水胶体敷料对毛髓窦切除后二次愈合的影响。

V Viciano, J E Castera, J Medrano, J Aguiló, J Torro, M G Botella, N Toldrá
{"title":"水胶体敷料对毛髓窦切除后二次愈合的影响。","authors":"V Viciano,&nbsp;J E Castera,&nbsp;J Medrano,&nbsp;J Aguiló,&nbsp;J Torro,&nbsp;M G Botella,&nbsp;N Toldrá","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>District hospital, Spain.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009339","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.\",\"authors\":\"V Viciano,&nbsp;J E Castera,&nbsp;J Medrano,&nbsp;J Aguiló,&nbsp;J Torro,&nbsp;M G Botella,&nbsp;N Toldrá\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>District hospital, Spain.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

目的:评价水胶体敷料在毛髓窦切除术后创面处理中的应用效果。设计:前瞻性随机试验。地点:西班牙地区医院。患者:慢性毛髓窦38例。干预措施:第二次意向愈合的开放切除。分为常规纱布敷料组(对照组,n = 15)、Comfeel组(n = 12)和Varihesive组(n = 11)。主要观察指标:中位愈合时间、感染率、不耐受、疼痛、舒适、管理难易程度、渗漏和复发。结果:对照组的中位愈合时间为68天(范围33-168),两水胶体组的联合愈合时间为65天(范围40-137)。水胶体组间无差异。在74个月的随访中无复发。对照组三分之一的术后培养物出现致病菌,而使用水胶体敷料的患者只有1/23出现致病菌(p = 0.03)。这与临床无关。水胶体组14/23发生渗漏。水胶体组术后4周疼痛明显减轻,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:水胶体敷料可减轻毛毛窦切除术后患者的疼痛,增加患者的舒适度,但其愈合时间并不比常规纱布敷料缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.

Design: Prospective randomised trial.

Setting: District hospital, Spain.

Patients: 38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.

Interventions: Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).

Main outcome measures: Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.

Results: Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信