急诊科高级住院医师沟通技巧培训——一项定性研究。

G Lloyd, D Skarratts, N Robinson, C Reid
{"title":"急诊科高级住院医师沟通技巧培训——一项定性研究。","authors":"G Lloyd,&nbsp;D Skarratts,&nbsp;N Robinson,&nbsp;C Reid","doi":"10.1136/emj.17.4.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify common weaknesses in senior house officer-patient consultation skills, and evaluate direct observation with feedback and negotiation of educational contracts, as a teaching tool in an emergency department setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Common weaknesses were identified through review of feedback charts by three trained observers. Alteration in clinical and learning behaviour, as well as senior house officer and observer perceptions of the teaching were evaluated qualitatively by a combination of semistructured interviews and focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several common weaknesses were identified, notably the use of closed questions, and poor negotiation and explanation of treatment plan and follow up. The senior house officers perceived improvement in their clinical practice, welcomed feedback, and subsequently set, though did not complete educational contracts. While comfortable with this style of teaching, the observers felt that it did not make efficient use of teaching time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies common weaknesses in the consultation skills of emergency department senior house officers and confirms the need for training in this area. Direct observation is effective in changing behaviour to this end, though self directed learning is not necessarily stimulated. Video recorded consultations with group feedback may be a more effective teaching tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":73580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.4.246","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication skills training for emergency department senior house officers--a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"G Lloyd,&nbsp;D Skarratts,&nbsp;N Robinson,&nbsp;C Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emj.17.4.246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify common weaknesses in senior house officer-patient consultation skills, and evaluate direct observation with feedback and negotiation of educational contracts, as a teaching tool in an emergency department setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Common weaknesses were identified through review of feedback charts by three trained observers. Alteration in clinical and learning behaviour, as well as senior house officer and observer perceptions of the teaching were evaluated qualitatively by a combination of semistructured interviews and focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several common weaknesses were identified, notably the use of closed questions, and poor negotiation and explanation of treatment plan and follow up. The senior house officers perceived improvement in their clinical practice, welcomed feedback, and subsequently set, though did not complete educational contracts. While comfortable with this style of teaching, the observers felt that it did not make efficient use of teaching time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identifies common weaknesses in the consultation skills of emergency department senior house officers and confirms the need for training in this area. Direct observation is effective in changing behaviour to this end, though self directed learning is not necessarily stimulated. Video recorded consultations with group feedback may be a more effective teaching tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.17.4.246\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of accident & emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.4.246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of accident & emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.17.4.246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

目的:找出高级住院医生与病人协商技巧的共同弱点,并评估直接观察与反馈和教育合同谈判,作为急诊科设置的教学工具。方法:由三名训练有素的观察员通过审查反馈图表来确定共同的弱点。临床和学习行为的改变,以及高级院务人员和观察员对教学的看法,通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组的组合进行定性评估。结果:发现了几个共同的弱点,特别是使用封闭式问题,对治疗计划和随访的谈判和解释不力。高级住院医生认为他们的临床实践有所改善,欢迎反馈,并随后签订了教育合同,尽管没有完成。虽然对这种教学方式感到满意,但观察员们觉得它没有有效利用教学时间。结论:本研究确定了急诊科高级住院医生在咨询技能方面的共同弱点,并确认了在这方面进行培训的必要性。直接观察对改变行为是有效的,虽然自我导向的学习不一定会受到刺激。录像咨询与小组反馈可能是一个更有效的教学工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication skills training for emergency department senior house officers--a qualitative study.

Objective: To identify common weaknesses in senior house officer-patient consultation skills, and evaluate direct observation with feedback and negotiation of educational contracts, as a teaching tool in an emergency department setting.

Method: Common weaknesses were identified through review of feedback charts by three trained observers. Alteration in clinical and learning behaviour, as well as senior house officer and observer perceptions of the teaching were evaluated qualitatively by a combination of semistructured interviews and focus groups.

Results: Several common weaknesses were identified, notably the use of closed questions, and poor negotiation and explanation of treatment plan and follow up. The senior house officers perceived improvement in their clinical practice, welcomed feedback, and subsequently set, though did not complete educational contracts. While comfortable with this style of teaching, the observers felt that it did not make efficient use of teaching time.

Conclusions: This study identifies common weaknesses in the consultation skills of emergency department senior house officers and confirms the need for training in this area. Direct observation is effective in changing behaviour to this end, though self directed learning is not necessarily stimulated. Video recorded consultations with group feedback may be a more effective teaching tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信