音视频数据源信息获取:远程诊断的实验研究。LOTAS集团。

Y Xiao, C MacKenzie, J Orasanu, R Spencer, A Rahman, V Gunawardane
{"title":"音视频数据源信息获取:远程诊断的实验研究。LOTAS集团。","authors":"Y Xiao,&nbsp;C MacKenzie,&nbsp;J Orasanu,&nbsp;R Spencer,&nbsp;A Rahman,&nbsp;V Gunawardane","doi":"10.1089/107830299312104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine what information sources are used during a remote diagnosis task.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Experienced trauma care providers viewed segments of videotaped initial trauma patient resuscitation and airway management. Experiment 1 collected responses from anesthesiologists to probing questions during and after the presentation of recorded video materials. Experiment 2 collected the responses from three types of care providers (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons). Written and verbal responses were scored according to detection of critical events in video materials and categorized according to their content. Experiment 3 collected visual scanning data using an eyetracker during the viewing of recorded video materials from the three types of care providers. Eye-gaze data were analyzed in terms of focus on various parts of the videotaped materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Care providers were found to be unable to detect several critical events. The three groups of subjects studied (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons) focused on different aspects of videotaped materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the remote events and activities are multidisciplinary and rapidly changing, experts linked with audio-video-data connections may encounter difficulties in comprehending remote activities, and their information usage may be biased. Special training is needed for the remote decision-maker to appreciate tasks outside his or her speciality and beyond the boundaries of traditional divisions of labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"5 2","pages":"139-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312104","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information acquisition from audio-video-data sources: an experimental study on remote diagnosis. The LOTAS Group.\",\"authors\":\"Y Xiao,&nbsp;C MacKenzie,&nbsp;J Orasanu,&nbsp;R Spencer,&nbsp;A Rahman,&nbsp;V Gunawardane\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/107830299312104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine what information sources are used during a remote diagnosis task.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Experienced trauma care providers viewed segments of videotaped initial trauma patient resuscitation and airway management. Experiment 1 collected responses from anesthesiologists to probing questions during and after the presentation of recorded video materials. Experiment 2 collected the responses from three types of care providers (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons). Written and verbal responses were scored according to detection of critical events in video materials and categorized according to their content. Experiment 3 collected visual scanning data using an eyetracker during the viewing of recorded video materials from the three types of care providers. Eye-gaze data were analyzed in terms of focus on various parts of the videotaped materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Care providers were found to be unable to detect several critical events. The three groups of subjects studied (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons) focused on different aspects of videotaped materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the remote events and activities are multidisciplinary and rapidly changing, experts linked with audio-video-data connections may encounter difficulties in comprehending remote activities, and their information usage may be biased. Special training is needed for the remote decision-maker to appreciate tasks outside his or her speciality and beyond the boundaries of traditional divisions of labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"139-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312104\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目的:确定在远程诊断任务中使用的信息源。材料和方法:经验丰富的创伤护理人员观看了创伤患者最初复苏和气道管理的录像片段。实验1收集了麻醉师在播放录制的视频材料期间和之后对探索性问题的回答。实验2收集了三种类型的护理提供者(麻醉师、护士和外科医生)的回答。根据视频材料中关键事件的检测对书面和口头回答进行评分,并根据其内容进行分类。实验3使用眼动仪采集三种护理提供者在观看录像资料时的视觉扫描数据。通过对录像材料各部分的聚焦来分析眼球注视数据。结果:发现护理人员无法检测到几个关键事件。三组研究对象(麻醉师、护士和外科医生)关注录像材料的不同方面。结论:当远程事件和活动是多学科和快速变化时,与音视频数据联系在一起的专家可能在理解远程活动时遇到困难,他们的信息使用可能有偏见。需要对远程决策者进行特殊培训,以了解其专业以外和传统分工界限之外的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information acquisition from audio-video-data sources: an experimental study on remote diagnosis. The LOTAS Group.

Objective: To determine what information sources are used during a remote diagnosis task.

Materials and methods: Experienced trauma care providers viewed segments of videotaped initial trauma patient resuscitation and airway management. Experiment 1 collected responses from anesthesiologists to probing questions during and after the presentation of recorded video materials. Experiment 2 collected the responses from three types of care providers (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons). Written and verbal responses were scored according to detection of critical events in video materials and categorized according to their content. Experiment 3 collected visual scanning data using an eyetracker during the viewing of recorded video materials from the three types of care providers. Eye-gaze data were analyzed in terms of focus on various parts of the videotaped materials.

Results: Care providers were found to be unable to detect several critical events. The three groups of subjects studied (anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons) focused on different aspects of videotaped materials.

Conclusion: When the remote events and activities are multidisciplinary and rapidly changing, experts linked with audio-video-data connections may encounter difficulties in comprehending remote activities, and their information usage may be biased. Special training is needed for the remote decision-maker to appreciate tasks outside his or her speciality and beyond the boundaries of traditional divisions of labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信