什么类型的填充物?牙科修复的最佳实践。

B L Chadwick, P M Dummer, F D Dunstan, A S Gilmour, R J Jones, C J Phillips, J Rees, S Richmond, J Stevens, E T Treasure
{"title":"什么类型的填充物?牙科修复的最佳实践。","authors":"B L Chadwick, P M Dummer, F D Dunstan, A S Gilmour, R J Jones, C J Phillips, J Rees, S Richmond, J Stevens, E T Treasure","doi":"10.1136/qshc.8.3.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dental caries (tooth decay) is one of the most common diseases, with approximately 80% of the population in developed countries having experienced the condition. If decay has not been prevented cavities develop. To prevent considerable pain and tooth loss it may be necessary to remove the diseased tissues and restore the cavities (a filling). Restorations have a limited lifespan and, once a tooth is restored, the filling is likely to be replaced several times in the patient’s lifetime. Studies in the UK suggest that much of restorative dentistry is replacement of existing restorations, accounting for around 60% of all restorative work. Similar figures have been found in other parts of Europe, 4 and the USA. (Quality in Health Care 1999;8:202–207) There is a large choice of materials which can be used for fillings. Many are introduced into the market place and used on patients with limited evidence that they are more eVective or robust than existing materials. Consequently, one of the key questions is, all other things being equal, what type of filling is best? This paper summarises the results of a systematic review of the relative longevity and cost eVectiveness of routine intracoronal dental restorations, which formed the basis of a recent issue of EVective Health Care. The reasons for replacing a restoration are numerous and vary with tooth type and restorative material. Once inserted, restorations may fail at variable rates due to various “objective” factors aVecting both the failure of the filling material and further decay of the tooth around the filling. These factors include the characteristics of the filling material and eVect modifiers related to operator skill and technique, patients’ dental characteristics, and the environment around the tooth. The decision to replace a restoration is also influenced by more subjective factors such as dentists’ interpretation of the restoration’s condition and the health of the tooth, the criteria used to define failure, and patient demand. These decisions are subject to much variation. 10 A lack of standardisation exists, and no generally agreed criteria are used to decide when a restoration requires replacement. Types of restoration Tooth restorations may be classified as intracoronal, when they are placed within a cavity prepared in the crown of a tooth, or extracoronal, when they are placed around (outside) the tooth as in the case of a crown. Intracoronal restorations are usually placed directly into the tooth cavity and normally consist of a mouldable material that sets and becomes rigid; the material is retained by the surrounding walls of the remaining tooth tissue. An alternative intracoronal restoration uses an indirect technique; here an impression of the cavity is taken and a laboratory constructed inlay is produced and subsequently cemented into the prepared cavity. The materials currently used to restore intracoronal preparations are: dental amalgam, composite resins, glass ionomer cements, resin modified glass ionomer cements, compomers and cermets, cast gold, and other alloys inlays and porcelain (box 1).","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"8 3","pages":"202-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.3.202","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.\",\"authors\":\"B L Chadwick, P M Dummer, F D Dunstan, A S Gilmour, R J Jones, C J Phillips, J Rees, S Richmond, J Stevens, E T Treasure\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/qshc.8.3.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dental caries (tooth decay) is one of the most common diseases, with approximately 80% of the population in developed countries having experienced the condition. If decay has not been prevented cavities develop. To prevent considerable pain and tooth loss it may be necessary to remove the diseased tissues and restore the cavities (a filling). Restorations have a limited lifespan and, once a tooth is restored, the filling is likely to be replaced several times in the patient’s lifetime. Studies in the UK suggest that much of restorative dentistry is replacement of existing restorations, accounting for around 60% of all restorative work. Similar figures have been found in other parts of Europe, 4 and the USA. (Quality in Health Care 1999;8:202–207) There is a large choice of materials which can be used for fillings. Many are introduced into the market place and used on patients with limited evidence that they are more eVective or robust than existing materials. Consequently, one of the key questions is, all other things being equal, what type of filling is best? This paper summarises the results of a systematic review of the relative longevity and cost eVectiveness of routine intracoronal dental restorations, which formed the basis of a recent issue of EVective Health Care. The reasons for replacing a restoration are numerous and vary with tooth type and restorative material. Once inserted, restorations may fail at variable rates due to various “objective” factors aVecting both the failure of the filling material and further decay of the tooth around the filling. These factors include the characteristics of the filling material and eVect modifiers related to operator skill and technique, patients’ dental characteristics, and the environment around the tooth. The decision to replace a restoration is also influenced by more subjective factors such as dentists’ interpretation of the restoration’s condition and the health of the tooth, the criteria used to define failure, and patient demand. These decisions are subject to much variation. 10 A lack of standardisation exists, and no generally agreed criteria are used to decide when a restoration requires replacement. Types of restoration Tooth restorations may be classified as intracoronal, when they are placed within a cavity prepared in the crown of a tooth, or extracoronal, when they are placed around (outside) the tooth as in the case of a crown. Intracoronal restorations are usually placed directly into the tooth cavity and normally consist of a mouldable material that sets and becomes rigid; the material is retained by the surrounding walls of the remaining tooth tissue. An alternative intracoronal restoration uses an indirect technique; here an impression of the cavity is taken and a laboratory constructed inlay is produced and subsequently cemented into the prepared cavity. The materials currently used to restore intracoronal preparations are: dental amalgam, composite resins, glass ionomer cements, resin modified glass ionomer cements, compomers and cermets, cast gold, and other alloys inlays and porcelain (box 1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"202-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.3.202\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in health care : QHC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.3.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.3.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.
Dental caries (tooth decay) is one of the most common diseases, with approximately 80% of the population in developed countries having experienced the condition. If decay has not been prevented cavities develop. To prevent considerable pain and tooth loss it may be necessary to remove the diseased tissues and restore the cavities (a filling). Restorations have a limited lifespan and, once a tooth is restored, the filling is likely to be replaced several times in the patient’s lifetime. Studies in the UK suggest that much of restorative dentistry is replacement of existing restorations, accounting for around 60% of all restorative work. Similar figures have been found in other parts of Europe, 4 and the USA. (Quality in Health Care 1999;8:202–207) There is a large choice of materials which can be used for fillings. Many are introduced into the market place and used on patients with limited evidence that they are more eVective or robust than existing materials. Consequently, one of the key questions is, all other things being equal, what type of filling is best? This paper summarises the results of a systematic review of the relative longevity and cost eVectiveness of routine intracoronal dental restorations, which formed the basis of a recent issue of EVective Health Care. The reasons for replacing a restoration are numerous and vary with tooth type and restorative material. Once inserted, restorations may fail at variable rates due to various “objective” factors aVecting both the failure of the filling material and further decay of the tooth around the filling. These factors include the characteristics of the filling material and eVect modifiers related to operator skill and technique, patients’ dental characteristics, and the environment around the tooth. The decision to replace a restoration is also influenced by more subjective factors such as dentists’ interpretation of the restoration’s condition and the health of the tooth, the criteria used to define failure, and patient demand. These decisions are subject to much variation. 10 A lack of standardisation exists, and no generally agreed criteria are used to decide when a restoration requires replacement. Types of restoration Tooth restorations may be classified as intracoronal, when they are placed within a cavity prepared in the crown of a tooth, or extracoronal, when they are placed around (outside) the tooth as in the case of a crown. Intracoronal restorations are usually placed directly into the tooth cavity and normally consist of a mouldable material that sets and becomes rigid; the material is retained by the surrounding walls of the remaining tooth tissue. An alternative intracoronal restoration uses an indirect technique; here an impression of the cavity is taken and a laboratory constructed inlay is produced and subsequently cemented into the prepared cavity. The materials currently used to restore intracoronal preparations are: dental amalgam, composite resins, glass ionomer cements, resin modified glass ionomer cements, compomers and cermets, cast gold, and other alloys inlays and porcelain (box 1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信