机械环境影响同种异体移植物的结合。

J Benevenia, M Zimmerman, J Keating, F Cyran, M Blacksin, J R Parsons
{"title":"机械环境影响同种异体移植物的结合。","authors":"J Benevenia,&nbsp;M Zimmerman,&nbsp;J Keating,&nbsp;F Cyran,&nbsp;M Blacksin,&nbsp;J R Parsons","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a bilateral canine tibial model, the mechanical, radiologic, and histologic characteristics of intercalary allografts stabilized with locked intramedullary nails were compared with those of allografts fixed with compression plates. Both methods of fixation achieved healing to host bone. Tibiae that were plated had more callus with statistically greater mean torsional rigidity and strength than those treated with nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.05). On average, tibiae which had been plated had much higher bending rigidity than those fixed with locked nails; however, the difference in means was not statistically significant. Histomorphometric analysis showed an overall greater total bone formation in those limbs treated with plates compared to nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.04). The mechanical environment created by the different fixation methods are thought to be responsible for the observed differences in healing pattern. The traditional concept of fixation for allografts to achieve maximum rigidity of the construct may not necessarily promote the most appropriate host healing response in all situations. A less rigid fixation method (plates) produced more callus resulting in superior torsional and bending properties. These data show that in this canine intercalary allograft model, limbs fixed with plates produced more external callus resulting in stronger, more rigid healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research","volume":"53 1","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation.\",\"authors\":\"J Benevenia,&nbsp;M Zimmerman,&nbsp;J Keating,&nbsp;F Cyran,&nbsp;M Blacksin,&nbsp;J R Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a bilateral canine tibial model, the mechanical, radiologic, and histologic characteristics of intercalary allografts stabilized with locked intramedullary nails were compared with those of allografts fixed with compression plates. Both methods of fixation achieved healing to host bone. Tibiae that were plated had more callus with statistically greater mean torsional rigidity and strength than those treated with nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.05). On average, tibiae which had been plated had much higher bending rigidity than those fixed with locked nails; however, the difference in means was not statistically significant. Histomorphometric analysis showed an overall greater total bone formation in those limbs treated with plates compared to nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.04). The mechanical environment created by the different fixation methods are thought to be responsible for the observed differences in healing pattern. The traditional concept of fixation for allografts to achieve maximum rigidity of the construct may not necessarily promote the most appropriate host healing response in all situations. A less rigid fixation method (plates) produced more callus resulting in superior torsional and bending properties. These data show that in this canine intercalary allograft model, limbs fixed with plates produced more external callus resulting in stronger, more rigid healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在双侧犬胫骨模型中,我们比较了髓内钉固定的同种异体骨移植与加压钢板固定的同种异体骨移植的力学、放射学和组织学特征。两种固定方法均可实现宿主骨的愈合。钢板胫骨骨痂较多,平均扭转刚度和强度均高于钉钉治疗(配对t检验,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation.

In a bilateral canine tibial model, the mechanical, radiologic, and histologic characteristics of intercalary allografts stabilized with locked intramedullary nails were compared with those of allografts fixed with compression plates. Both methods of fixation achieved healing to host bone. Tibiae that were plated had more callus with statistically greater mean torsional rigidity and strength than those treated with nails (paired t-test, p

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信