两个人类基因家族表现出对不同核苷酸的偏好,并具有不同的密码子使用模式。

C Skerka, W O Abel, P F Zipfel
{"title":"两个人类基因家族表现出对不同核苷酸的偏好,并具有不同的密码子使用模式。","authors":"C Skerka,&nbsp;W O Abel,&nbsp;P F Zipfel","doi":"10.1159/000019122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analysis of base composition has proven important for functional gene analysis. By comparing base composition and codon usage between two specific human gene families we were able to show a highly conserved nucleotide distribution among the members of one gene family and a significant difference between the two families. The two groups selected for analysis were the human factor H gene family, which represents six secreted human plasma proteins with functions in immune defense, and a class of four human zinc finger proteins, termed early growth response (EGR) proteins, which represent DNA-binding transcription factors. The nucleotide distribution of each gene family is distinct: members of the factor H gene family represent AT-rich genes, displaying an overall AT nucleotide content of 62.8% and a particular preference for A nucleotides (33.9%). In contrast, the EGR genes are GC-rich (55.9%) and C nucleotides are used in 31.2%. This nucleotide difference affects codon usage among synonymous codons and is considered of biological significance, as it affects DNA stability. The codon preference is particularly high at codon position 3, where each family selects for codons which have the preferred nucleotide at this silent third position. At position 3, A nucleotides are preferred by factor H genes in 36.3% of the 2, 503 codons analyzed, compared to 10% of the 1,876 codons analyzed for the EGR family. In contrast, C nucleotides are used by the EGR family in 48.1%, compared to 16% of the triplets used by the factor H gene family. This comparison of two human gene families shows that nucleotide distribution and codon usage is not uniform within the human organism and the described differences most likely represent selection constraints between the polymorphic factor H and highly conserved EGR genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77124,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical immunogenetics","volume":"17 1","pages":"29-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000019122","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two human gene families display preferences for different nucleotides and have distinct codon usage patterns.\",\"authors\":\"C Skerka,&nbsp;W O Abel,&nbsp;P F Zipfel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000019122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Analysis of base composition has proven important for functional gene analysis. By comparing base composition and codon usage between two specific human gene families we were able to show a highly conserved nucleotide distribution among the members of one gene family and a significant difference between the two families. The two groups selected for analysis were the human factor H gene family, which represents six secreted human plasma proteins with functions in immune defense, and a class of four human zinc finger proteins, termed early growth response (EGR) proteins, which represent DNA-binding transcription factors. The nucleotide distribution of each gene family is distinct: members of the factor H gene family represent AT-rich genes, displaying an overall AT nucleotide content of 62.8% and a particular preference for A nucleotides (33.9%). In contrast, the EGR genes are GC-rich (55.9%) and C nucleotides are used in 31.2%. This nucleotide difference affects codon usage among synonymous codons and is considered of biological significance, as it affects DNA stability. The codon preference is particularly high at codon position 3, where each family selects for codons which have the preferred nucleotide at this silent third position. At position 3, A nucleotides are preferred by factor H genes in 36.3% of the 2, 503 codons analyzed, compared to 10% of the 1,876 codons analyzed for the EGR family. In contrast, C nucleotides are used by the EGR family in 48.1%, compared to 16% of the triplets used by the factor H gene family. This comparison of two human gene families shows that nucleotide distribution and codon usage is not uniform within the human organism and the described differences most likely represent selection constraints between the polymorphic factor H and highly conserved EGR genes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical immunogenetics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"29-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000019122\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical immunogenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000019122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical immunogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000019122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

碱基组成分析对功能基因分析具有重要意义。通过比较两个特定人类基因家族之间的碱基组成和密码子使用,我们能够显示一个基因家族成员之间高度保守的核苷酸分布和两个家族之间的显着差异。选择用于分析的两组是人因子H基因家族,它代表六种具有免疫防御功能的分泌的人血浆蛋白,以及一类四种被称为早期生长反应(EGR)蛋白的人锌指蛋白,它们代表dna结合转录因子。每个基因家族的核苷酸分布是不同的:因子H基因家族的成员代表AT丰富的基因,显示出总体AT核苷酸含量为62.8%,特别偏爱a核苷酸(33.9%)。相比之下,EGR基因富含gc(55.9%),使用C核苷酸的占31.2%。这种核苷酸差异影响同义密码子之间密码子的使用,并被认为具有生物学意义,因为它影响DNA的稳定性。密码子偏好在密码子位置3特别高,每个家族都选择在这个沉默的第三个位置上具有首选核苷酸的密码子。在分析的2503个密码子中,36.3%的A核苷酸优先于因子H基因,而在EGR家族分析的1876个密码子中,这一比例为10%。相比之下,EGR家族使用C核苷酸的比例为48.1%,而因子H基因家族使用C核苷酸的比例为16%。这两个人类基因家族的比较表明,核苷酸分布和密码子使用在人类生物体内并不统一,所描述的差异很可能代表了多态性因子H和高度保守的EGR基因之间的选择约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two human gene families display preferences for different nucleotides and have distinct codon usage patterns.

Analysis of base composition has proven important for functional gene analysis. By comparing base composition and codon usage between two specific human gene families we were able to show a highly conserved nucleotide distribution among the members of one gene family and a significant difference between the two families. The two groups selected for analysis were the human factor H gene family, which represents six secreted human plasma proteins with functions in immune defense, and a class of four human zinc finger proteins, termed early growth response (EGR) proteins, which represent DNA-binding transcription factors. The nucleotide distribution of each gene family is distinct: members of the factor H gene family represent AT-rich genes, displaying an overall AT nucleotide content of 62.8% and a particular preference for A nucleotides (33.9%). In contrast, the EGR genes are GC-rich (55.9%) and C nucleotides are used in 31.2%. This nucleotide difference affects codon usage among synonymous codons and is considered of biological significance, as it affects DNA stability. The codon preference is particularly high at codon position 3, where each family selects for codons which have the preferred nucleotide at this silent third position. At position 3, A nucleotides are preferred by factor H genes in 36.3% of the 2, 503 codons analyzed, compared to 10% of the 1,876 codons analyzed for the EGR family. In contrast, C nucleotides are used by the EGR family in 48.1%, compared to 16% of the triplets used by the factor H gene family. This comparison of two human gene families shows that nucleotide distribution and codon usage is not uniform within the human organism and the described differences most likely represent selection constraints between the polymorphic factor H and highly conserved EGR genes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信