胎儿有核红细胞恢复:基于荧光激活细胞分选的阳性选择使用抗γ球蛋白与使用抗cd45耗尽和抗γ球蛋白阳性选择的磁激活细胞分选。

Cytometry Pub Date : 2000-03-01
J Y Wang, D K Zhen, V M Falco, A Farina, Y L Zheng, L C Delli-Bovi, D W Bianchi
{"title":"胎儿有核红细胞恢复:基于荧光激活细胞分选的阳性选择使用抗γ球蛋白与使用抗cd45耗尽和抗γ球蛋白阳性选择的磁激活细胞分选。","authors":"J Y Wang,&nbsp;D K Zhen,&nbsp;V M Falco,&nbsp;A Farina,&nbsp;Y L Zheng,&nbsp;L C Delli-Bovi,&nbsp;D W Bianchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-based anti-gamma (gamma) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)-based anti-CD45 depletion followed by anti-gamma positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti-gamma positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty-four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10947,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry","volume":"39 3","pages":"224-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: fluorescence activated cell sorting-based positive selection using anti-gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti-CD45 depletion and anti-gamma globin positive selection.\",\"authors\":\"J Y Wang,&nbsp;D K Zhen,&nbsp;V M Falco,&nbsp;A Farina,&nbsp;Y L Zheng,&nbsp;L C Delli-Bovi,&nbsp;D W Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-based anti-gamma (gamma) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)-based anti-CD45 depletion followed by anti-gamma positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti-gamma positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty-four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"224-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于荧光活化细胞分选(FACS)的抗γ (γ)阳性选择和基于磁活化细胞分选(MACS)的抗cd45耗尽然后进行抗γ阳性染色是两种最常用的从母体血液中分离胎儿细胞的方法。到目前为止,还没有这两种方法对胎儿细胞恢复的直接比较。本研究旨在解决这一问题。方法:用X和Y探针对有核抗γ阳性细胞进行荧光原位杂交(FISH)。在选择性终止妊娠后立即获得24份母体血液样本,以确保胎儿细胞的可检测数量。结果:FACS分选的胎儿有核红细胞(fnrbc)的产率和纯度均高于对照组(P < 0.01)。MACS分选标本fnrbc染色特异性较高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论:本研究的数据表明,这两种技术都有优点和局限性。FACS具有产率高、纯度高、FISH效率高、便于显微镜分析的优点,MACS具有特异性高、FISH过程中细胞损失少的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: fluorescence activated cell sorting-based positive selection using anti-gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti-CD45 depletion and anti-gamma globin positive selection.

Background: Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-based anti-gamma (gamma) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)-based anti-CD45 depletion followed by anti-gamma positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue.

Methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti-gamma positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty-four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells.

Results: The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信