以手册为基础的治疗焦虑症青年的治疗师灵活性的回顾性自我报告。

P C Kendall, B C Chu
{"title":"以手册为基础的治疗焦虑症青年的治疗师灵活性的回顾性自我报告。","authors":"P C Kendall,&nbsp;B C Chu","doi":"10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluated retrospective therapist ratings of the flexibility used when applying the procedures and strategies prescribed in the treatment manual. Flexibility ratings were collected from 18 therapists who had treated 148 children with anxiety disorders (ages 9 through 13). Analyses revealed strong reliabilities for a flexibility questionnaire and that flexibility was used by therapists; however, significant relations between therapist-rated flexibility and treatment outcome were not found. Discussion focuses on the role of flexibility in manual-based psychological treatments and future directions for study.</p>","PeriodicalId":79502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical child psychology","volume":"29 2","pages":"209-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective self-reports of therapist flexibility in a manual-based treatment for youths with anxiety disorders.\",\"authors\":\"P C Kendall,&nbsp;B C Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evaluated retrospective therapist ratings of the flexibility used when applying the procedures and strategies prescribed in the treatment manual. Flexibility ratings were collected from 18 therapists who had treated 148 children with anxiety disorders (ages 9 through 13). Analyses revealed strong reliabilities for a flexibility questionnaire and that flexibility was used by therapists; however, significant relations between therapist-rated flexibility and treatment outcome were not found. Discussion focuses on the role of flexibility in manual-based psychological treatments and future directions for study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical child psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"209-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical child psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical child psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

评估回顾性治疗师在应用治疗手册中规定的程序和策略时所使用的灵活性评分。研究人员从18位治疗过148名患有焦虑症的儿童(9岁至13岁)的治疗师那里收集了灵活性评分。分析显示灵活性问卷具有很强的可靠性,并且治疗师使用灵活性问卷;然而,没有发现治疗师评价的灵活性与治疗结果之间的显著关系。讨论重点是灵活性在手工心理治疗中的作用和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective self-reports of therapist flexibility in a manual-based treatment for youths with anxiety disorders.

Evaluated retrospective therapist ratings of the flexibility used when applying the procedures and strategies prescribed in the treatment manual. Flexibility ratings were collected from 18 therapists who had treated 148 children with anxiety disorders (ages 9 through 13). Analyses revealed strong reliabilities for a flexibility questionnaire and that flexibility was used by therapists; however, significant relations between therapist-rated flexibility and treatment outcome were not found. Discussion focuses on the role of flexibility in manual-based psychological treatments and future directions for study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信