J R Furundarena, A Ibisate, Y Burguete, E González de Langarica, N González, R Urquiza, A Mendizabal, N Hernando, C Pérez Clausell
{"title":"[Rh (D)异体免疫与妊娠。]预防用药后原因分析[j]。","authors":"J R Furundarena, A Ibisate, Y Burguete, E González de Langarica, N González, R Urquiza, A Mendizabal, N Hernando, C Pérez Clausell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prenatal and postnatal prophylaxis of the Rh (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn have clearly reduced the number of cases but still there are alloimmunizations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All cases detected in our Hospital in the last 24 years have been reviewed and possible causes analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 10,332 deliveries in Rh (D) negative women we have detected 114 anti-D in 86 women. In 74 women anti-D was the only antibody and in 12 there were more antibodies. Data were managed in 3-year periods and we see a progressive decrease in the incidence of alloimmunization with a minimum of 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies in the period 89-91 and a posterior progression to an incidence of 0.12 in the last 3-year period 95-97. The causes were: pregnancies before 1970 in 31, incorrect prophylaxis in 12, despite a correct prophylaxis in 6, previous pregnancies without complete information about the prophylaxis in 13, previous transfusion in 6, previous pregnancies or transfusion in 8 and indetermined in 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is desirable to reduce at minimum the number of Rh (D) alloimmunizations by strictly following the prophylaxis protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":76513,"journal":{"name":"Sangre","volume":"44 6","pages":"429-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rh (D) alloimmunization and pregnancy. Analysis of the causes after prophylaxis introduction].\",\"authors\":\"J R Furundarena, A Ibisate, Y Burguete, E González de Langarica, N González, R Urquiza, A Mendizabal, N Hernando, C Pérez Clausell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prenatal and postnatal prophylaxis of the Rh (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn have clearly reduced the number of cases but still there are alloimmunizations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All cases detected in our Hospital in the last 24 years have been reviewed and possible causes analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 10,332 deliveries in Rh (D) negative women we have detected 114 anti-D in 86 women. In 74 women anti-D was the only antibody and in 12 there were more antibodies. Data were managed in 3-year periods and we see a progressive decrease in the incidence of alloimmunization with a minimum of 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies in the period 89-91 and a posterior progression to an incidence of 0.12 in the last 3-year period 95-97. The causes were: pregnancies before 1970 in 31, incorrect prophylaxis in 12, despite a correct prophylaxis in 6, previous pregnancies without complete information about the prophylaxis in 13, previous transfusion in 6, previous pregnancies or transfusion in 8 and indetermined in 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is desirable to reduce at minimum the number of Rh (D) alloimmunizations by strictly following the prophylaxis protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sangre\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"429-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sangre\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Rh (D) alloimmunization and pregnancy. Analysis of the causes after prophylaxis introduction].
Purpose: Prenatal and postnatal prophylaxis of the Rh (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn have clearly reduced the number of cases but still there are alloimmunizations.
Patients and methods: All cases detected in our Hospital in the last 24 years have been reviewed and possible causes analyzed.
Results: From a total of 10,332 deliveries in Rh (D) negative women we have detected 114 anti-D in 86 women. In 74 women anti-D was the only antibody and in 12 there were more antibodies. Data were managed in 3-year periods and we see a progressive decrease in the incidence of alloimmunization with a minimum of 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies in the period 89-91 and a posterior progression to an incidence of 0.12 in the last 3-year period 95-97. The causes were: pregnancies before 1970 in 31, incorrect prophylaxis in 12, despite a correct prophylaxis in 6, previous pregnancies without complete information about the prophylaxis in 13, previous transfusion in 6, previous pregnancies or transfusion in 8 and indetermined in 10.
Conclusion: It is desirable to reduce at minimum the number of Rh (D) alloimmunizations by strictly following the prophylaxis protocols.