急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜或开腹手术(200例)。比较结果和诱发转换的因素

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
J.P. Araujo-Teixeira , J. Rocha-Reis , A. Costa-Cabral , H. Barros , A.C. Saraiva , A.M. Araujo-Teixeira
{"title":"急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜或开腹手术(200例)。比较结果和诱发转换的因素","authors":"J.P. Araujo-Teixeira ,&nbsp;J. Rocha-Reis ,&nbsp;A. Costa-Cabral ,&nbsp;H. Barros ,&nbsp;A.C. Saraiva ,&nbsp;A.M. Araujo-Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/S0001-4001(00)88276-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study aim</h3><p>The aim of this prospective study was to compare the results of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis through laparoscopic and open approach and to assess factors responsible for conversion into laparotomy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>From January 1991 to October 1997, 200 patients with calculous acute cholecystitis were operated on in the same center, 100 through laparoscopy and 100 through laparotomy. Choice between these two procedures was only dependent on the disponibility of videolaparoscopic material. Comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups concerned postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, hospital stay duration and late results. Intraoperative conversion into laparotomy occurred in 24 patients and factors responsible for conversion were assessed with univaried and multivaried analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups were comparable with regard to sex ratio, age, ASA score but associated diseases incidence, plastron, fever above 38 ° C and leucocytosis were significantly more frequent in the laparotomy group and delay between diagnosis and surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. There were two postoperative deaths in the laparotomy group, 0 in the laparoscopic group (NS). Morbidity rate was higher (32% versus 10%) (p=0.0002) and hospital stay longer (12 ± 10 days, versus 5 ± 3) in the laparotomy group (p=0.00005). Late results were similar in both groups. Conversion rate into laparotomy was 24%. Factors predisposing significantly to conversion were in univaried analysis : plastron, fever above 38 ° C, leucocytosis, delay between diagnosis and surgery above 4 days, presence on ultrasonography of pericholecystic liquid and gallbladder wall edema, presence of ≪Klebsiella≫ in gallbladder bile. With multivaried analysis, leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery were the only independent factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient technique in the treatment of acute cholecystitis, with a lower postoperative morbidity rate and a shorter hospital stay. Conversion rate into laparotomy is significantly dependant on leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed as soon as possible in acute cholecystitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29786,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie","volume":"124 5","pages":"Pages 529-535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(00)88276-8","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopie ou laparotomie dans la cholécystite aiguë (200 cas). Comparaison des résultats et facteurs prédisposant à la conversion\",\"authors\":\"J.P. Araujo-Teixeira ,&nbsp;J. Rocha-Reis ,&nbsp;A. Costa-Cabral ,&nbsp;H. Barros ,&nbsp;A.C. Saraiva ,&nbsp;A.M. Araujo-Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0001-4001(00)88276-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study aim</h3><p>The aim of this prospective study was to compare the results of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis through laparoscopic and open approach and to assess factors responsible for conversion into laparotomy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>From January 1991 to October 1997, 200 patients with calculous acute cholecystitis were operated on in the same center, 100 through laparoscopy and 100 through laparotomy. Choice between these two procedures was only dependent on the disponibility of videolaparoscopic material. Comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups concerned postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, hospital stay duration and late results. Intraoperative conversion into laparotomy occurred in 24 patients and factors responsible for conversion were assessed with univaried and multivaried analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups were comparable with regard to sex ratio, age, ASA score but associated diseases incidence, plastron, fever above 38 ° C and leucocytosis were significantly more frequent in the laparotomy group and delay between diagnosis and surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. There were two postoperative deaths in the laparotomy group, 0 in the laparoscopic group (NS). Morbidity rate was higher (32% versus 10%) (p=0.0002) and hospital stay longer (12 ± 10 days, versus 5 ± 3) in the laparotomy group (p=0.00005). Late results were similar in both groups. Conversion rate into laparotomy was 24%. Factors predisposing significantly to conversion were in univaried analysis : plastron, fever above 38 ° C, leucocytosis, delay between diagnosis and surgery above 4 days, presence on ultrasonography of pericholecystic liquid and gallbladder wall edema, presence of ≪Klebsiella≫ in gallbladder bile. With multivaried analysis, leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery were the only independent factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient technique in the treatment of acute cholecystitis, with a lower postoperative morbidity rate and a shorter hospital stay. Conversion rate into laparotomy is significantly dependant on leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed as soon as possible in acute cholecystitis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"124 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 529-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(00)88276-8\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400100882768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400100882768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

研究目的本前瞻性研究的目的是比较急性胆囊炎经腹腔镜和开腹入路胆囊切除术的结果,并评估导致转入开腹手术的因素。患者与方法1991年1月~ 1997年10月在同一中心对200例结石性急性胆囊炎进行手术治疗,其中腹腔镜手术100例,开腹手术100例。这两种方法之间的选择仅取决于视频腹腔镜材料的不稳定性。腹腔镜组与开腹组术后死亡率、发病率、住院时间及术后结果的比较。24例患者发生术中转化为开腹手术,并通过单因素和多因素分析评估转化的原因。结果两组在性别比例、年龄、ASA评分方面具有可比性,但剖腹手术组相关疾病发生率、血小板、发热38℃以上、白细胞增多明显高于剖腹手术组,诊断和手术之间的延迟时间明显长于腹腔镜手术组。开腹组术后死亡2例,腹腔镜组术后死亡0例(NS)。剖腹手术组的发病率较高(32%比10%)(p=0.0002),住院时间较长(12±10天比5±3天)(p=0.00005)。两组的后期结果相似。转播率为24%。在单变量分析中,显著诱发转化的因素有:血小板增多、38°C以上的发热、白细胞增多、诊断和手术之间延迟4天以上、超声检查显示胆囊周积液和胆囊壁水肿、胆囊胆汁中存在《克雷伯氏菌》。通过多变量分析,白细胞增多和诊断与手术之间的延迟是唯一的独立因素。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗急性胆囊炎的一种安全、有效的技术,术后发病率低,住院时间短。转成剖腹手术的比率明显依赖于白细胞数量和诊断与手术之间的延迟。急性胆囊炎应尽快行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopie ou laparotomie dans la cholécystite aiguë (200 cas). Comparaison des résultats et facteurs prédisposant à la conversion

Study aim

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the results of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis through laparoscopic and open approach and to assess factors responsible for conversion into laparotomy.

Patients and methods

From January 1991 to October 1997, 200 patients with calculous acute cholecystitis were operated on in the same center, 100 through laparoscopy and 100 through laparotomy. Choice between these two procedures was only dependent on the disponibility of videolaparoscopic material. Comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups concerned postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, hospital stay duration and late results. Intraoperative conversion into laparotomy occurred in 24 patients and factors responsible for conversion were assessed with univaried and multivaried analysis.

Results

Both groups were comparable with regard to sex ratio, age, ASA score but associated diseases incidence, plastron, fever above 38 ° C and leucocytosis were significantly more frequent in the laparotomy group and delay between diagnosis and surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. There were two postoperative deaths in the laparotomy group, 0 in the laparoscopic group (NS). Morbidity rate was higher (32% versus 10%) (p=0.0002) and hospital stay longer (12 ± 10 days, versus 5 ± 3) in the laparotomy group (p=0.00005). Late results were similar in both groups. Conversion rate into laparotomy was 24%. Factors predisposing significantly to conversion were in univaried analysis : plastron, fever above 38 ° C, leucocytosis, delay between diagnosis and surgery above 4 days, presence on ultrasonography of pericholecystic liquid and gallbladder wall edema, presence of ≪Klebsiella≫ in gallbladder bile. With multivaried analysis, leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery were the only independent factors.

Conclusion

Videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient technique in the treatment of acute cholecystitis, with a lower postoperative morbidity rate and a shorter hospital stay. Conversion rate into laparotomy is significantly dependant on leucocytosis and delay between diagnosis and surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed as soon as possible in acute cholecystitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信