E A Krupinski, B LeSueur, L Ellsworth, N Levine, R Hansen, N Silvis, P Sarantopoulos, P Hite, J Wurzel, R S Weinstein, A M Lopez
{"title":"远程皮肤科用数码相机的诊断准确性和图像质量。","authors":"E A Krupinski, B LeSueur, L Ellsworth, N Levine, R Hansen, N Silvis, P Sarantopoulos, P Hite, J Wurzel, R S Weinstein, A M Lopez","doi":"10.1089/107830299312005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital photography for dermatologic diagnoses and compare it with in-person diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients referred for specialty consultations (n = 308) were recruited from a university dermatology clinic. Patients were examined in-person by one of three board-certified dermatologists who provided clinical diagnoses. Digital photos were obtained on all patients and were evaluated as computer images by a panel of dermatologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 83% concordance between in-person versus digital photo diagnoses. Intradermatologist concordance averaged 84%, and interdermatologist concordance averaged 81%. Decision confidence was rated as \"very definite\" to \"definite\" 62% of the time. Concordance with biopsy results was achieved in 76% of the cases. Image sharpness and color quality were rated \"good\" to \"excellent\" 83% and 93% of the time, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital photography for store-and-forward teledermatology produces high-quality images and diagnostic concordance rates that compare favorably with in-person clinical diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"5 3","pages":"257-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312005","citationCount":"168","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology.\",\"authors\":\"E A Krupinski, B LeSueur, L Ellsworth, N Levine, R Hansen, N Silvis, P Sarantopoulos, P Hite, J Wurzel, R S Weinstein, A M Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/107830299312005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital photography for dermatologic diagnoses and compare it with in-person diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients referred for specialty consultations (n = 308) were recruited from a university dermatology clinic. Patients were examined in-person by one of three board-certified dermatologists who provided clinical diagnoses. Digital photos were obtained on all patients and were evaluated as computer images by a panel of dermatologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was 83% concordance between in-person versus digital photo diagnoses. Intradermatologist concordance averaged 84%, and interdermatologist concordance averaged 81%. Decision confidence was rated as \\\"very definite\\\" to \\\"definite\\\" 62% of the time. Concordance with biopsy results was achieved in 76% of the cases. Image sharpness and color quality were rated \\\"good\\\" to \\\"excellent\\\" 83% and 93% of the time, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital photography for store-and-forward teledermatology produces high-quality images and diagnostic concordance rates that compare favorably with in-person clinical diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"257-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312005\",\"citationCount\":\"168\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology.
Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital photography for dermatologic diagnoses and compare it with in-person diagnoses.
Materials and methods: Patients referred for specialty consultations (n = 308) were recruited from a university dermatology clinic. Patients were examined in-person by one of three board-certified dermatologists who provided clinical diagnoses. Digital photos were obtained on all patients and were evaluated as computer images by a panel of dermatologists.
Results: There was 83% concordance between in-person versus digital photo diagnoses. Intradermatologist concordance averaged 84%, and interdermatologist concordance averaged 81%. Decision confidence was rated as "very definite" to "definite" 62% of the time. Concordance with biopsy results was achieved in 76% of the cases. Image sharpness and color quality were rated "good" to "excellent" 83% and 93% of the time, respectively.
Conclusion: Digital photography for store-and-forward teledermatology produces high-quality images and diagnostic concordance rates that compare favorably with in-person clinical diagnoses.