人工髋关节置换术采用全身麻醉还是脊髓麻醉?患者对两种治疗方法的接受度研究]。

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 1999-01-01
H D Stober, T Mencke
{"title":"人工髋关节置换术采用全身麻醉还是脊髓麻醉?患者对两种治疗方法的接受度研究]。","authors":"H D Stober,&nbsp;T Mencke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing total hip replacement are given general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of patients before, during and after general anaesthesia (68 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (77 patients). Our investigation revealed that with regard to complications (nausea and vomiting, headache and back pains), no differences between the two methods occurred. Between 25 and 30% of the patients in both groups had these complications, although there were differences between both groups regarding their concomitant diseases and medication. Patients with spinal anaesthesia had a three times higher incidence of cardiac concomitant diseases and received corresponding drugs more frequently. We found that the time of postoperative analgesia after spinal anaesthesia (210 minutes) was significantly longer than after general anaesthesia (90 minutes). The majority of the patients in both groups (approximately 90%) were satisfied with the chosen method of anaesthesia and with the postoperative pain therapy. These findings make it possible to conclude that with the exception of differences in the postoperative analgesia time, there are no differences between general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia regarding complications and satisfaction of the patients with both methods of anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"24 6","pages":"151-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[General anesthesia or spinal anesthesia for hip prosthesis replacement? Studies of acceptance of both procedures by patients].\",\"authors\":\"H D Stober,&nbsp;T Mencke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients undergoing total hip replacement are given general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of patients before, during and after general anaesthesia (68 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (77 patients). Our investigation revealed that with regard to complications (nausea and vomiting, headache and back pains), no differences between the two methods occurred. Between 25 and 30% of the patients in both groups had these complications, although there were differences between both groups regarding their concomitant diseases and medication. Patients with spinal anaesthesia had a three times higher incidence of cardiac concomitant diseases and received corresponding drugs more frequently. We found that the time of postoperative analgesia after spinal anaesthesia (210 minutes) was significantly longer than after general anaesthesia (90 minutes). The majority of the patients in both groups (approximately 90%) were satisfied with the chosen method of anaesthesia and with the postoperative pain therapy. These findings make it possible to conclude that with the exception of differences in the postoperative analgesia time, there are no differences between general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia regarding complications and satisfaction of the patients with both methods of anaesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"151-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受全髋关节置换术的患者接受全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉。本研究的目的是调查患者在全身麻醉(68例)或脊髓麻醉(77例)之前、期间和之后的经历。我们的调查显示,关于并发症(恶心和呕吐,头痛和背痛),两种方法之间没有差异。两组患者中有25%至30%的患者出现了这些并发症,尽管两组患者在伴随疾病和用药方面存在差异。脊髓麻醉患者心脏伴随疾病的发生率高3倍,使用相应药物的频率也高。我们发现脊髓麻醉后的术后镇痛时间(210分钟)明显长于全身麻醉后(90分钟)。两组大多数患者(约90%)对选择的麻醉方法和术后疼痛治疗感到满意。综上所述,除了术后镇痛时间不同外,全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉在并发症和患者满意度方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[General anesthesia or spinal anesthesia for hip prosthesis replacement? Studies of acceptance of both procedures by patients].

Patients undergoing total hip replacement are given general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of patients before, during and after general anaesthesia (68 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (77 patients). Our investigation revealed that with regard to complications (nausea and vomiting, headache and back pains), no differences between the two methods occurred. Between 25 and 30% of the patients in both groups had these complications, although there were differences between both groups regarding their concomitant diseases and medication. Patients with spinal anaesthesia had a three times higher incidence of cardiac concomitant diseases and received corresponding drugs more frequently. We found that the time of postoperative analgesia after spinal anaesthesia (210 minutes) was significantly longer than after general anaesthesia (90 minutes). The majority of the patients in both groups (approximately 90%) were satisfied with the chosen method of anaesthesia and with the postoperative pain therapy. These findings make it possible to conclude that with the exception of differences in the postoperative analgesia time, there are no differences between general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia regarding complications and satisfaction of the patients with both methods of anaesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信