{"title":"新型DMARD来氟米特治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:与安慰剂和磺胺氮嗪的比较","authors":"J S Smolen","doi":"10.1080/030097499750042245-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":21501,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":"112 ","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/030097499750042245-1","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"J S Smolen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/030097499750042245-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/030097499750042245-1\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/030097499750042245-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/030097499750042245-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
摘要
在一项随机双盲研究中,将新型DMARD来氟米特的疗效和安全性与安慰剂和磺胺嘧啶进行了比较。在第24周,与安慰剂相比,来氟米特显著减少了压痛和肿胀的关节计数以及医生和患者的评估评分(P < 0.001)。来氟米特的缓解率显著高于安慰剂:ACR为20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001)。磺胺吡啶的有效率相当(ACR为20%:56%)。来氟米特与安慰剂或柳氮磺胺吡啶相比显著提高HAQ评分(P < 0.009)。来氟米特起效迅速,早在第2周就观察到。来氟米特组放射学疾病进展明显慢于安慰剂组(P < 0.01)。来氟米特耐受性良好。在选择继续治疗长达2年的患者中,没有报告来氟米特的长期安全性问题。来氟米特治疗RA的疗效维持2年。
Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis.
The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.