扩大手术适应症和辅助白介素-2免疫治疗晚期肾细胞癌患者。

A Belldegrun, O Shvarts, R A Figlin
{"title":"扩大手术适应症和辅助白介素-2免疫治疗晚期肾细胞癌患者。","authors":"A Belldegrun,&nbsp;O Shvarts,&nbsp;R A Figlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the role of surgery and adjuvant interleukin (IL)-2-based immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The survival of 354 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IL-2-based immunotherapy through the UCLA Medical Center Kidney Cancer Program was analyzed There were five groups of patients. Patients who initially presented with metastatic disease received either (1) IL-2 therapy with primary tumor in place; (2) nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy, or (3) nephrectomy followed by immunotherapy with IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized disease were divided into two groups: (4) those who developed metastatic disease > or = 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy; and (5) those who developed metastatic disease < 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for all patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients who received IL-2-based immunotherapy with their primary tumor in place (group 1; n = 36), 1- and 2-year survival rates were 29% and 4%, respectively, compared with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 67% and 44%, respectively, for all similar patients who underwent nephrectomy prior to IL-2 therapy (n = 235). Among patients initially presenting with metastatic disease who underwent nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy without tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (group 2; n = 69), the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 53% and 25%, respectively. The best survival was observed in patients treated with nephrectomy followed by IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy (group 3; n = 102), which yielded 1- and 2-year survival rates of 73% and 55%, respectively. Among patients initially undergoing nephrectomy for localized disease, patients receiving IL-2-based therapy for subsequent metastasis > or = 6 months following nephrectomy (group 4; n = 128) had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 40%, respectively, compared with 45% and 15%, respectively, for patients developing metastasis < 6 months after nephrectomy (group 5; n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of surgery prior to IL-2-based immunotherapy remains controversial Our data demonstrate that aggressive surgery is safe, causing minimal morbidity despite extensive tumor involvement, and significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma when carried out in conjunction with an IL2-based immunotherapy regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":79462,"journal":{"name":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","volume":"6 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the indications for surgery and adjuvant interleukin-2-based immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"A Belldegrun,&nbsp;O Shvarts,&nbsp;R A Figlin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the role of surgery and adjuvant interleukin (IL)-2-based immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The survival of 354 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IL-2-based immunotherapy through the UCLA Medical Center Kidney Cancer Program was analyzed There were five groups of patients. Patients who initially presented with metastatic disease received either (1) IL-2 therapy with primary tumor in place; (2) nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy, or (3) nephrectomy followed by immunotherapy with IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized disease were divided into two groups: (4) those who developed metastatic disease > or = 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy; and (5) those who developed metastatic disease < 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for all patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients who received IL-2-based immunotherapy with their primary tumor in place (group 1; n = 36), 1- and 2-year survival rates were 29% and 4%, respectively, compared with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 67% and 44%, respectively, for all similar patients who underwent nephrectomy prior to IL-2 therapy (n = 235). Among patients initially presenting with metastatic disease who underwent nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy without tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (group 2; n = 69), the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 53% and 25%, respectively. The best survival was observed in patients treated with nephrectomy followed by IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy (group 3; n = 102), which yielded 1- and 2-year survival rates of 73% and 55%, respectively. Among patients initially undergoing nephrectomy for localized disease, patients receiving IL-2-based therapy for subsequent metastasis > or = 6 months following nephrectomy (group 4; n = 128) had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 40%, respectively, compared with 45% and 15%, respectively, for patients developing metastasis < 6 months after nephrectomy (group 5; n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of surgery prior to IL-2-based immunotherapy remains controversial Our data demonstrate that aggressive surgery is safe, causing minimal morbidity despite extensive tumor involvement, and significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma when carried out in conjunction with an IL2-based immunotherapy regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The cancer journal from Scientific American\",\"volume\":\"6 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"S88-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The cancer journal from Scientific American\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定手术和辅助IL-2免疫治疗在晚期转移性肾癌患者中的作用。患者和方法:通过UCLA医学中心肾癌项目对354例连续接受IL-2免疫治疗的转移性肾癌患者的生存进行分析。最初表现为转移性疾病的患者接受(1)原发肿瘤原位的IL-2治疗;(2)肾切除术后IL-2治疗,或(3)肾切除术后IL-2 +肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞免疫治疗。因局限性疾病行肾切除术的患者分为两组:(4)肾切除术后> = 6个月发生转移性疾病并接受IL-2治疗的患者;(5)肾切除术后发生转移性疾病< 6个月,然后接受IL-2治疗的患者。对所有患者组生成Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。结果:在原发肿瘤存在的情况下接受基于il -2的免疫治疗的患者中(1组;n = 36), 1年和2年生存率分别为29%和4%,而在IL-2治疗前接受肾切除术的所有类似患者(n = 235)的1年和2年生存率分别为67%和44%。在最初表现为转移性疾病的患者中,接受肾切除术后进行无肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的IL-2治疗(2组;N = 69), 1年和2年生存率分别为53%和25%。行肾切除术后IL-2 +肿瘤浸润性淋巴细胞治疗的患者生存率最高(3组;N = 102), 1年和2年生存率分别为73%和55%。在最初因局限性疾病接受肾切除术的患者中,因随后的转移而接受基于il -2治疗的患者在肾切除术后>或= 6个月(第4组;N = 128)的1年和2年生存率分别为64%和40%,而在肾切除术后< 6个月发生转移的患者中,生存率分别为45%和15%(第5组;N = 19)。结论:手术在基于il -2的免疫治疗之前的作用仍然存在争议。我们的数据表明,积极的手术是安全的,尽管肿瘤广泛累及,但发病率很小,并且当与基于il -2的免疫治疗方案联合进行时,可显著提高转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expanding the indications for surgery and adjuvant interleukin-2-based immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Purpose: To determine the role of surgery and adjuvant interleukin (IL)-2-based immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Patients and methods: The survival of 354 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IL-2-based immunotherapy through the UCLA Medical Center Kidney Cancer Program was analyzed There were five groups of patients. Patients who initially presented with metastatic disease received either (1) IL-2 therapy with primary tumor in place; (2) nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy, or (3) nephrectomy followed by immunotherapy with IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized disease were divided into two groups: (4) those who developed metastatic disease > or = 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy; and (5) those who developed metastatic disease < 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for all patient groups.

Results: Among patients who received IL-2-based immunotherapy with their primary tumor in place (group 1; n = 36), 1- and 2-year survival rates were 29% and 4%, respectively, compared with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 67% and 44%, respectively, for all similar patients who underwent nephrectomy prior to IL-2 therapy (n = 235). Among patients initially presenting with metastatic disease who underwent nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy without tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (group 2; n = 69), the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 53% and 25%, respectively. The best survival was observed in patients treated with nephrectomy followed by IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy (group 3; n = 102), which yielded 1- and 2-year survival rates of 73% and 55%, respectively. Among patients initially undergoing nephrectomy for localized disease, patients receiving IL-2-based therapy for subsequent metastasis > or = 6 months following nephrectomy (group 4; n = 128) had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 40%, respectively, compared with 45% and 15%, respectively, for patients developing metastasis < 6 months after nephrectomy (group 5; n = 19).

Conclusion: The role of surgery prior to IL-2-based immunotherapy remains controversial Our data demonstrate that aggressive surgery is safe, causing minimal morbidity despite extensive tumor involvement, and significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma when carried out in conjunction with an IL2-based immunotherapy regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信