题,具有严重的经济和社会后果。在可能产生脊柱疼痛的各种结构中,小关节作为慢性脊柱疼痛的来源引起了相当大的关注和争议。面对成像和神经生理学研究提供的不太理想的诊断信息,在神经阻断脊柱疼痛的精确诊断方面取得了重大进展。关于小关节在脊柱疼痛中的作用的研究表明,在54%至60%的患者中,颈小关节是慢性颈部疼痛的原因,而在15%至40%的慢性腰痛患者中,腰小关节是引起疼痛的原因。局部麻醉阻滞内侧分支已被证明是一种可靠的诊断试验;当适当地与对照块一起使用时,它们是针对特定目标的,或者与两种作用时间不同的局部麻醉剂一起使用,或者与非活性安慰剂注射一起使用。文献中充满了非对照研究的报告、病例报告和一些对照研究的文献,所有这些都提供了关于小面阻滞和神经切开术的基本原理和有效性的支持信息。小关节注射和内侧分支阻滞被认为是相同的价值。腰椎关节内类固醇注射已被证明在一定程度上有效,但有证据表明颈椎关节内类固醇是无效的。重复内侧分支阻滞的作用尚不清楚。射频神经切开术仍然是唯一实用和有效的治疗颈椎小关节疼痛;然而,它在腰椎或胸椎小关节疼痛治疗中的作用有待验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facet Joint Pain and the Role of Neural Blockade in Its Management.

Chronic spinal pain is a common medical problem with serious financial and social consequences. Among the various structures with potential for producing pain in the spine, facet joints as sources of chronic spinal pain have attracted considerable attention and controversy. Significant progress has been made in precision diagnosis of spinal pain with neural blockade, in the face of less than optimal diagnostic information offered by imaging and neurophysiologic studies. Research into the role of facet joints in spinal pain has shown that cervical facet joints are the cause of chronic neck pain in 54% to 60% of patients, whereas lumbar facet joints cause pain in 15% to 40% of patients with chronic low back pain. Local anesthetic blocks of medial branches have proven to be a reliable diagnostic test; they are target-specific when used appropriately with control blocks, either with two local anesthetics with different durations of action or with the addition of an inactive placebo injection. The literature is replete with reports on uncontrolled studies, case reports, and documentation from a few controlled studies, all of which offer supporting information on the rationale and effectiveness of facet blocks and neurotomy. Facet joint injections and medial branch blocks are considered to be of equal value. Lumbar intra-articular steroid injections have been proven effective to a certain extent, but evidence indicates that cervical intra-articular steroids are ineffective. The role of repeat medial branch blocks is not known. Radiofrequency neurotomy remains the only practical and validated treatment for cervical facet joint pain; however, its role in management of either lumbar or thoracic facet joint pain awaits validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信