最近和遥远的灭绝线索减少了自发恢复。

D C Brooks
{"title":"最近和遥远的灭绝线索减少了自发恢复。","authors":"D C Brooks","doi":"10.1080/027249900392986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five appetitive conditioning experiments with rats examined the ability of extinction cues (ECs) to reduce spontaneous recovery after extinction procedures that varied the temporal relation between the ECs and the conditioned stimulus (CS) and included presentations of additional events (e.g. other stimuli correlated with extinction, CSs, and the US). In extinction, two different ECs were presented either closely in time before (i.e. recent to), or more distant (i.e. remote) from a nonreinforced CS. Both recent and remote ECs reduced spontaneous recovery to the CS when present during testing (Experiments 1-4). Each EC reduced recovery despite the addition during extinction of a second EC and CS (Experiments 1, 3, and 4), and the US (Experiment 3). Experiments 4 and 5 investigated the recent and remote ECs' tendency to control a serial occasion setting discrimination involving the target CS under explicit training conditions. Neither EC gained such discriminative control. Possible explanations of the results are discussed, including configural learning, occasion setting, and contextual cue control.</p>","PeriodicalId":77438,"journal":{"name":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"53 1","pages":"25-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/027249900392986","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent and remote extinction cues reduce spontaneous recovery.\",\"authors\":\"D C Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/027249900392986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Five appetitive conditioning experiments with rats examined the ability of extinction cues (ECs) to reduce spontaneous recovery after extinction procedures that varied the temporal relation between the ECs and the conditioned stimulus (CS) and included presentations of additional events (e.g. other stimuli correlated with extinction, CSs, and the US). In extinction, two different ECs were presented either closely in time before (i.e. recent to), or more distant (i.e. remote) from a nonreinforced CS. Both recent and remote ECs reduced spontaneous recovery to the CS when present during testing (Experiments 1-4). Each EC reduced recovery despite the addition during extinction of a second EC and CS (Experiments 1, 3, and 4), and the US (Experiment 3). Experiments 4 and 5 investigated the recent and remote ECs' tendency to control a serial occasion setting discrimination involving the target CS under explicit training conditions. Neither EC gained such discriminative control. Possible explanations of the results are discussed, including configural learning, occasion setting, and contextual cue control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"25-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/027249900392986\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/027249900392986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/027249900392986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五项大鼠食欲条件反射实验检测了消失线索(ECs)在消失过程后减少自发恢复的能力,这种消失过程改变了ECs与条件刺激(CS)之间的时间关系,并包括其他事件的呈现(例如与消失、CSs和US相关的其他刺激)。在灭绝中,两个不同的ec要么在时间上较近(即最近)出现,要么在距离非增强CS较远(即遥远)出现。在测试过程中,近期和远处的ECs都减少了自发恢复到CS(实验1-4)。尽管在第二个EC和CS消失期间增加了一个EC和CS(实验1、3和4),但每个EC都降低了恢复(实验3)。实验4和5研究了在显性训练条件下,最近和远程EC对涉及目标CS的一系列场合设置歧视的控制倾向。欧共体都没有获得这样的歧视性控制。对结果的可能解释进行了讨论,包括构形学习、场合设置和语境线索控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent and remote extinction cues reduce spontaneous recovery.

Five appetitive conditioning experiments with rats examined the ability of extinction cues (ECs) to reduce spontaneous recovery after extinction procedures that varied the temporal relation between the ECs and the conditioned stimulus (CS) and included presentations of additional events (e.g. other stimuli correlated with extinction, CSs, and the US). In extinction, two different ECs were presented either closely in time before (i.e. recent to), or more distant (i.e. remote) from a nonreinforced CS. Both recent and remote ECs reduced spontaneous recovery to the CS when present during testing (Experiments 1-4). Each EC reduced recovery despite the addition during extinction of a second EC and CS (Experiments 1, 3, and 4), and the US (Experiment 3). Experiments 4 and 5 investigated the recent and remote ECs' tendency to control a serial occasion setting discrimination involving the target CS under explicit training conditions. Neither EC gained such discriminative control. Possible explanations of the results are discussed, including configural learning, occasion setting, and contextual cue control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信