S Jelić, N Babović, M Kreacić, S Matković, N Milanović, D Gavrilović, Z Tomasević
{"title":"表柔比星150mg /m2-顺铂与表柔比星180mg /m2-顺铂治疗晚期软组织肉瘤。","authors":"S Jelić, N Babović, M Kreacić, S Matković, N Milanović, D Gavrilović, Z Tomasević","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have previously reported the superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin combination over single drug epirubicin 180 mg/m2 for advanced soft tissue sarcoma both in terms of response (54% vs. 29%, p = 0.025) and survival (p = 0.001). The aim of the present study was to establish whether decreasing the dosage of epirubicin to 150 mg/m2 would result in the same activity but with less hematological toxicity. One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma were randomized for either epirubicin 150 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group A) or epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group B). The results were as follows: group A: 79 patients were evaluated. Overall response rate was 24/79 (30%) (95% CI 21-41%). Median survival was 11 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.46. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 111/274 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 22/274. Group B: 73 patients were evaluated. The overall response rate was 39/73 (53%), (95% CI 42-64%). Median survival was 14 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.58. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 136/295 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 30/295. The differences were as follows: for overall response rate p = 0.004; power (for p = 0.05) 85%; for survival p = 0.09; for grade IV granulocytopenia p = 0.3; and for febrile neutropenia p = 0.61. A survival advantage (p = 0.043) was evident for patients randomized to group B and with performance status 0 or 1 compared with similar patients from group A. A plateau-like formation on the probability level of 0.26 on the survival curve started from month 26 onwards. In conclusion, both regimens share the same toxicity but epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin seems more active in soft tissue sarcoma, possibly indicating a breakthrough for activity between an epirubicin dosage of 150 mg/m2 and 180 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. The superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin regimen appears evident both in terms of response and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"19 4","pages":"129-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epirubicin 150 mg/m2-cisplatin versus epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.\",\"authors\":\"S Jelić, N Babović, M Kreacić, S Matković, N Milanović, D Gavrilović, Z Tomasević\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have previously reported the superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin combination over single drug epirubicin 180 mg/m2 for advanced soft tissue sarcoma both in terms of response (54% vs. 29%, p = 0.025) and survival (p = 0.001). The aim of the present study was to establish whether decreasing the dosage of epirubicin to 150 mg/m2 would result in the same activity but with less hematological toxicity. One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma were randomized for either epirubicin 150 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group A) or epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group B). The results were as follows: group A: 79 patients were evaluated. Overall response rate was 24/79 (30%) (95% CI 21-41%). Median survival was 11 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.46. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 111/274 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 22/274. Group B: 73 patients were evaluated. The overall response rate was 39/73 (53%), (95% CI 42-64%). Median survival was 14 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.58. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 136/295 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 30/295. The differences were as follows: for overall response rate p = 0.004; power (for p = 0.05) 85%; for survival p = 0.09; for grade IV granulocytopenia p = 0.3; and for febrile neutropenia p = 0.61. A survival advantage (p = 0.043) was evident for patients randomized to group B and with performance status 0 or 1 compared with similar patients from group A. A plateau-like formation on the probability level of 0.26 on the survival curve started from month 26 onwards. In conclusion, both regimens share the same toxicity but epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin seems more active in soft tissue sarcoma, possibly indicating a breakthrough for activity between an epirubicin dosage of 150 mg/m2 and 180 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. The superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin regimen appears evident both in terms of response and survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"129-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们之前报道过表柔比星180mg /m2-顺铂联合治疗晚期软组织肉瘤优于单药表柔比星180mg /m2的疗效(54% vs 29%, p = 0.025)和生存率(p = 0.001)。本研究的目的是确定表柔比星的剂量减少到150mg /m2是否会产生相同的活性,但血液毒性更小。将159例晚期软组织肉瘤患者随机分为表柔比星150mg /m2-顺铂120mg /m2 (A组)和表柔比星180mg /m2-顺铂120mg /m2 (B组)两组,结果如下:A组:评估79例患者。总有效率为24/79 (30%)(95% CI 21-41%)。中位生存期为11个月,1年生存率为0.46。IV级粒细胞减少出现在111/274周期,发热性中性粒细胞减少出现在22/274周期。B组:评估73例患者。总有效率为39/73 (53%),(95% CI 42-64%)。中位生存期为14个月,1年生存率为0.58。136/295周期出现IV级粒细胞减少症,30/295周期出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症。差异如下:总有效率p = 0.004;功率(p = 0.05) 85%;生存率p = 0.09;IV级粒细胞减少p = 0.3;对于发热性中性粒细胞减少p = 0.61。随机分配到B组且表现状态为0或1的患者与A组类似患者相比,生存优势明显(p = 0.043)。从26个月开始,生存曲线上出现0.26的平台样形成的概率水平。综上所述,这两种方案具有相同的毒性,但表柔比星180mg /m2-顺铂似乎在软组织肉瘤中更有活性,可能表明表柔比星150mg /m2和180mg /m2联合顺铂之间的活性有了突破。表柔比星180mg /m2顺铂方案的优势在反应和生存方面都很明显。
Epirubicin 150 mg/m2-cisplatin versus epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
We have previously reported the superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin combination over single drug epirubicin 180 mg/m2 for advanced soft tissue sarcoma both in terms of response (54% vs. 29%, p = 0.025) and survival (p = 0.001). The aim of the present study was to establish whether decreasing the dosage of epirubicin to 150 mg/m2 would result in the same activity but with less hematological toxicity. One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma were randomized for either epirubicin 150 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group A) or epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin 120 mg/m2 (group B). The results were as follows: group A: 79 patients were evaluated. Overall response rate was 24/79 (30%) (95% CI 21-41%). Median survival was 11 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.46. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 111/274 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 22/274. Group B: 73 patients were evaluated. The overall response rate was 39/73 (53%), (95% CI 42-64%). Median survival was 14 months and probability of survival at 1 year was 0.58. Grade IV granulocytopenia was present in 136/295 cycles and febrile neutropenia in 30/295. The differences were as follows: for overall response rate p = 0.004; power (for p = 0.05) 85%; for survival p = 0.09; for grade IV granulocytopenia p = 0.3; and for febrile neutropenia p = 0.61. A survival advantage (p = 0.043) was evident for patients randomized to group B and with performance status 0 or 1 compared with similar patients from group A. A plateau-like formation on the probability level of 0.26 on the survival curve started from month 26 onwards. In conclusion, both regimens share the same toxicity but epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin seems more active in soft tissue sarcoma, possibly indicating a breakthrough for activity between an epirubicin dosage of 150 mg/m2 and 180 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. The superiority of the epirubicin 180 mg/m2-cisplatin regimen appears evident both in terms of response and survival.