[用充满液体的压力管系统测量侵入性血压有多准确?]

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 2000-01-01
A Francke, H Wachsmuth
{"title":"[用充满液体的压力管系统测量侵入性血压有多准确?]","authors":"A Francke,&nbsp;H Wachsmuth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been discussed by other authors that clinically relevant mistakes can occur in the measurement of invasive blood pressure. For this reason, we investigated all pressure lines used in our hospital. Our studies showed that exact measurement of invasive blood pressure using fluid-filled pressure measuring systems is not possible in the arterial, venous or pulmonal-arterial areas. Iatrogen mistakes should be excluded by working carefully. Exact knowledge of the physical qualities and the dynamic response of the fluid-filled pressure line used is required for judging the measuring accuracy. In clinical practice, measurement errors can amount to 40%. An acknowledged method to verifying errors is the Gabarith system developed by Billiet and Colardyn, which can determine the extent of the biggest-possible error after investigating the pressure line. A reduction of measurement error to below 2% can be achieved by carefully combining the individual components of the measuring system and, if necessary, by using an industrially-produced damping device (resonance overshoot eliminator [R.O.S.E.]). In this way, standardized measuring systems can be made available for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"25 2","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How accurate is invasive blood pressure determination with fluid-filled pressure line systems?].\",\"authors\":\"A Francke,&nbsp;H Wachsmuth\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has been discussed by other authors that clinically relevant mistakes can occur in the measurement of invasive blood pressure. For this reason, we investigated all pressure lines used in our hospital. Our studies showed that exact measurement of invasive blood pressure using fluid-filled pressure measuring systems is not possible in the arterial, venous or pulmonal-arterial areas. Iatrogen mistakes should be excluded by working carefully. Exact knowledge of the physical qualities and the dynamic response of the fluid-filled pressure line used is required for judging the measuring accuracy. In clinical practice, measurement errors can amount to 40%. An acknowledged method to verifying errors is the Gabarith system developed by Billiet and Colardyn, which can determine the extent of the biggest-possible error after investigating the pressure line. A reduction of measurement error to below 2% can be achieved by carefully combining the individual components of the measuring system and, if necessary, by using an industrially-produced damping device (resonance overshoot eliminator [R.O.S.E.]). In this way, standardized measuring systems can be made available for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"46-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

其他作者已经讨论过,在测量侵入性血压时可能出现临床相关的错误。为此,我们调查了我院使用的所有压力管线。我们的研究表明,在动脉、静脉或肺动脉区域,使用充液压力测量系统精确测量侵入性血压是不可能的。应通过仔细工作来排除医疗错误。要判断测量精度,需要准确了解所使用的充液压力线的物理特性和动态响应。在临床实践中,测量误差可达40%。一种公认的验证误差的方法是由Billiet和Colardyn开发的Gabarith系统,它可以在调查压力线后确定最大可能误差的程度。通过仔细组合测量系统的各个组件,并在必要时使用工业生产的阻尼装置(共振超调消除器[R.O.S.E.]),可以将测量误差降低到2%以下。通过这种方式,标准化的测量系统可以用于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[How accurate is invasive blood pressure determination with fluid-filled pressure line systems?].

It has been discussed by other authors that clinically relevant mistakes can occur in the measurement of invasive blood pressure. For this reason, we investigated all pressure lines used in our hospital. Our studies showed that exact measurement of invasive blood pressure using fluid-filled pressure measuring systems is not possible in the arterial, venous or pulmonal-arterial areas. Iatrogen mistakes should be excluded by working carefully. Exact knowledge of the physical qualities and the dynamic response of the fluid-filled pressure line used is required for judging the measuring accuracy. In clinical practice, measurement errors can amount to 40%. An acknowledged method to verifying errors is the Gabarith system developed by Billiet and Colardyn, which can determine the extent of the biggest-possible error after investigating the pressure line. A reduction of measurement error to below 2% can be achieved by carefully combining the individual components of the measuring system and, if necessary, by using an industrially-produced damping device (resonance overshoot eliminator [R.O.S.E.]). In this way, standardized measuring systems can be made available for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信