氧氟沙星和米诺环素治疗对多菌性麻风患者PCR阳性的影响。

Acta leprologica Pub Date : 1999-01-01
H B Singh, K Katoch, M Natrajan, R K Sharma, U D Gupta, V D Sharma, D Singh, D S Chauhan, K Srivastava, V M Katoch
{"title":"氧氟沙星和米诺环素治疗对多菌性麻风患者PCR阳性的影响。","authors":"H B Singh,&nbsp;K Katoch,&nbsp;M Natrajan,&nbsp;R K Sharma,&nbsp;U D Gupta,&nbsp;V D Sharma,&nbsp;D Singh,&nbsp;D S Chauhan,&nbsp;K Srivastava,&nbsp;V M Katoch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to develop objective criteria to monitor trends of therapeutic responses positivity of PCR signals and ATP assay methods has been compared in multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients. Biopsies from lesions of 95 BL/LL patients before and after one year of treatment with a new drug regimen comprising of conventional and newer drugs ofloxacin and minocycline have been studied. These biopsies were processed for bacillary ATP assay and PCR positivity for a 36 kDa gene target by earlier published methods. In the untreated patients bacillary ATP levels were detectable in all specimens and ranged from 0.02 to more than 36 pg/millions organisms. After one year of treatment ATP levels were not detectable in any of the 57 biopsies specimens available for analysis. However, PCR signals were detectable in 3 out of 57 biopsies. In two specimens signals were very weak detectable only by hybridization. It may be concluded that DNA based PCR assay may be useful in monitoring the trends of therapeutic responses in MB patients under treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6905,"journal":{"name":"Acta leprologica","volume":"11 4","pages":"179-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of treatment on PCR positivity in multibacillary leprosy patients treated with conventional and newer drugs ofloxacin and minocycline.\",\"authors\":\"H B Singh,&nbsp;K Katoch,&nbsp;M Natrajan,&nbsp;R K Sharma,&nbsp;U D Gupta,&nbsp;V D Sharma,&nbsp;D Singh,&nbsp;D S Chauhan,&nbsp;K Srivastava,&nbsp;V M Katoch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to develop objective criteria to monitor trends of therapeutic responses positivity of PCR signals and ATP assay methods has been compared in multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients. Biopsies from lesions of 95 BL/LL patients before and after one year of treatment with a new drug regimen comprising of conventional and newer drugs ofloxacin and minocycline have been studied. These biopsies were processed for bacillary ATP assay and PCR positivity for a 36 kDa gene target by earlier published methods. In the untreated patients bacillary ATP levels were detectable in all specimens and ranged from 0.02 to more than 36 pg/millions organisms. After one year of treatment ATP levels were not detectable in any of the 57 biopsies specimens available for analysis. However, PCR signals were detectable in 3 out of 57 biopsies. In two specimens signals were very weak detectable only by hybridization. It may be concluded that DNA based PCR assay may be useful in monitoring the trends of therapeutic responses in MB patients under treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta leprologica\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"179-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta leprologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta leprologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了建立监测治疗反应趋势的客观标准,比较了PCR阳性信号和ATP检测方法在多杆菌(MB)麻风患者中的应用。研究了95例BL/LL患者在接受由传统药物和较新的药物氧氟沙星和米诺环素组成的新药物方案治疗前后一年的病变活检。通过早期发表的方法,对这些活检组织进行细菌ATP测定和PCR检测36 kDa基因目标的阳性。在未经治疗的患者中,所有标本中都检测到细菌ATP水平,范围从0.02到超过36 pg/百万生物体。治疗一年后,57例可用于分析的活检标本中均未检测到ATP水平。然而,57例活检中有3例检测到PCR信号。在两个标本中,只有通过杂交才能检测到信号非常微弱。因此,基于DNA的PCR检测可能有助于监测MB患者治疗反应的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of treatment on PCR positivity in multibacillary leprosy patients treated with conventional and newer drugs ofloxacin and minocycline.

In order to develop objective criteria to monitor trends of therapeutic responses positivity of PCR signals and ATP assay methods has been compared in multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients. Biopsies from lesions of 95 BL/LL patients before and after one year of treatment with a new drug regimen comprising of conventional and newer drugs ofloxacin and minocycline have been studied. These biopsies were processed for bacillary ATP assay and PCR positivity for a 36 kDa gene target by earlier published methods. In the untreated patients bacillary ATP levels were detectable in all specimens and ranged from 0.02 to more than 36 pg/millions organisms. After one year of treatment ATP levels were not detectable in any of the 57 biopsies specimens available for analysis. However, PCR signals were detectable in 3 out of 57 biopsies. In two specimens signals were very weak detectable only by hybridization. It may be concluded that DNA based PCR assay may be useful in monitoring the trends of therapeutic responses in MB patients under treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信