在大肝切除术中选择性使用血管夹钳

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
D. Cherqui, D. Goëré, F. Brunetti, B. Malassagne, P.L. Fagniez
{"title":"在大肝切除术中选择性使用血管夹钳","authors":"D. Cherqui,&nbsp;D. Goëré,&nbsp;F. Brunetti,&nbsp;B. Malassagne,&nbsp;P.L. Fagniez","doi":"10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00074-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies.</p><p>Objective: To report the results of a selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies according to the size and location of the hepatic lesion.</p><p>Background: Total vascular exclusion (TVE) and portal triad clamping (PTC) ensure efficient hemostatic effect but lead to warm ischemia of the liver. Lobar vascular occlusion (LVO) avoids warm ischemia of the remnant liver but could result in increased blood loss.</p><p>Patients and methods: Sixty consecutive major hepatectomies were studied. TVE was applied in 22 patients with large lesions (=10 cm) or lesions with connections to the major hepatic veins or inferior vena cava. PTC (n=15) and LVO (n=23) were applied in remaining cases.</p><p>Results: Clamping method was efficient in 87%, 93% and 100% for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Median blood transfusions were 0,3 and 2 units for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Postoperative aminotransferase peak value was significantly lower after LVO than after PTC or TVE, while those peaks were not statistically different with these latter two methods. Postoperative prothrombin time fall value was identical in the three groups. Mortality was 3.3% (2/60) and was not influenced by the type of clamping, but both deaths and most complications occurred in patients with abnormal underlying liver parenchyma.</p><p>Conclusion: Provided that adequate techniques are used, the need for blood transfusions is more dependent on the characteristics of the resected tumor than on the type of clamping used. Total vascular exclusion does not create more ischemic injury to the liver than portal triad clamping and it should be recommended for the resection of large or strategically located tumors. Other tumors can be resected in more than 80% of the cases with LVO, thus avoiding ischemia to the remnant liver. With the control of hemorrhage, pathology of underlying liver parenchyma has emerged as the main prognostic factor in major liver resections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29786,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie","volume":"124 6","pages":"Pages 632-639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00074-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilisation sélective des clampages vasculaires au cours des hépatectomies majeures\",\"authors\":\"D. Cherqui,&nbsp;D. Goëré,&nbsp;F. Brunetti,&nbsp;B. Malassagne,&nbsp;P.L. Fagniez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00074-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies.</p><p>Objective: To report the results of a selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies according to the size and location of the hepatic lesion.</p><p>Background: Total vascular exclusion (TVE) and portal triad clamping (PTC) ensure efficient hemostatic effect but lead to warm ischemia of the liver. Lobar vascular occlusion (LVO) avoids warm ischemia of the remnant liver but could result in increased blood loss.</p><p>Patients and methods: Sixty consecutive major hepatectomies were studied. TVE was applied in 22 patients with large lesions (=10 cm) or lesions with connections to the major hepatic veins or inferior vena cava. PTC (n=15) and LVO (n=23) were applied in remaining cases.</p><p>Results: Clamping method was efficient in 87%, 93% and 100% for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Median blood transfusions were 0,3 and 2 units for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Postoperative aminotransferase peak value was significantly lower after LVO than after PTC or TVE, while those peaks were not statistically different with these latter two methods. Postoperative prothrombin time fall value was identical in the three groups. Mortality was 3.3% (2/60) and was not influenced by the type of clamping, but both deaths and most complications occurred in patients with abnormal underlying liver parenchyma.</p><p>Conclusion: Provided that adequate techniques are used, the need for blood transfusions is more dependent on the characteristics of the resected tumor than on the type of clamping used. Total vascular exclusion does not create more ischemic injury to the liver than portal triad clamping and it should be recommended for the resection of large or strategically located tumors. Other tumors can be resected in more than 80% of the cases with LVO, thus avoiding ischemia to the remnant liver. With the control of hemorrhage, pathology of underlying liver parenchyma has emerged as the main prognostic factor in major liver resections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"124 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00074-4\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400199000744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400199000744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

血管闭塞在肝大切除术中的选择性应用。目的:报道在肝大切除术中根据肝病变的大小和部位选择血管闭塞的效果。背景:全血管排除术(TVE)和门静脉三合一夹持术(PTC)能保证有效的止血效果,但会导致肝脏热缺血。大叶血管闭塞(LVO)避免了残肝的热缺血,但可能导致出血量增加。患者和方法:对60例连续肝大切除术进行了研究。22例病灶较大(≥10 cm)或与肝大静脉或下腔静脉有连接的病灶均应用TVE。其余病例采用PTC (n=15)和LVO (n=23)。结果:夹持法对LVO、PTC和TVE的有效率分别为87%、93%和100%。LVO、PTC和TVE的中位输血量分别为0、3和2单位。LVO术后转氨酶峰值明显低于PTC或TVE,后两种方法的转氨酶峰值差异无统计学意义。三组术后凝血酶原时间下降值相同。死亡率为3.3%(2/60),不受夹夹类型的影响,但死亡和大多数并发症发生在异常的肝实质患者中。结论:如果使用了适当的技术,输血的需要更多地取决于切除肿瘤的特征,而不是所使用的夹紧方式。全血管排除术并不比门静脉三联锁紧术对肝脏造成更大的缺血性损伤,因此应推荐用于切除大的或战略性位置的肿瘤。超过80%的LVO病例可切除其他肿瘤,从而避免残肝缺血。随着出血的控制,肝实质病理已成为肝大切除术的主要预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilisation sélective des clampages vasculaires au cours des hépatectomies majeures

Selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies.

Objective: To report the results of a selective use of vascular occlusions in major hepatectomies according to the size and location of the hepatic lesion.

Background: Total vascular exclusion (TVE) and portal triad clamping (PTC) ensure efficient hemostatic effect but lead to warm ischemia of the liver. Lobar vascular occlusion (LVO) avoids warm ischemia of the remnant liver but could result in increased blood loss.

Patients and methods: Sixty consecutive major hepatectomies were studied. TVE was applied in 22 patients with large lesions (=10 cm) or lesions with connections to the major hepatic veins or inferior vena cava. PTC (n=15) and LVO (n=23) were applied in remaining cases.

Results: Clamping method was efficient in 87%, 93% and 100% for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Median blood transfusions were 0,3 and 2 units for LVO, PTC and TVE, respectively. Postoperative aminotransferase peak value was significantly lower after LVO than after PTC or TVE, while those peaks were not statistically different with these latter two methods. Postoperative prothrombin time fall value was identical in the three groups. Mortality was 3.3% (2/60) and was not influenced by the type of clamping, but both deaths and most complications occurred in patients with abnormal underlying liver parenchyma.

Conclusion: Provided that adequate techniques are used, the need for blood transfusions is more dependent on the characteristics of the resected tumor than on the type of clamping used. Total vascular exclusion does not create more ischemic injury to the liver than portal triad clamping and it should be recommended for the resection of large or strategically located tumors. Other tumors can be resected in more than 80% of the cases with LVO, thus avoiding ischemia to the remnant liver. With the control of hemorrhage, pathology of underlying liver parenchyma has emerged as the main prognostic factor in major liver resections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信