小肠梗阻治疗的上胃肠道对比研究——一项前瞻性随机研究。

B T Fevang, D Jensen, J Fevang, K Søndenaa, K Ovrebø, O Røkke, H Gislasson, K Svanes, A Viste
{"title":"小肠梗阻治疗的上胃肠道对比研究——一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"B T Fevang,&nbsp;D Jensen,&nbsp;J Fevang,&nbsp;K Søndenaa,&nbsp;K Ovrebø,&nbsp;O Røkke,&nbsp;H Gislasson,&nbsp;K Svanes,&nbsp;A Viste","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out whether contrast radiography helps to resolve small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Norway.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>98 consecutive patients with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and a plain abdominal radiograph that confirmed the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The patients were randomly allocated to receive a mixture of barium and sodium diatrizoate (Gastrografin) (n = 48) or not (n = 50). Both groups were followed up clinically and by repeated abdominal films.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Non-operative resolution of small bowel obstruction; number of patients with strangulated bowel; bowel resections; mortality; complications; hospital stay; and time from admission to operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of non-operative resolution (31/48 in contrast group, 35/50 in control group, OR: 0.89), strangulation obstruction (1/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.24), bowel resection (3/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.76), complications (8/48 in contrast group, 5/50 in control group, OR: 1.80), mortality (3/48 in contrast group, 1/50 in control group, OR: 3.26), and hospital stay (0-7 days: 34/48 in contrast group, 38/50 in control group, p = 0.95). The contrast group had a shorter interval between admission and operation than the control group (0-24 hours: 12/48 in contrast group, 3/50 in control group, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contrast examination did not contribute to the resolution of small bowel obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009681","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the management of small bowel obstruction--a prospective randomised study.\",\"authors\":\"B T Fevang,&nbsp;D Jensen,&nbsp;J Fevang,&nbsp;K Søndenaa,&nbsp;K Ovrebø,&nbsp;O Røkke,&nbsp;H Gislasson,&nbsp;K Svanes,&nbsp;A Viste\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/110241500750009681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out whether contrast radiography helps to resolve small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Norway.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>98 consecutive patients with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and a plain abdominal radiograph that confirmed the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The patients were randomly allocated to receive a mixture of barium and sodium diatrizoate (Gastrografin) (n = 48) or not (n = 50). Both groups were followed up clinically and by repeated abdominal films.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Non-operative resolution of small bowel obstruction; number of patients with strangulated bowel; bowel resections; mortality; complications; hospital stay; and time from admission to operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of non-operative resolution (31/48 in contrast group, 35/50 in control group, OR: 0.89), strangulation obstruction (1/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.24), bowel resection (3/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.76), complications (8/48 in contrast group, 5/50 in control group, OR: 1.80), mortality (3/48 in contrast group, 1/50 in control group, OR: 3.26), and hospital stay (0-7 days: 34/48 in contrast group, 38/50 in control group, p = 0.95). The contrast group had a shorter interval between admission and operation than the control group (0-24 hours: 12/48 in contrast group, 3/50 in control group, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contrast examination did not contribute to the resolution of small bowel obstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009681\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

目的:探讨造影是否有助于消除小肠梗阻。设计:前瞻性随机试验。地点:挪威大学医院。研究对象:连续98例有小肠梗阻症状并经腹部平片证实诊断的患者。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受钡和三角化钠混合治疗(n = 48)或不接受治疗(n = 50)。两组患者均接受临床随访和腹部重复影像检查。主要观察指标:小肠梗阻非手术解决;肠绞窄患者数;肠切除术;死亡率;并发症;住院;以及从入院到手术的时间。结果:两组间非手术消退发生率(对照组31/48,对照组35/50,OR: 0.89)、绞窄性梗阻发生率(对照组1/48,对照组4/50,OR: 0.24)、肠切除术发生率(对照组3/48,对照组4/50,OR: 0.76)、并发症发生率(对照组8/48,对照组5/50,OR: 1.80)、死亡率发生率(对照组3/48,对照组1/50,OR: 0.80)差异无统计学意义。3.26),住院时间(0-7天:对照组34/48,对照组38/50,p = 0.95)。对照组患者入院至手术时间间隔较对照组短(0 ~ 24 h:对照组12/48,对照组3/50,p = 0.005)。结论:造影检查对小肠梗阻的解决没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the management of small bowel obstruction--a prospective randomised study.

Objective: To find out whether contrast radiography helps to resolve small bowel obstruction.

Design: Prospective randomised trial.

Setting: University hospital, Norway.

Subjects: 98 consecutive patients with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and a plain abdominal radiograph that confirmed the diagnosis.

Interventions: The patients were randomly allocated to receive a mixture of barium and sodium diatrizoate (Gastrografin) (n = 48) or not (n = 50). Both groups were followed up clinically and by repeated abdominal films.

Main outcome measures: Non-operative resolution of small bowel obstruction; number of patients with strangulated bowel; bowel resections; mortality; complications; hospital stay; and time from admission to operation.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of non-operative resolution (31/48 in contrast group, 35/50 in control group, OR: 0.89), strangulation obstruction (1/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.24), bowel resection (3/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.76), complications (8/48 in contrast group, 5/50 in control group, OR: 1.80), mortality (3/48 in contrast group, 1/50 in control group, OR: 3.26), and hospital stay (0-7 days: 34/48 in contrast group, 38/50 in control group, p = 0.95). The contrast group had a shorter interval between admission and operation than the control group (0-24 hours: 12/48 in contrast group, 3/50 in control group, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: The contrast examination did not contribute to the resolution of small bowel obstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信