C A Haenggeli, P Dulguerov, D Slosman, M Becker, P Bang, A Allal, J P Guyot, W Lehmann
{"title":"[18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)在早期发现口咽喉癌残留肿瘤中的价值]。","authors":"C A Haenggeli, P Dulguerov, D Slosman, M Becker, P Bang, A Allal, J P Guyot, W Lehmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the performances of FDG-PET imaging, MRI and clinical examination in the detection of residual tumour 3 months after treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A consecutive sample of 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, or a cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary site excluding T1 lip and T1 vocal cord tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Treatment outcome was assessed after 3 months by clinical examination, MRI, and FDG-PET scan. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated relative to proven biopsy of residual tumour or a clinical follow-up of 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residual cancer was confirmed in 8 patients (16%), while the clinical follow-up was unsuspicious in the remaining 42 patients. PET-FDG had a sensitivity of 100% as compared to MRI (88%) and clinical examination (63%). Specificity was higher for clinical examination (90%), intermediate for MRI (83%) and lowest for PET-FDG (74%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study finds very high sensitivity for PET-FDG in the detection of residual tumour. However, its lower specificity, lack of anatomical resolution, and high cost, require further studies to determine its role in routine screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":76532,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum","volume":"116 ","pages":"8S-11S"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Value of positron emission tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in early detection of residual tumor in oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal carcinoma].\",\"authors\":\"C A Haenggeli, P Dulguerov, D Slosman, M Becker, P Bang, A Allal, J P Guyot, W Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the performances of FDG-PET imaging, MRI and clinical examination in the detection of residual tumour 3 months after treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A consecutive sample of 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, or a cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary site excluding T1 lip and T1 vocal cord tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Treatment outcome was assessed after 3 months by clinical examination, MRI, and FDG-PET scan. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated relative to proven biopsy of residual tumour or a clinical follow-up of 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residual cancer was confirmed in 8 patients (16%), while the clinical follow-up was unsuspicious in the remaining 42 patients. PET-FDG had a sensitivity of 100% as compared to MRI (88%) and clinical examination (63%). Specificity was higher for clinical examination (90%), intermediate for MRI (83%) and lowest for PET-FDG (74%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study finds very high sensitivity for PET-FDG in the detection of residual tumour. However, its lower specificity, lack of anatomical resolution, and high cost, require further studies to determine its role in routine screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"8S-11S\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Value of positron emission tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in early detection of residual tumor in oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal carcinoma].
Objective: To evaluate and compare the performances of FDG-PET imaging, MRI and clinical examination in the detection of residual tumour 3 months after treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients: A consecutive sample of 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, or a cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary site excluding T1 lip and T1 vocal cord tumours.
Methods: Treatment outcome was assessed after 3 months by clinical examination, MRI, and FDG-PET scan. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated relative to proven biopsy of residual tumour or a clinical follow-up of 4 months.
Results: Residual cancer was confirmed in 8 patients (16%), while the clinical follow-up was unsuspicious in the remaining 42 patients. PET-FDG had a sensitivity of 100% as compared to MRI (88%) and clinical examination (63%). Specificity was higher for clinical examination (90%), intermediate for MRI (83%) and lowest for PET-FDG (74%).
Conclusions: This study finds very high sensitivity for PET-FDG in the detection of residual tumour. However, its lower specificity, lack of anatomical resolution, and high cost, require further studies to determine its role in routine screening.