全体FDG PET在黑色素瘤患者治疗中的文献综述。

J Schwimmer, R Essner, A Patel, S A Jahan, J E Shepherd, K Park, M E Phelps, J Czernin, S S Gambhir
{"title":"全体FDG PET在黑色素瘤患者治疗中的文献综述。","authors":"J Schwimmer,&nbsp;R Essner,&nbsp;A Patel,&nbsp;S A Jahan,&nbsp;J E Shepherd,&nbsp;K Park,&nbsp;M E Phelps,&nbsp;J Czernin,&nbsp;S S Gambhir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A review and meta-analysis of the literature on the use of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of recurrent melanoma was conducted. The goals were to evaluate the quality of data reporting and to determine the overall values for the sensitivity and specificity of whole body FDG PET and management changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guidelines to evaluate reporting within articles were formulated based on the United States medical payer source criteria for assessing studies reporting information on the utilization of new medical technology. A meta-analysis was conducted using methodology described in the peer reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our MEDLINE PLUS search resulted in a universe of 89 total articles. Within these 89, 19 were categorized in our targeted content area of which 13 were selected for analysis in our targeted subset, with the remaining 70 covering 24 different related content areas. Five of 13 (38%) articles in the target subset reported data which was adequate for incorporation into modeling objectives based on PET sensitivity and specificity values, with 1 of 13 (8%) in the same target subset reporting data adequate for modeling based on change-in-management data. Through a meta-analysis of the 13 target articles we determined, within a 95% confidence level, an overall sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence level 88.41%-95.82%) and an overall specificity of 90% (95% confidence level 83.26%-96.05%) as calculated by number of lesions, for FDG PET detecting recurrent melanoma throughout the whole body. Furthermore, limited data available for change-in-management suggests an overall FDG PET directed change-in-management value of 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review suggests that improvements can be made to more effectively report the results of these FDG PET studies. The overall values determined through the meta-analysis indicate the potential benefits of using FDG PET as a diagnostic/management tool. Furthermore, these values should prove useful to assessing the cost effectiveness of utilizing FDG PET in the management of recurrent melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":79384,"journal":{"name":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)","volume":"44 2","pages":"153-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of the literature for whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"J Schwimmer,&nbsp;R Essner,&nbsp;A Patel,&nbsp;S A Jahan,&nbsp;J E Shepherd,&nbsp;K Park,&nbsp;M E Phelps,&nbsp;J Czernin,&nbsp;S S Gambhir\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A review and meta-analysis of the literature on the use of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of recurrent melanoma was conducted. The goals were to evaluate the quality of data reporting and to determine the overall values for the sensitivity and specificity of whole body FDG PET and management changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guidelines to evaluate reporting within articles were formulated based on the United States medical payer source criteria for assessing studies reporting information on the utilization of new medical technology. A meta-analysis was conducted using methodology described in the peer reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our MEDLINE PLUS search resulted in a universe of 89 total articles. Within these 89, 19 were categorized in our targeted content area of which 13 were selected for analysis in our targeted subset, with the remaining 70 covering 24 different related content areas. Five of 13 (38%) articles in the target subset reported data which was adequate for incorporation into modeling objectives based on PET sensitivity and specificity values, with 1 of 13 (8%) in the same target subset reporting data adequate for modeling based on change-in-management data. Through a meta-analysis of the 13 target articles we determined, within a 95% confidence level, an overall sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence level 88.41%-95.82%) and an overall specificity of 90% (95% confidence level 83.26%-96.05%) as calculated by number of lesions, for FDG PET detecting recurrent melanoma throughout the whole body. Furthermore, limited data available for change-in-management suggests an overall FDG PET directed change-in-management value of 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review suggests that improvements can be made to more effectively report the results of these FDG PET studies. The overall values determined through the meta-analysis indicate the potential benefits of using FDG PET as a diagnostic/management tool. Furthermore, these values should prove useful to assessing the cost effectiveness of utilizing FDG PET in the management of recurrent melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"153-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对2-[18F]氟-2-脱氧-d -葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检测复发性黑色素瘤的文献进行综述和荟萃分析。目的是评估数据报告的质量,并确定全身FDG PET的敏感性和特异性以及管理变化的总体价值。方法:根据美国医疗支付者来源标准,评估关于新医疗技术使用的研究报告信息,制定了评估文章报告的指南。采用同行评议文献中描述的方法进行荟萃分析。结果:我们的MEDLINE PLUS搜索结果是总共89篇文章。在这89个目录中,有19个目录属于我们的目标内容领域,其中13个被选中用于我们的目标子集的分析,其余70个目录涵盖24个不同的相关内容领域。目标子集中的13篇文章中有5篇(38%)报告的数据足以纳入基于PET敏感性和特异性值的建模目标,同一目标子集中的13篇文章中有1篇(8%)报告的数据足以基于管理变更数据进行建模。通过对13篇目标文章的荟萃分析,我们确定,在95%的置信水平内,FDG PET检测全身复发性黑色素瘤的总灵敏度为92%(95%置信水平为88.41%-95.82%),总特异性为90%(95%置信水平为83.26%-96.05%)。此外,有限的管理变更数据表明,FDG PET导向的总体管理变更价值为22%。结论:我们的综述表明,为了更有效地报道这些FDG PET研究的结果,可以进行改进。通过荟萃分析确定的总体价值表明使用FDG PET作为诊断/管理工具的潜在益处。此外,这些值对于评估使用FDG PET治疗复发性黑色素瘤的成本效益是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of the literature for whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with melanoma.

Background: A review and meta-analysis of the literature on the use of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of recurrent melanoma was conducted. The goals were to evaluate the quality of data reporting and to determine the overall values for the sensitivity and specificity of whole body FDG PET and management changes.

Methods: Guidelines to evaluate reporting within articles were formulated based on the United States medical payer source criteria for assessing studies reporting information on the utilization of new medical technology. A meta-analysis was conducted using methodology described in the peer reviewed literature.

Results: Our MEDLINE PLUS search resulted in a universe of 89 total articles. Within these 89, 19 were categorized in our targeted content area of which 13 were selected for analysis in our targeted subset, with the remaining 70 covering 24 different related content areas. Five of 13 (38%) articles in the target subset reported data which was adequate for incorporation into modeling objectives based on PET sensitivity and specificity values, with 1 of 13 (8%) in the same target subset reporting data adequate for modeling based on change-in-management data. Through a meta-analysis of the 13 target articles we determined, within a 95% confidence level, an overall sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence level 88.41%-95.82%) and an overall specificity of 90% (95% confidence level 83.26%-96.05%) as calculated by number of lesions, for FDG PET detecting recurrent melanoma throughout the whole body. Furthermore, limited data available for change-in-management suggests an overall FDG PET directed change-in-management value of 22%.

Conclusions: Our review suggests that improvements can be made to more effectively report the results of these FDG PET studies. The overall values determined through the meta-analysis indicate the potential benefits of using FDG PET as a diagnostic/management tool. Furthermore, these values should prove useful to assessing the cost effectiveness of utilizing FDG PET in the management of recurrent melanoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信