青光眼的远程医疗筛查。

H K Li, R A Tang, K Oschner, C Koplos, J Grady, W J Crump
{"title":"青光眼的远程医疗筛查。","authors":"H K Li,&nbsp;R A Tang,&nbsp;K Oschner,&nbsp;C Koplos,&nbsp;J Grady,&nbsp;W J Crump","doi":"10.1089/107830299312032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Glaucoma is a major cause of blindness. More than 80,000 Americans suffer permanent vision loss from the disease. Widespread screening is fundamental in limiting the incidence of glaucoma-associated blindness. This pilot study explored the use of stereo digital images taken at a primary care center for telemedicine review by an off-site specialist as a means of screening for glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two diabetic patients were screened at a family medicine clinic. None had previously been diagnosed with glaucoma. A senior optometry student took stereoscopic digital and 35-mm optic disc photographs with a nonmydriatic retinal camera. The digital images were forwarded to a remote ophthalmologist for review. The conventional color stereo slide pairs of the same eyes were subsequently reviewed for comparison. Agreement on signs of glaucomatous disc changes between the two imaging systems was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six of 32 eyes' digital and 35-mm photographs were analyzed. Six of 32 eyes (18.8%) could not be compared due to lack of matching 35-mm slides or digital images. Out of 26 eyes, lamina cribosa visibility was undeterminable in 8 eyes' digital images and 3 other eyes' 35-mm slides. Agreement among digital images and 35-mm slides of the remaining eyes was: 100%-vertical elongation, barring of vessels, bayoneting of vessels, and drance hemorrhage; 96.2%-focus notching of rim and rim pallor; 93.3%-lamina cribosa visability; 92. 3%-overpass cupping; 88.5%-focal enlargement; 84.6%-parapapillary halo; 80%-nerve fiber visibility; 65.4%-parapapillary atrophy. Parapapillary halo (p = 0.046) and nerve fiber layer visibility (p = 0.18) were detected on some 35-mm slides but not seen on matching digital views.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluations of cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) using both methods were in general agreement. However, some digital images were noted as too dark for assessing fine glaucomatous disc changes. Stereo digital images taken with a nonmydriatic camera by nonophthalmic photographers is a promising alternative for glaucoma screening in primary care settings. Telemedicine offers efficient communications with off-site glaucoma specialists. A larger study population is necessary to determine the overall effectiveness of using stereo digital imagery and teleophthalmology for glaucoma screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"5 3","pages":"283-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312032","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine screening of glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"H K Li,&nbsp;R A Tang,&nbsp;K Oschner,&nbsp;C Koplos,&nbsp;J Grady,&nbsp;W J Crump\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/107830299312032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Glaucoma is a major cause of blindness. More than 80,000 Americans suffer permanent vision loss from the disease. Widespread screening is fundamental in limiting the incidence of glaucoma-associated blindness. This pilot study explored the use of stereo digital images taken at a primary care center for telemedicine review by an off-site specialist as a means of screening for glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two diabetic patients were screened at a family medicine clinic. None had previously been diagnosed with glaucoma. A senior optometry student took stereoscopic digital and 35-mm optic disc photographs with a nonmydriatic retinal camera. The digital images were forwarded to a remote ophthalmologist for review. The conventional color stereo slide pairs of the same eyes were subsequently reviewed for comparison. Agreement on signs of glaucomatous disc changes between the two imaging systems was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six of 32 eyes' digital and 35-mm photographs were analyzed. Six of 32 eyes (18.8%) could not be compared due to lack of matching 35-mm slides or digital images. Out of 26 eyes, lamina cribosa visibility was undeterminable in 8 eyes' digital images and 3 other eyes' 35-mm slides. Agreement among digital images and 35-mm slides of the remaining eyes was: 100%-vertical elongation, barring of vessels, bayoneting of vessels, and drance hemorrhage; 96.2%-focus notching of rim and rim pallor; 93.3%-lamina cribosa visability; 92. 3%-overpass cupping; 88.5%-focal enlargement; 84.6%-parapapillary halo; 80%-nerve fiber visibility; 65.4%-parapapillary atrophy. Parapapillary halo (p = 0.046) and nerve fiber layer visibility (p = 0.18) were detected on some 35-mm slides but not seen on matching digital views.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluations of cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) using both methods were in general agreement. However, some digital images were noted as too dark for assessing fine glaucomatous disc changes. Stereo digital images taken with a nonmydriatic camera by nonophthalmic photographers is a promising alternative for glaucoma screening in primary care settings. Telemedicine offers efficient communications with off-site glaucoma specialists. A larger study population is necessary to determine the overall effectiveness of using stereo digital imagery and teleophthalmology for glaucoma screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"283-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312032\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

目的:青光眼是致盲的主要原因。超过8万美国人因这种疾病而永久性失明。广泛的筛查是限制青光眼相关性失明发生率的基础。这项初步研究探索了在初级保健中心由非现场专家拍摄的立体数字图像作为青光眼筛查的一种手段,用于远程医疗审查。材料与方法:对某家庭医学门诊32例糖尿病患者进行筛查。之前没有人被诊断为青光眼。一名验光专业的高年级学生用非散光视网膜相机拍摄了立体数码和35毫米视盘照片。这些数字图像被转发给远程眼科医生进行检查。随后对相同眼睛的常规彩色立体幻灯片进行了比较。分析两种成像系统对青光眼椎间盘改变征象的一致性。结果:对32只眼的数码及35mm照片26张进行分析。32只眼睛中有6只(18.8%)由于缺乏匹配的35毫米幻灯片或数字图像而无法进行比较。在26只眼中,8只眼的数字图像和3只眼的35-mm玻片的克里波层可见性无法确定。其余眼的数字图像与35mm玻片的一致性为:100%垂直延伸,血管阻塞,血管刺刀,出血;96.2%聚焦凹痕的边缘和边缘苍白;93.3%—椎板可见度;92. 3%天桥拔火罐等;焦点扩大88.5%;84.6% -parapapillary光环;80%-神经纤维可见度;-parapapillary萎缩65.4%。在一些35毫米的切片上检测到乳头旁晕(p = 0.046)和神经纤维层可见性(p = 0.18),但在匹配的数字视图上未见。结论:两种方法评价杯盘比(C/D)基本一致。然而,一些数字图像在评估青光眼椎间盘的细微变化时被认为太暗。由非眼科摄影师用非散光相机拍摄的立体数字图像是初级保健机构青光眼筛查的一个很有前途的选择。远程医疗提供了与非现场青光眼专家的有效沟通。更大的研究人群是必要的,以确定使用立体数字图像和远程眼科青光眼筛查的总体有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telemedicine screening of glaucoma.

Objectives: Glaucoma is a major cause of blindness. More than 80,000 Americans suffer permanent vision loss from the disease. Widespread screening is fundamental in limiting the incidence of glaucoma-associated blindness. This pilot study explored the use of stereo digital images taken at a primary care center for telemedicine review by an off-site specialist as a means of screening for glaucoma.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two diabetic patients were screened at a family medicine clinic. None had previously been diagnosed with glaucoma. A senior optometry student took stereoscopic digital and 35-mm optic disc photographs with a nonmydriatic retinal camera. The digital images were forwarded to a remote ophthalmologist for review. The conventional color stereo slide pairs of the same eyes were subsequently reviewed for comparison. Agreement on signs of glaucomatous disc changes between the two imaging systems was analyzed.

Results: Twenty-six of 32 eyes' digital and 35-mm photographs were analyzed. Six of 32 eyes (18.8%) could not be compared due to lack of matching 35-mm slides or digital images. Out of 26 eyes, lamina cribosa visibility was undeterminable in 8 eyes' digital images and 3 other eyes' 35-mm slides. Agreement among digital images and 35-mm slides of the remaining eyes was: 100%-vertical elongation, barring of vessels, bayoneting of vessels, and drance hemorrhage; 96.2%-focus notching of rim and rim pallor; 93.3%-lamina cribosa visability; 92. 3%-overpass cupping; 88.5%-focal enlargement; 84.6%-parapapillary halo; 80%-nerve fiber visibility; 65.4%-parapapillary atrophy. Parapapillary halo (p = 0.046) and nerve fiber layer visibility (p = 0.18) were detected on some 35-mm slides but not seen on matching digital views.

Conclusion: Evaluations of cup-to-disc ratio (C/D) using both methods were in general agreement. However, some digital images were noted as too dark for assessing fine glaucomatous disc changes. Stereo digital images taken with a nonmydriatic camera by nonophthalmic photographers is a promising alternative for glaucoma screening in primary care settings. Telemedicine offers efficient communications with off-site glaucoma specialists. A larger study population is necessary to determine the overall effectiveness of using stereo digital imagery and teleophthalmology for glaucoma screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信